Skip to main content

Discipline and the Selected Manifestations of Employee Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Different Approach to Work Discipline

Abstract

This chapter is entitled “Discipline and the Selected Manifestations of Employee Behaviour”. It discusses psycho-social and organisational causes of counterproductive behaviour, as well as the selected manifestations of unethical and criminal behaviour such as sabotage, theft, financial fraud and corruption. The author also describes types of behaviour harmful to employees, for example, mobbing, stalking, harassment and blackmail. Every sub-chapter contains information concerning manifestations of various types of unethical and criminal behaviour, as well as methods of preventing such behaviour. The author indicates the limitations of various forms of preventing unethical behaviour and problems with their identification. The chapter ends with conclusions concerning possible further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During quality audits conducted in the years 2009–2013, the author used to check the status of the process approach in the Polish local government administration. Among 20 audited offices, only one had integrated the processes functioning within the scope of managerial control with the processes of the quality management system.

  2. 2.

    For example, after the fall of Enron more attention was paid to corporate governance, which cannot be based on formal and normative solutions only as it depends on the adoption of voluntary standards.

  3. 3.

    Some research proves that positions held by employees within a power structure influence their behaviour (e.g. Deluna 2016: 17–17).

  4. 4.

    Almost 30% of the 700 largest British companies did not pay taxes in the years 2006–2007.

    In 2012 it turned out that Starbucks had not paid taxes in the United Kingdom for three years. Tesco, an icon of British commerce, developed a special offshore structure of tax havens in order to avoid paying taxes.

  5. 5.

    According to K. Durniat (2014), Poland is the fourth European country (after Sweden, France and Belgium) to implement legal regulations concerning the protection of employees against mobbing.

References

  • Act of 26 June 1974 r. The Labour Law, art. 94, Dz.U.2014.0.1502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Act of 6 czerwca 1997 roku. Journal of Laws (Dz. U. z 1997 r. Nr 88 poz. 553, z późn. zm.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahamed, Shaik Raffi, and V. Sunderasan. 2016. A Study on Employee Motivation and Its Influence on The Performance of The Organisation. ITIHAS—The Journal of Indian Management 6 (3): 381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, W. Steve, Chad O. Albrecht, Conan C. Albrecht, and Mark F. Zimbelman. 2012. Fraud Examination. 4th ed. Mason, OH: Southm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, Maureen L., Mark A. Seabright, and Marshall Schminke. 2002. Sabotage in the Workplace: The Role of Organizational Justice. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process 89 (1): 947–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An Anticorruption Manual for Public Officers. 2011. Wydawnictwo Centrum Szkolenia Policji w Legionowie, Warszawa, dokument dostępny na stronie. http://www.cba.gov.pl.

  • Analoui, Farhad. 1995. Workplace Sabotage: Its Styles, Motive and Management. Journal of Management Development 7 (14): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, Jeanet Bentzen, Carl-Johan Dalgaard, and Pablo Selaya. 2011. Does the Internet Reduce Corruption? Evidence from U.S. States and across Countries. World Bank Economic Review 25 (3): 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, Lawrence R. 2016. Where Is Fraud Likely in Your Employee Benefit Plan? Benefits Magazine 53 (6): 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardin, H. John, and Donna K. Cooke. 1993. Validity of an Honesty Test in Predicting Theft Among Convenience Store Employees. The Academy of Management Journal 36 (5): 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Walter, N. Stephan Kinsella, and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. 2000. The Second Paradox of Blackmail. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3): 593–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, John G., and Josiah Lowrey. 2012. The Good and Bad About Greed: How the Manifestations of Greed Can Be Used to Improve Organizational and Individual Behavior and Performance. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 64 (2): 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruursema, Kari, Stacey R. Kessler, and Paul E. Spector. 2011. Bored Employees Misbehaving: The Relationship Between Boredom and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Work & Stress 25 (2): 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugdol, Marek. 2007. Gry i zachowania nieetyczne w organizacji. Warszawa: Wyd. Difin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, Arun, and Mark Kenkre. 2011. Fraud Investigations—Employee Fraud. Credit Control 32: 8–3/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Taya R., A.T. Panter, and Nazli Turan. 2013. Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1): 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Death Threat? Yeah, That’s Reason to Quit. 2016. HR Specialist: California Employment Law. 10 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluna, Joann. 2016. Senior-Level Employees are Most Frequent Expense Fraud Offenders. Business Travel News, 6/13/ 33 (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman, Satinder. 2008. Enhancing Business Education: Bringing Ethics and Excellence to Classroom. Journal of Global Business Issues 2 (Spring): 7–11. Conference Edition. 1 Diagram.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibattista, Ron A. 1991. Creating New Approaches to Resource and Deter Sabotage. Public Personnel Management 3 (20): 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Forecasting Sabotage Events in the Workplace. Public Personnel Management 1 (25): 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diette, Timothy M., Arthur H. Goldsmith, Darrick Hamilton, William Darity, and Katherine McFarland. 2014. Stalking: Does it Leave a Psychological Footprint? Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) 95 (2): 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Pierre. 1979. Sabotage in Industry. Home Worth. Pelikan Books (tłumaczenie z j. francuskiego R. Shead).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durniat, Katarzyna. 2014. The Education of Human Capital in the Field of Mobbing Protection. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics (350).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durniat, Katarzyna, Agnieszka Krupa, and Beata Działa. 2016. Organizacyjne mechanizmy prewencji i radzenia sobie z mobbingiem z perspektwy specjalistów HR. Research Papers of the Wrocław University of Economics (430).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, Janelle R., and Maria Rotundo. 2012. When Competition Turns Ugly: Collective Injustice, Workgroup Identification, and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Human Performance 25 (1): 26–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Tine L. Mundberg, Annie Hogh, and Åse Marie Hansen. 2016. Long-Term Consequences of Workplace Bullying on Sickness Absence. Labour Economics 43: 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertureten, Aysegul, Zeynep Cemalcilar, and Zeynep Aycan. 2013. The Relationship of Downward Mobbing with Leadership Style and Organizational Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, Nolan. 2014. Google Employee Arrested for Alleged Nude Photo Blackmail. Time.com. 10/28/, pN. PAG. 1p.

  • Fitzgerald, Louise F., Sandra L. Shullman, Nancy Bailey, Margaret Richards, Janice Swecker, Yael Gold, Mimi Ormerod, and Lauren Weitzman. 1988. The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 32 (2): 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, Shane, and Simon A. Moss. 2007. The Impact of Personality and Team Context on the Relationship Between Workplace Injustice and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37 (11): 2549–2575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flurry, Laura A., and Krist Swimberghe. 2016. Consumer Ethics of Adolescents. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 24 (1, Winter): 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forward, Susan, and Donna Fraizer. 1999. Szantaż emocjonalny. Jak bronić się przed manipulacją i wykorzystaniem. Gdańsk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, Clinton, and Pamela R. Murphy. 2015. The Ties That Bind: The Decision to Co-Offend in Fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (1): 18–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, Thomas. 1994. Everybody Does It! Crimes by the Public. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbutt, Cynthia Horvath, and Lamont E. Stalworth. 1989. Theft in Workplace: An Arbiter’s Perspective on Employee Discipline. Arbitration Journal 44 (3): 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, Robert A., and Stephen B. Knouse. 1990. Justifying Wrongful Employee Behavior: The Role of Personality in Organizational Sabotage. Journal of Business Ethnic 9 (1): 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glińska-Neweś, Aldona, and Andrzej Lis. 2016. The Paradox of Co-Existence of Organisational Citizenship Behaviours and Counterproductive Work Behaviours. Wrocław: Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics (422).

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, Laura, and Rae Cooper. 2016. ‘But It’s Your Job To Be Friendly’: Employees Coping With and Contesting Sexual Harassment from Customers in the Service Sector. Gender, Work & Organization 23 (5): 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Schaefer, Arthur, Jeff Trigilo, Jamie Negus, and Ceng-Si Ro. 2000. Ethics Education in the Workplace: An Effective Tool to Combat Employee Theft. Journal of Business Ethics 26 (2): 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, John. 2016. The “Anti-Fraud Moment”. Internal Auditor 73 (1): 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idiakheua, E.O., and G.I. Idiakheua. 2012. Counterproductive Work Behaviour of Nigerians: An Insight Into Make-Up Theory. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 4 (7): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Jaclyn M., and Jana L. Raver. 2012. When Self-Management and Surveillance Collide: Consequences for Employees’ Organizational Citizenship and Counterproductive Work Behaviors. Group & Organization Management 37 (3): 308–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Kaifeng, Ying Hong, Patrick F. McKay, Derek R. Avery, David C. Wilson, and Sabrina D. Volpone. 2015. Retaining Employees Through Anti-Sexual Harassment Practices: Exploring the Mediating Role of Psychological Distress and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management 54 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, David, and Timothy C. Salmon. 2016. Sabotage versus Discouragement: Which Dominates Post Promotion Tournament Behavior? Southern Economic Journal 82 (3): 673–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, David. 2004. A Counterproductive Work Behavior Toward Supervisors & Organizations: Injustice, Revenge, & Context. Academy of Management Proceedings, A1–A6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Laws. 1997. no. 88, item 553, as amended.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. Kevin, Lori Francis, Matthew Prosser, and James E. Cameron. 2010. Counterproductive Work Behavior As Protest. Human Resource Management Review 20 (1): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Jay P. 2016. Shedding Light on Employee Theft’s Dark Figure: A Typology of Employee Theft Nonreporting Rationalizations. Organization Management Journal (Routledge) 13 (1): 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, Anthony C., and Mark C. Bolino. 2013. Citizenship and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moral Licensing View. Academy of Management Review 38 (2): 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutera, Małgorzata. 2016. Nadużycia finansowe. Wykrywanie i zapobieganie. Warszawa: Difin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langseth, Petter. 1999. (opracowanie), Prevention: An Effective Tool to Reduce Corruption. Centre for International Crime Prevention, Office of Drug Control and Crime Prevention, United Nations Office at Vienna. Referat prezentowany podczas koferencji—The ISPAC conference on Responding to the Challenge of Corruption, 19 November 1999, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaReau, Jamie. 2012. Store’s Fitness Focus is a Win-Win for Losers. Automotive News, 2/10/NADA Show Daily Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Grace. 2014. We Need to Talk About Stalking. People Management: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, Heinz. 1990. Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplaces. Violence and Victims 5 (2): 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Matthew John. 2016. Combating Collusion. Governance Directions 68 (7): 418–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Zhen, and Meixin Xu. 2012. Preliminary Exploring the Influence of Person-Organization Fit on Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Business & Management 4 (2): 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloréns Vélez, Eva. 2012. Companies Still Must Do More to Be Transparent, Anticorruption Group Says. Caribbean Business, 7/26/ 40 (29): 22–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magd, Hesham. 2003. Management Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Employees in Hospitality Management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 15 (7): 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmutefendić, Tahir. 2014. Economics of Theft. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Istocnom Sarajevu (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, Troy E., Paul E. Mullen, and Rachel MacKenzie. 2009. A Study of the Predictors of Persistence in Stalking Situations. Law & Human Behavior 33 (2): 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, Andi. 2016. What’s Your Fraud IQ? This Month: Employee Handbooks and Policies. Journal of Accountancy 222 (3): 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Jesse S., and Nathan A. Bowling. 2013. Does Dispositional Aggression Feed the Narcissistic Response? The Role of Narcissism and Aggression in the Prediction of Job Attitudes and Counterproductive Work Behaviors. Journal of Business & Psychology 28 (1): 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Pamela R., and Clinton Free. 2016. Broadening the Fraud Triangle: Instrumental Climate and Fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting 28 (1, Spring): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ombler, Kathy. 2016. Corporate Fraud: Who is Vulnerable and Why It Could Be Any Organization. NZ Business + Management 30 (4): 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakdel, Abdollah, Qader Vazifeh Damirchi, and Hafez Gholizadeh. 2012. Corruption and Anti-Corruption Policies in Developing Countries. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 3 (9): 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priesemuth, Manuela, Anke Arnaud, and Marshall Schminke. 2013. Bad Behavior in Groups: The Impact of Overall Justice Climate and Functional Dependence on Counterproductive Work Behavior in Work. Units Group & Organization Management 38 (2): 230–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resch, Martin, and Marion Schubinski. 1996. Mobbing—Prevention and Management in Organizations. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 5 (2): 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retaliation? Not If You Can Prove You Would Have Fired Anyone Who Broke the Same Rule. 2016. HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law. 9 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Paul H., Michael T. Cahill, and Daniel M. Bartels. 2010. Competing Theories of Blackmail: An Empirical Research Critique of Criminal Law Theory. Texas Law Review 89 (2): 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, Alexandru. 2012. The Myths Within Anticorruption Policies. Administrative Theory & Praxis (M.E. Sharpe) 34 (2): 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, Barry, and Charles Lewis. 2005. Assessing Violent Risk in Stalking Cases: A Regression Tree Approach. Law and Human Behavior 29 (3): 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, Farida, and C. Gopinath. 2015. Injustice, Counterproductive Work Behavior and Mediating Role of Work Stress. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences 9 (3): 683–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, David E., and Dennis L. Weisman. 2004. Competition Policy, Parity Regulation and Self-Sabotage. Info 1 (6): 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Hideki. 2011. Raising Wages as a Strategy to Reduce Corruption. Journal of Management & Strategy, Dec 2 (4): –56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Brent A., and Timothy A. Judge. 2013. Beauty, Personality, and Affect as Antecedents of Counterproductive Work Behavior Receipt. Human Performance 26 (2): 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoss, Mindy, D.K. Jundt, Allison Kobler, and Clair A. Reynolds. 2016. Doing Bad to Feel Better? An Investigation of Within- and Between-Person Perceptions of Counterproductive Work Behavior As a Coping Tactic. Journal of Business Ethics 137 (3): 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle, Stuard D. 2010. Counterproductive Work Behavior: Can It Sometimes Be Good to Be. Academy of Management Perspectives 24 (3): 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorupka, Stanisław, Halina Auderska, and Zofia Łempicka. 1969. Mały słownik języka polskiego. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolewska, M. Szantaż emocjonalny. http://www.biznestrendy.infor.pl/indexg.1 z dnia. Accessed 28 July 2006.

  • Steinberg, Richard M. 2016. A Culture of Sexual Harassment. Compliance Week 13 (153): 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Survey Highlights Dangers of Data Theft by Ex-Employees. 2011. Manager: British Journal of Administrative Management 74 (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taher, Nader Asaad Bin, and Vlad Krotov. 2016. Business Process Reengineering: Addressing Sources of Resistance and Sabotage Tactics. Journal of Competitiveness Studies 24 (3): 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Social Cost of Review of Law & Economics. 2011. 7 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, Patricia, and Nancy Thoennes. 1998. Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Study. Pp. 1–19 in Research Brief. National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toker, Yonca. 2016. Perception Differences in Ambiguous Forms of Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Comparison between the United States and Turkey. Journal of Psychology 150 (5): 625–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomić, Mileta. 2012. Mobbing: The Incidence of Mobbing Activities and Differences Regarding Workplace and Gender. Megatrend Review 9 (1): 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylczak, Lynn, and Thomas E. Sheets. 1995. Preventing Workplace Theft. They are Stealing from You. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, Wim, and M.S. Ronald Commers. 2003. Downward Workplace Mobbing: A Sign of the Times? Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1–2): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Feng, and Steven Si. 2013. Tit for Tat? Abusive Supervision and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Moderating Effects of Locus of Control and Perceived Mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30 (1): 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, Lucy. 2016. Stories No One Dares Tell. Newsweek Global, 9/16/, 167 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, David. 2008. Understanding Overwork. Employee Benefits, Special section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worker Absenteeism on Rome’s New Mayor’s “To Do” List. 2016. Acuity 3 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Jane, and James M. Lebreton. 2011. Reconsidering the Dispositional Basis of Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Role of Aberrant Personality. Personnel Psychology 64 (3): 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynen, Jan. 2016. Sexual Harassment: The Nexus Between Gender and Workplace Authority: Evidence from the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadjali, Mahir Al, and Christopher S. Wright. 2012. A New Paradigm of Corruption to Aid in Its Control and Dispel Its Sweet-Spot Myth. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics 9 (1): 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, Dieter. 1999. Organizational, Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing/Bullying at Work. International Journal of Manpower 20 (1/2): 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Федорова, А. С. 2015. Efficient stuff cooperation as an essential component of formation of corporate culture of the enterprise[ Эффективное взаимодействие в коллективе как важная составляющая формирования корпоративной культуры предприятия]. Economy of AIC (11).

    Google Scholar 

  • [www1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Engineering oraz https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/250920. Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

  • [www2]. https://mfiles.pl/pl/index.php/Oszustwo_finansowe. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.

  • [www3]. http: //www.youthkiawaaz.com/2010/08/5-ways-to-reduce-corruption. Accessed 27 Sep 2012.

  • [www4]. http://www.infor.pl/prawo/prawo-karne/pokrzywdzony/704421,Stalking-uporczywe-nekanie.html. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bugdol, M. (2018). Discipline and the Selected Manifestations of Employee Behaviour. In: A Different Approach to Work Discipline. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74008-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics