Advertisement

Systems Thinking and Complexity Science and the Relevance of Big Data Analytics, Intelligence Functions, and Simulation Models

  • Simon Elias BibriEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Smart sustainable cities are complex systems par excellence. This is manifested in a variety of ways to think of and define the underlying many subsystems as connected and joined together by a web of relationships that interact to produce collective behavior that cannot easily be explained in terms of interactions between the individual constituent elements. As such, they involve special conundrums, intractable problems, and complex challenges pertaining to sustainability and urbanization. It follows that to deal with such systems requires newfangled ways founded on more innovative solutions and sophisticated methods with respect to how cities can be monitored, understood, managed, planned, and developed. This necessitates leveraging the advance and prevalence of ICT in the transition toward the needed sustainable urban development in an increasingly urbanized and computerized world. Importantly, smart sustainable cities require advanced thinking approaches to be well understood and illuminated so as to enable more effective actions necessary for enhancing their functioning and adaptation in ways that guide their development toward sustainability. The aim of this chapter is twofold. Grounded in systems thinking and complexity science as theoretic approaches, this chapter endeavors to systematically explore the key underlying structures, behavioral patterns, conditions, relationships, and interactions pertaining to smart sustainable cities as complex systems, and to elucidate the related principles in terms of methods, mechanisms, and goals. The intent of offering the knowledge to describe and analyze such systems accordingly is to surface noteworthy relationships as well as their implications for sustainability so as to provoke thought, foster deeper understanding, and create fertile insights, with the primary purpose of making visible possible places for actions that improve the contribution of smart sustainable cities to the goals of sustainable development. This can be accomplished by means of devising powerful urban intelligence functions and robust urban simulation models for strategic decision-making based on big data analytics in conjunction with urban design concepts and planning principles of sustainability. Accordingly, this chapter also discusses the potential of big data analytics and related urban intelligence functions and urban simulation models for, and the role of urban design in, catalyzing and advancing the strategic process of sustainable development by proposing innovative approaches and solutions for monitoring, managing, planning, and designing smart sustainable cities of the future. The main argument is that the systems thinking and complexity science are integral to the understanding of smart sustainable cities, which is a moving target in that they are becoming more complex through the very technologies being used to understand them. Moreover, advanced ICT is founded on the application of complexity theory to urban problems in terms of tracking the changing dynamics, disentangling the intractable problems, and tackling the challenges pertaining to urban systems, which are in and of themselves becoming ever more complex. As high-performance computers have become an indispensable source of information, complex systems cannot be understood and studied without the use of computers and big data analytics.

Keywords

Smart sustainable cities Systems thinking Systems theory Complexity science Big data analytics Urban intelligence functions Urban simulation models Intractable problems Complex systems Urban sustainability 

References

  1. Abraham MA, Nguyen N (2003) Green engineering: defining the principles. Environ Prog 22(4):233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16(1989):3–9Google Scholar
  3. Al Nuaimi E, Al Neyadi H, Nader M, Al-Jaroodi J (2015) Applications of big data to smart cities. J Internet Serv Appl 6(25):1–15Google Scholar
  4. Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson PW (1972) More is different. Science 177:393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astrom KJ, Murray RM (2008) Feedback systems: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Available online at www.cds.caltech.edu/*murray/amwiki/index.php/Main_Page
  7. Barnes S (2002) Knowledge management systems: theory and practice. Thomson Learning, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bar-Yam Y (2002) General features of complex systems. In: Encyclopedia of life support systems. EOLSS UNESCO Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. E. P. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateson G, Beatrice C (1928) William Bateson, F.R.S.: naturalist, his essays and addresses together with a short account of his life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J 214:481–518Google Scholar
  12. Batty M (2013) Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues Hum Geogr 3(3):274–279Google Scholar
  13. Bellinger G (2005) Systems: a journey along the way. Available from: http://www.systems-thinking.org/systems/systems.htm
  14. Bellinger G, Castro D, Mills A (2006) Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom (2004). Available at: www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
  15. Benham-Hutchins M, Clancy T (2010) Social networks as embedded complex adaptive systems. JONA 40(9):352–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bertalanffy Lv (1950a) An outline of general system theory. British J Phil Sci 1:134–165Google Scholar
  17. Bertalanffy Lv (1962) General system theory. A critical review, general systems. In: General system theory, vol 7, pp 1–20. Available from: http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/General_systems_theory
  18. Bertalanffy Lv (1968a) General systems theory. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Bertalanffy Lv (1968b) Organismic psychology and systems theory. Clark University Press, Barre, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  20. Bertalanffy Lv (1968c) General systems theory a critical review. In: Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist, pp 11–30Google Scholar
  21. Bertalanffy Lv (1969) General system theory. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Bettencourt LMA (2014) The uses of big data in cities. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  23. Bibri SE (2015) The shaping of ambient intelligence and the internet of things: historico–epistemic, socio-cultural, politico-institutional and eco-environmental dimensions. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2016) On the social shaping dimensions of smart sustainable cities: a study in science, technology, and society. Sustain Cities Soc 29:219–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2017a) Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain Cities Soc 31:183–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2017b) ICT of the new wave of computing for sustainable urban forms: their big data and context-aware augmented typologies and design concepts. Sustain Cities Soc 32:449–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Björgvinsson E, Ehn P, Hillgren PA (2010) Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In: Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference, ACM, pp 41–50Google Scholar
  28. Bocij P, Chaffey D, Greasley A, Hickie S (2003) Business information systems: technology, development and management for the e-business, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  29. Boulding K (1956) General systems theory: the skeleton of scienceGoogle Scholar
  30. Boulding E (1995) Kenneth Boulding. Syst Res 12(4):259–260Google Scholar
  31. Brail RK (ed) (2008) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Brown HS (2012) Sustainability science needs to include sustainable consumption. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 54(1):20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464(7291):08932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chaffey D, Wood S (2005) Business information management: improving performance using information systems. FT Prentice Hall, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  35. Choo CW (2006) The knowing organization: how organisations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1737–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cohen R, Havlin S (2010) Complex networks: structure, robustness and function. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Correia LM, Wuenstel K (2011) Smart cities applications and requirements. White paper, Net!Works European Technology Platform Working GroupGoogle Scholar
  40. Davidson M (1983) Uncommon sense: the life and thought of Ludwig von Bertalanffy. J. P. Tarcher Inc., Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  41. Dekker S (2010) We have Newton on a retainer: reductionism when we need systems thinking. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf 36(4):147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dorogovtsev SN, Mendes JFF (2003) Evolution of networksGoogle Scholar
  43. Foster J (2001) Education as sustainability. Environ Educ Res 7(2):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Foucault M (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Gao J, Buldyrev SV, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2011) Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nat Phys 8(1):40–48Google Scholar
  46. Giannotti F, Pedreschi D (1998) Mobility, data mining and privacy, Springer–Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Giannotti F, Nanni M, Pedreschi D, Pinelli F, Renso C, Rinzivillo S, Trasarti R (2011) Unveiling the complexity of human mobility by querying and mining massive trajectory data. VLDB JGoogle Scholar
  48. Gribbin J (2005) Deep simplicity: bringing order to chaos and complexityGoogle Scholar
  49. Groff TR, Jones TP (2003) Introduction to knowledge management: KM in business. Butterworth Heinemann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. Hayek F (1978) The results of human action but not of human design. In: New studies in philosophy, politics, economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 96–105Google Scholar
  51. Hayles NK (1991) Chaos bound: orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  52. Heylighen F (1993) Cybernetic technology, principia cybernetica web. Available from: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CYBTECH.html. Accessed, 14 Oct 08
  53. Hieronymi A (2013) Understanding systems science: a visual and integrative approach. Syst Res.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2215
  54. Hillgren PA, Seravalli A, Emilson A (2011) Prototyping and infrastructuring in design of social innovation. Co-Design 7(3–4):169–183Google Scholar
  55. Holmberg J, Robèrt KH (2000) Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles: a framework for strategic planning. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 7(4):291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Huntley N (2003) Open and closed systems. PhD. Available from: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/OpenClosedSystems.htm
  57. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and NYGoogle Scholar
  58. Jashapara A (2005) Knowledge management: an integrated approach. FT Prentice Hall, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  59. Kärrholm M (2007) The materiality of territorial production. Space Cult 10(4):437–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kärrholm M (2011) The scaling of sustainable urban form: some scale—related problems in the context of a Swedish urban landscape. Eur Plan Stud 19(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J, Jaeger C (2001) Sustainability science. Science (Science) 292(5517):641–642Google Scholar
  62. Kellert SH (1993) In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Kieffer SW, Barton P, Palmer AR, Reitan PH, Zen E (2003) Megascale events: natural disasters and human behavior. The Geological Society of America abstracts with programs, p 432Google Scholar
  64. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kramers A, Höjer M, Lövehagen N, Wangel J (2014) Smart sustainable cities: exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environ Modell Softw 56:52–62Google Scholar
  66. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  67. László E (1972) Introduction to systems philosophy: toward a new paradigm of contemporary thoughtGoogle Scholar
  68. Laudon KC, Laudon JP (2006) Management information systems: managing the digital firm. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee K (2000) Global sustainable development: its intellectual and historical roots: global sustainable development in the 21st century. Edinburgh University Press, pp 31–47Google Scholar
  70. Lipset D (1982) Gregory Bateson: the legacy of a scientist. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  71. Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(1963):130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. M’Pherson P (1974) A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy. Futures 6:219–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Majdandzic A, Podobnik B, Buldyrev SV, Kenett DY, Havlin S, Eugene Stanley H (2013) Spontaneous recovery in dynamical networks. Nat Phys 10(1):34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Majdandzic A, Braunstein LA, Curme C, Vodenska I, Levy-Carciente S, Eugene Stanley H, Havlin S (2016) Multiple tipping points and optimal repairing in interacting networks. Nat Commun 7:10850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McDonough W, Braungart M (2003) Towards a sustaining architecture for the 21st century: the promise of cradle-to-cradle design. Ind Environ 26(2):13–16Google Scholar
  76. Meadows D, Wright D (2012) Thinking in systems: a primer. Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
  77. Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. More C, Mertens S (2011) The nature of computation (Oxford University Press, New York NY)Google Scholar
  79. Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  80. Ny H, Macdonald JP, Broman G et al (2006) Sustainability constraints as system boundaries: an approach to making life-cycle management strategic. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):61–77Google Scholar
  81. O’Connor T, Wong HY (2012) Emergent properties. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2012 edition. Spring, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  82. Pagliara F, de Bok M, Simmonds D, Wilson A (eds) (2013) Employment location in cities and regions: models and applications. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  83. Paley J, Gail E (2011) Complexity theory as an approach to explanation in healthcare: a critical discussion. Int J Nurs Stud 48:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pearlson KE, Saunders CS (2004) Managing and using information systems: a strategic approach. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  85. Pearson CJ, Ison RL (1997) Agronomy of grassland systemsGoogle Scholar
  86. Prigogine I (1997) The end of certainty. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Reitan P (2005) Sustainability science—and what’s needed beyond science. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 1(1):77–80Google Scholar
  88. Richmond B (1991) Systems thinking: four key questions. High Performance Systems Inc, LymeGoogle Scholar
  89. Rittel HWJ (1969) Panel on policy sciences. Am Assoc Adv Sci 4:155Google Scholar
  90. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Robèrt KH et al (1997) A compass for sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 4:79–92Google Scholar
  92. Robèrt K-H, Schmidt-Bleek B, De Larderel JA et al (2002) Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J Clean Prod 10(3):197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philos Sci 10:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rowley J (2007) The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J Inf Sci 33(2):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Senge P (1990) The fifth disciplineGoogle Scholar
  96. Shahrokni H, Årman L, Lazarevic D, Nilsson A, Brandt N (2015) Implementing smart urban metabolism in the Stockholm Royal Seaport: smart city SRS. J Ind Ecol 19(5):917–929Google Scholar
  97. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication, 6th edn. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  98. Shugart HH, O’Neill RV (1979) Systems ecology. Dowden, Hutchingon & RossGoogle Scholar
  99. Stables A, Scott W (1999) Environmental education and the discourses of humanist modernity: redefining critical environmental literacy. Educ Philos Theor 31(2):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Thietart RA, Forgues B (1997) Action, structure and chaos. Organ Stud 18:119–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thomé B (1993) Systems engineering: principles and practice of computer-based systems engineering. Wiley, Chichester. ISBN 0-471-93552-2Google Scholar
  102. Tsoukas H (1998) Chaos, complexity and organization theory. Organization 5:291–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Turban E, Rainer RK, Potter RE (2005) Introduction to information technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  104. Van Dyne GM (1966) Ecosystems, systems ecology, and systems ecologists. ORNL–3975. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  105. Walonick DS (1993) General systems theory. PhD. Available from …. Accessed 12 Oct 08Google Scholar
  106. Wiener R (1948) Cybernetics: control and communication in the animal and the machine, The MIT pressGoogle Scholar
  107. Wiener N (1950) The human use of human beings. Riverside Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  108. Wilder-Mott C, Weakland J (eds) (1981) Rigor and imagination: essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson. Praeger, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  109. Wilkinson DM (2006) Fundamental processes in ecology: an earth systems approach. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  110. Zeleny M (1987) Management support systems: towards integrated knowledge management. Hum Syst Manage 7(1):59–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information Science, Department of Urban Design and PlanningNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations