Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unprecedented Innovations in Sustainable Urban Planning: Novel Analytical Solutions and Data-Driven Decision-Making Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

City planning is drastically changing with regard to the way urban systems can function and be managed and developed in line with the goals of sustainable development. Marking and fueling this change predominately is the increasing use and application of big data and data-driven decision-making in urban analytics and planning to advance the contribution of cities to sustainability. This unprecedented shift has been instigated by the recent advances in data science and its becoming a more accessible tool to advocacy groups, more extensive data and their new sources being able to potentially allow key stakeholders to see and respond to various urban factors (mobility, transport, energy, environment, public health care, education, etc.) in real time, coupled with citizens emitting rich spatiotemporal data to an increasing extent through the use of various technologies. We refer to big data with respect to their humongous size and wide variety but pay particular attention to urban data, i.e., data invariably tagged with spatial and temporal labels; largely streamed from diverse sensory sources and stored in databases; generated routinely, automatically, and sporadically; and merged and coalesced in data warehouses for use at the citywide scale. This epitomizes a sea change in the data that we generate about urban systems as to what happens and where, when, how, and why in the urban environment. This is opening entirely new windows of opportunity for the application of analytical solutions and data-driven decision-making approaches into urban planning in terms of improving the performance of, and contribution to, the goals of sustainable development under what is termed smart sustainable cities. This chapter explores the real potential of big data and data-driven decision-making for revolutionizing or transforming the process of planning for the purpose of achieving the goals of sustainable development in the context of smart sustainable cities, focusing on different dimensions and functions of planning as well as their synergy and integration. We argue that the increasing proliferation and availability of urban data, coupled with the continuous integration of new and more extensive sources of such data as well as the evolving development of big data technologies, are increasingly enabling novel analytical solutions for, or sophisticated engineering approaches into, advancing the process of sustainable urban development, in addition to seamlessly integrating long-term strategic planning with short-term thinking about how cities can function and be managed in the context of sustainability. In addition, we believe that big data innovations entail how new data-driven transformations are facilitated and applied as well as diffused throughout urban systems, rather than simply denoting a significant growth in volume and variety of urban data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahvenniemi H, Huovila A, Pinto–Seppä I, Airaksinen M (2017) What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 60:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Nuaimi E, Al Neyadi H, Nader M, Al-Jaroodi J (2015) Applications of big data to smart cities. J Internet Serv Appl 6(25):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrom KJ, Murray RM (2008) Feedback systems: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Available online at www.cds.caltech.edu/*murray/amwiki/index.php/Main_Page

  • Batty M (2010) Env Plann B: Plann Des 37:577

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2013a) Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues Human Geogr 3(3):274–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2013b) Urban informatics and big data. A report to the ESRC cities expert, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), University College London (UCL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J 214:481–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi U (2013) Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environ Dev Sustain 15:1573–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LMA (2014) The uses of big data in cities. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE (2013) ICT for sustainable urban development in the European Information Society: a discursive investigation of energy efficiency technology. Master thesis, School of Culture and Society, Malmö University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE (2015) The shaping of ambient intelligence and the internet of things: historico-epistemic, socio-cultural, politico-institutional and eco-environmental dimensions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2016a) On the social shaping dimensions of smart sustainable cities: a study in science, technology, and society. Sustain Cities Soc 29:219–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2016b) Big data analytics and context–aware computing for smart sustainable cities of the future. In: NOBIDS symposium, vol 1818, pp 4–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2017a) Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain Cities Soc 31:183–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2017b) ICT of the new wave of computing for sustainable urban forms: their big data and context–aware augmented typologies and design concepts. Sustain Cities Soc 32:449–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhlen M, Frei H (2009) Ambient intelligence in the city: overview and new perspectives. In: Nakashima H, Aghajan H, Augusto JC (eds) Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer, New York, pp 911–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdic L, Salat S, Nowacki C (2012) Assessing cities: a new system of cross–scale spatial indicators. Build Res Inf 40(5):592–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickmay J, Weiss CH (2000) Theory-based evaluation in practice: what do we learn? Eval Rev 24(4):407–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plann Assoc 62(3):296–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (2004) The Labyrinths of information: challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cole R (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Build Res Inf 40(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins JB, Earl LM (1992) The case for participatory evaluation’. Edu Eval Policy Anal 14(4):397–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutzig F, Baiocchi G, Bierkandt R, Pichler PP, Seto KC (2015) A global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6283–6288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manage Rev 24(3):522–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle N, Pentland A (2006) Pers Ubiquitous Comp 10:255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle N, Pentland A (2009) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluckiger Y, Seth N (2016) Sustainable development goals: SDG indicators need crowdsourcing. Nature 531:448

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2001) Education as sustainability. Environ Educ Res 7(2):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (1997) Indicators and their use: information for decision-making. In: Moldan B, Billharz S (eds) Sustainability indicators. Report of the project of indicators of sustainable development. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapio A (2012) Towards sustainable urban communities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 32:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE (2002) How the built environment affects physical activity views from urban planning. Am J Prev Med 23(2S):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman Ã…, Sepponen M, Virtanen M (2014) Energy efficiency rating of districts, case Finland. Energy Policy 65:408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert M, Lopez P (2011) The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science 332:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SL, Yeh CT, Budd WW, Chen LL (2009) A Sensitivity Model (SM) approach to analyze urban development in Taiwan based on sustainability indicators. Environ Imp Assess Rev 29:116–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.03.003

  • International Council for Science (ICSU) (2015) Review of targets for the sustainable development goals: the science perspective. Available online: http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/review–of–targets–for–the–sustainable–development–goals–the–science–perspective–2015/SDG–Report.pdf. Accessed on 1 Dec 2016

  • Glaser G (2012) Policy: base sustainable development goals on science. Nature 491:35

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Pournaras E (2015) Society: build digital democracy. Nature 527:33–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M, Wangel S (2015) Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In: Hilty LM, Aebischer B (eds) ICT innovations for sustainability. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 310. Springer International Publishing, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen YR (2006) Sustainable urban forms: their typologies, models, and concepts. J Plann Edu Res 26:38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson AW, Lindhult E (2008) Emancipation or workability?: critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Res 6(1):95–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph B, Sullivan TA (1975) Sociology of science. Ann Rev Sociol 1(1):203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir B, van Asselt BAM, Durrenberger G, Jaeger CC (1999) Integrated assessment of sustainable development: multiple perspectives in interaction. Int J Environ Pollut 11:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kärrholm M (2011) The scaling of sustainable urban form: some scale—related problems in the context of a Swedish urban landscape. Eur Plan Stud 19(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, Anjum A, Soomro K, Tahir MA (2015) Towards cloud based big data analytics for smart future cities. J Cloud Comput Adv Syst Appl 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharrazi A, Qin H, Zhang Y (2016) Urban big data and sustainable development goals: challenges and opportunities. Sustainability 8(1293):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2014) The real–time city? Big data and smart urbanism. Geo J 79:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Prakash A (2014) The role of big data and analytics in smart cities. Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 6(14):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus P (2012) Measuring urban sustainability: the potential and pitfalls of city rankings. Aust Geogr 43(4):411–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsal-Llacuna M-L, Colomer-Llinàs J, Meléndez-Frigola J (2015) Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the smart cities initiative. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 90(B):611–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schonberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer (2014) 2014 quality of living worldwide rankings—mercer survey. New York. http://www.uk.mercer.com/newsroom/2014-quality-of-living-survey.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2017

  • Moldan B, Billharz S (eds) (1997) ‘Sustainability indicators’, Report of the project of indicators of sustainable development. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • More C, Mertens S (2011) The nature of computation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nam T, Pardo TA (2011) Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on digital government research

    Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti P, De Marco A, Cagliano AC, Mangano G, Scorrano F (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives—some stylised facts. Cities 38:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman M (2005) The compact city fallacy. J Plann Edu Res 25:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen M (2011) Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nilon C, Berkowitz A, Hollweg K (2003) Introduction: ecosystem understanding is a key to understanding cities. In: Berkowitz A (eds) Understanding urban ecosystems. A new frontier for science and education. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012) OECD environmental outlook to 2050. The consequences of inaction. OECD Publishing. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/miljoarbete–i–samhallet/internationellt–miljoarbete/multilateralt/oecd/outolook–2050–oecd.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2017

  • Ortega-Cerdà M (2004) Sustainability indicators as discursive elements. Viewed 20 Oct 2012. http://www.ent–consulting.com/images/stories/ENT/pdf/articles/indicators.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1996) A world larger than formative and summative. Eval Pract 17(2):131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali Y (2011) Complexity, cognition and the city. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reed B (2007) Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Build Res Inf 35(6):674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J, Cole R (2015) Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Build Res Inf 43(2):133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salat S, Bourdic L (2012) Systemic resilience of complex urban systems. TeMATrimestrale del Laboratorio Territorio Mobilità e Ambiente–TeMALab 5(2):55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg J (2000) Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach. Acad Manag J 43(1):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang G, Smith A (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Politics 16:584–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnfelder S, Axhausen KW (2010) Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel. Ashgate Publishing Company, Farnborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A, Murayama A (2013) A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev 38:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stame N (2004) Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation 10(1):58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahrokni H, Ã…rman L, Lazarevic D, Nilsson A, Brandt N (2015) Implementing smart urban metabolism in the Stockholm Royal Seaport: smart city SRS. J Ind Ecol 19(5):917–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre J-F, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Ind 10:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcu C (2013) Re–thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. J Environ Planning Manage 56(5):695–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend A (2013) Smart cities—big data, civic hackers and the quest for a new utopia. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) World urbanization prospects. The 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. http://www.esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014–Report.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2017

  • Weiss CH (1998) Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? Am J Eval 19(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler SM (2002) Constructing sustainable development/safeguarding our common future: rethinking sustainable development. J Am Plann Assoc 68(1):110–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (eds) (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Science, Department of Urban Design and Planning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Simon Elias Bibri

Authors
  1. Simon Elias Bibri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Elias Bibri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bibri, S.E. (2018). Unprecedented Innovations in Sustainable Urban Planning: Novel Analytical Solutions and Data-Driven Decision-Making Processes. In: Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73981-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation