Summary and Outlook

  • Gábor Hofer-SzabóEmail author
  • Péter Vecsernyés
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


In this Chapter we summarize the main results of this book and investigate their philosophical consequences. We argue that embracing noncommuting “beables” in our ontology significantly extends our explanatory sources in accounting for correlations. We also examine what price we need to pay for abandoning classicality in order to preserve local causality.


Noncommuting beables Noncommutative ontology 


  1. E.G. Cavalcanti, R. Lal, On modifications of Reichenbach’s principle of common cause in light of Bell’s theorems. J. Phys. A 47, 42 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. G. Hofer-Szabó, G., M. Rédei, Reichenbachian common cause systems. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 1819–1826 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. G. Hofer-Szabó, G. M. Rédei, Reichenbachian common cause systems of arbitrary finite size exist. Found. Phys. 35, 745–746 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. H. Reichenbach, The Direction of Time (University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1956)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyResearch Centre for the HumanitiesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Theoretical PhysicsWigner Research Centre for PhysicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations