Abstract
Federally-funded longitudinal datasets have become a primary source of information for anyone attempting to describe, evaluate, or influence the American education system. Every year these datasets provide the raw material for thousands of research articles and assessments of the American school system including claims about educational access, attainment, and achievement gaps. Despite their considerable influence in research and policy conversations, longitudinal datasets have received little scholarly attention from historians of education, leaving the ideas embedded in them and the kinds of thinking and ways of seeing the American school system that they enabled largely unexamined. This paper takes up this issue and examines the way in which early efforts to produce longitudinal information about the operation of America’s schools – through Project Talent and the National Longitudinal Study of 1972 – shaped the research and the claims that could be made about the American education system. I argue that these efforts were intimately tied to the ambition to bring systems analysis to bear on questions of school reform – an ambition that created a demand for larger, more precise statistics on school operations – and helped co-construct new ideas about American educational equity and opportunity. While Project Talent reflected the Progressive Era view of educational equity as providing appropriately differentiated schooling, NLS72 represented a new concern for educational inequity as the difference in the aggregated chances of individual students. Though these early efforts failed to deliver on the promise to identify the precise relationship between identifiable school characteristics and school outcomes, they demonstrated the general viability of these techniques and pointed the way toward this new frontier of research. In attending to this history, I seek to bring attention to what has become a foundational part of the American educational research infrastructure and the influence that infrastructure has had on education research. In providing new capabilities for researchers and advocates, NLS-72 influenced the kinds of claims – for both good and ill – that would define policy conversations for decades to come: bringing into focus a broader picture of national disparities while at the same time obscuring local context and geographic distance. Just as consequentially, the initial survey continues to cast a shadow on American education research through the repetition of initial variables and survey constructs in subsequent decennial surveys (e.g. ELS, HS&B, NELS, etc.) – shaping the way we think about educational success, failure, and inequity in America.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adelman, C. (1983). Devaluation, diffusion and the college connection: A study of high school transcripts, 1964–1981. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
Aikin, W. M. (1942). The story of the eight-year study. New York: Harper Brothers.
Akera, A. (2000). Engineers or managers? The systems analysis of electronic data processing in the federal bureaucracy. In T. P. Hughes & A. C. Hughes (Eds.), Systems experts and computers (pp. 191–215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alexander, K. L., Cook, M., & McDill, E. L. (1978). Curriculum tracking and educational stratification: Some further evidence. American Sociological Review, 43(1), 47–66.
Alexander, K. L., Riordan, C., Fennessey, J., & Pallas, A. M. (1982). Social background, academic resources, and college graduation: Recent evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey. American Journal of Education, 90(4), 315–333.
Beatty, M. L. (1960, April 3). Fish bowl test may reveal next Einstein. Chicago Daily Tribune.
Borgman, J. (1997, April 27). Today’s random medical news. New York Times, p. E4.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1988). Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model. American Journal of Education, 97(1), 65–108.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990a). America’s public schools: Choice is a panacea. The Brookings Review, 8(3), 4–12.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. E. (1990b). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Cohen, D. K., & Moffitt, S. L. (2010). The ordeal of equality: Did Federal Regulation fix the schools? London: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. W., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Wood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Conant, J. B. (1959). The American high school today: A first report to interested citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1968). Multivariate procedures for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
Coulson, A. J. (2013). New NAEP scores extend dismal trend in U.S. Education productivity. http://www.cato.org/blog/new-naep-scores-extend-dismal-trend-us-education-productivity
Edwards, P. N. (2000). The world in a machine: Origins and impacts of early computerized global systems models. In T. P. Hughes & A. C. Hughes (Eds.), Systems experts and computers (pp. 221–248). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Flanagan, J. C. (1962). Design for a Study of American youth. Washington, DC: Office of Education.
Flanagan, J. C. (1978). Project talent and related efforts to improve secondary education. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa International.
Flanagan, J. C., Dailey, J. T., Shaycroft, M. F., Orr, D. B., & Goldberg, I. (1962). Studies of the American high school. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
Freeman, K. (1996, April 28). John Flanagan, 90, Psychologist who devised pilot aptitude test. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/28/us/john-flanagan-90-psychologist-who-devised-pilot-aptitude-test.html
Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 415–435.
Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2007). Equality of educational opportunity a 40 year retrospective. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, M. Duru-Bellat, & S. Helme (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (pp. 23–47). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gamson, D. (2007). From Progressivism to Federalism: The Pursuit of Equal Educational Opportunity, 1915-1965. In C. Kaestle & A. Lodewick (Eds.), To education a Nationa: Federal and National Strategies of school reform (pp. 177–201). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Goodman, S. M. (1958). The quality measurement project: A research activity conducted by the new York State Education Department. New York: New York State Department of Education.
Gordon, L. N. (2014). Opportunity and results: The coleman report and varied uses of ‘equality of educational opportunity, 1966–1972. Paper presented at History of Education Society Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Hampel, R. L. (1983). The American high school today: James Bryant Conant’s reservations and reconsiderations. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(9), 607–612.
Hartford Courant. (1960, March 12). Talent tests to begin at weaver high. The Hartford Courant. http://search.proquest.com/docview/552553171?accountid=1469
Heyck, H. (2015). Age of system: Understanding the development of modern social science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Hoffer, T., & Coleman, J. S. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
Jencks, C., & Brown, M. (1975). Effects of high schools on their students. Harvard Educational Review, 45(3), 273–324.
Kaestle, C., & Smith, M. (1982). The Federal Role in elementary and secondary education, 1940–1980. Harvard Educational Review, 52(4), 384–408.
Kershaw, J. A., & McKean, R. M. (1959). Systems analysis and education. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
Kett, J. F. (2012). Merit: The history of a founding ideal from the American revolution to the twenty-first century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kiesler, S., & Turner, C. F. (1977). Fundamental research and the process of education: Final report to the National Institute of Education. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Klein, A. (2015, October 22). Who is to blame if NAEP reading and math scores fall? http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2015/10/who_is_to_blame_if_naep_reading_and_math_scores_fall.html?cmp=SOC-SHR-FB
Labaree, D. F. (1992). The making of an American high school: The credentials market and the central high School of Philadelphia, 1838–1939. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
Loveless, T. (2008). The misplaced math student. Washington, DC: Brown Center, Brookings Institute.
Ludwig, M. (1982). A classification of secondary school courses. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
National Education Association of the United States. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education: A report of the commission on the reorganization of secondary education, Appointed by the National Education Association. Bulletin (United States, Bureau of Education), 1918, No. 35. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
NCES (National Center for Educational Statics). (2008). The nation’s report card: Long-term trend 2008. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009479
NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). (1993). 120 Years of American education: A statistical portrait. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf
NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). (2001). Educational achievement of black-white inequality. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001061
NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). (2012). Digest of educational statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_098.asp
O’Connor, A. (2001). Poverty Knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century U.S. history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pallas, A. M., & Alexander, K. L. (1983). Sex differences in quantitative SAT performance: New evidence on the differential coursework hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 165–182.
Peng, S. (1977). National Longitudinal Study of the high school class of 1972. Review and annotation of study reports. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Phillips, C. (2014). The new math and midcentury American politics. Journal of American History, 101(2), 454–479.
Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, P. N., Edwards, C., Sandvig, C. (Forthcoming). Big data is not about size: When data transform scholarship. http://pne.people.si.umich.edu/PDF/Plantin%20et%20al.%202015%20Big%20Data%20is%20not%20about%20Size%20-%20pre-press%20version.pdf.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). A Hierarchical Model for Studying School Effects. Sociology of Education, 59(1), 1–17.
Reed, D. (2014). Building the Federal Schoolhouse: Localism and the American education state. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rivlin, A. M. (1972). Systematic thinking for social action. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Rock, D. A. (2012). Modeling change in large scale longitudinal studies of educational growth: Four decades of contributions to the assessment of growth. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Rodgers, D. T. (2011). Age of fracture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sawchuk, S. (2013, August 7). When bad things happen to good NAEP data. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/07/24/37naep.h32.html
Smeyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2010). Educational research the ethics and aesthetics of statistics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, J. B. (1996). Does an extra year make any difference? The impact of early access to algebra on long-term gains in mathematics attainment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 141–153.
Vinovskis, M. A. (1996). The changing role of the Federal Government in educational research and statistics. History of Education Quarterly, 36(2), 110–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutt, E. (2018). Taking the Long View: Longitudinal Surveys and the Construction of Educational Inequality in America. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: Ethics, Social Justice, and Funding Dynamics. Educational Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73921-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73921-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73920-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73921-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)