Skip to main content

The Firm as Social Institution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Action, Economics, and Ethics

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

Entrepreneurship means that action is something active, creative and human. Pure entrepreneurship is the deployment of the person’s creative capacity in the reality around her. This is a view that implies an extension of economics. Firms occupy a central position as basic institutions in society. It is a dynamic view that shows the firm’s importance as institution in which the lead role is played by the person and the driving force is entrepreneurship.

We can define a criterion of entrepreneurial efficiency based on the enhancement of persons’ possibilities for action. First, an economic, social and cultural system will be more efficient if it increases personal possibilities for action. This first aspect concerns personal freedom of choice. It is the freedom ‘from’. But in the course of this essay we have argued that all individual action has a social dimension and that, as a result, the institutional order is maintained by personal actions. It is the freedom ‘for’. Therefore it is necessary to supplement the criterion of coordination from the social perspective and assert that the more entrepreneurial and social coordination it generates, the more efficient personal action will be. It is the freedom ‘for’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is impossible here to deal with the capabilities approach developed by A. Sen and M. Nussbaum (Nussbaum and Sen 1993). The first point should make the differences—remarkably I would say—between Sen and Nussbaum approaches. For instance, Sen (2009) presents what he considers to be distinctive of his approach, and Nussbaum (2011) does the same. For a general and critical assessment of both approaches see H. Richardson (2000, 2007).

  2. 2.

    P. Koslowski (1996, p. 53) status emphatically that the market allow not only freedom of consumption but also of action and production.

References

  • Baumol W (1968) Entrepreurship in economic theory. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 58:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1993) Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: existence and bounds. J Bus Ventur 8:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1996) Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson M (1982) The entrepreneur. Barnes & Noble Books, Totowa, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I (1979) Perception, opportunity and profit. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I (2000) The driving force of the market. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Augustus Kelly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski P (1996) Ethics of capitalism and critique of sociobiology. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1968) Entrepreneurship and development. Am Econ Rev 58:72–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises L (1996) Human action: a treatise on economics (ed: Greaves BB) (4th rev edn). Foundation for Economic Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (2002) On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Bus Ethics Q 12(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (2005a) Humanizing business: a modern virtue ethics approach. Bus Ethics Q 15(2):237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (2005b) Corporate character: modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Bus Ethics Q 15(4):659–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (2008) Re-imagining the morality of management: a modern virtue ethics approach. Bus Ethics Q 18(4):483–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M, Sen A (1993) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H (2000) Some limitations of Nussbaum’s capabilities. Quinnipiac Law Rev 9:309–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H (2007) The social background of capabilities for freedoms. J Hum Dev 3:388–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1947) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2002) Rationality and freedom. Harvard Belknap Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon RC (1992) Ethics and excellence: cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek FA (1976 [1945]) The use of knowledge in society, in individualism and economic order. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek FA (1989) The pretence of knowledge. Nobel lecture. Am Econ Rev 79:3–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aranzadi, J. (2018). The Firm as Social Institution. In: Human Action, Economics, and Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73912-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics