Advertisement

Biological and Social Factors that Exert an Impact on Decision Making During Working-Out of the Convergent Technologies

  • Evgeny KolbachevEmail author
  • Tatiana Kolbacheva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 722)

Abstract

Authors proved that working out of NBIC technologies and organization of the NBIC-based human-oriented production systems requires applying a number of particular management instruments. These instruments use biological and social factors and parameters as stimuli and criteria. Authors also present concept and methods of applying these instruments that should promote successful reindustrialization processes and harmonic interaction between the humans and technosphere.

Keywords

Convergent technologies Human-Oriented manufacturing Decision-Making Biological factors Social factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Roco, M.C.: Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: opportunities for education and training. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1247–1249 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roco, M., Bainbridge, W.: Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubrovski, D.I.: Subjective reality and the brain: an essay on a theoretical solution to the problem. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 1, 59–69 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mapping the Global Future: Report of the National Intelligence Council’s 2020 Project. GPO, Pittsburgh (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freitas, R.: Economic impact of the personal nanofactory. Nanotechnol. Percept. Rev. Ultraprecis. Eng. Nanotechnol. 2, 111–126 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baez, J.: Subcellular Life Forms (2005). http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/subcellular.html
  7. 7.
    Lifeboat Foundation: NanoShield (2007). http://lifeboat.com/ex/nano.shield
  8. 8.
    Rifkin, J.: The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marsh, P.: The New Industrial Revolution: Consumers, Globalization and the End of Mass Production. Yale University Press, New Haven (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson, C.: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Random House, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelffle, S. (eds.): Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things. European Commission, Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirooka, M.: Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Edward Elgar, Northampton (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmidt, J.C.: NBIC-Interdisciplinary? A Framework for a Critical Reflection on Inter- and Transdisciplinary of NBIC-scenario. Georgia Institute of Technology. Working Paper 26 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nordmann, A.: Converging Technologies – Shaping the Future of European Societies. European Commission, Brussels (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolbachev, E.: Human-oriented manufacturing and reindustrialization processes in the different socio-economic systems. In: Report at the 24th International Conference ICPR-2017, Poznan (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deming, D.: The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. NBER Working Paper (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, Y., Grusky, D.: The payoff to skill in the third industrial revolution. Am. J. Sociol. 118, 1330–1374 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valtukh, K.K.: Informational Theory of Pricing and the Laws of the Non-equilibrium Economy Janus-K. Moscow (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kudrin, B.I.: Structural Diversity of Production and Social System: A Critical Condition for Macroeconomic Development. Report for the RAS Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology, Psychology and Law Section meeting. Moscow (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirshleifer, J.: Where we are in the theory of information? Am. Econ. Rev. 63, 31–39 (1973)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warnecke, H.-J.: Revolution der Unternehmenskultur: Das Fraktale Unternehmen. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mandelbrot, B.: Die fraktale Geometrie der Natur. Birkhauser, Basel (1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Renyi, A.: Dialogues on Mathematics. Holden-Day, New York (1967)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glaziev, S.: Strategy for Growth in the Context of the Global Economic Crisis. EANS-Press, Hannover (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perez, C.: Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yun, O.M.: Production and Logics: The Informational Basis of the Development. Noviy vek, Moscow (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kolbachev, E.: Institutional methodology and the instruments of the natural science for the development of the innovation theory. Manag. Theor. Stud. Rural Bus. Infrastruct. Dev. 36(2), 316–324 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Highsmith, J.A.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic UniversityNovocherkassk, Rostov RegionRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations