Advertisement

Attuning the ‘Pedestrian-Vehicle’ and ‘Driver-Vehicle’ - Why Attributing a Mind to a Vehicle Matters

  • Peter BengtssonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 722)

Abstract

Vehicle automated driving systems, capable of performing all dynamic driving tasks are profoundly changing the traffic environment. With increased automation the vehicles are gradually becoming artificial agents that act and interact in conjunction with human agents, creating a pristine social context. This paper addresses the interaction between ‘pedestrian-vehicle’ and ‘driver-vehicle’. The idea is to make interaction as humanlike as possible, to increase safety and a positive user experience. We suggest that concepts describing social attunement in human-human interaction also can be applied to human-vehicle interaction. Social attunement implies a scenario where human and vehicle share intentions, infer goals of the interaction partner, are mutually predictable, and understand performance limitations. Furthermore, we propose the use of an in-vehicle avatar interface to assist in this interaction. A reason for using an avatar is that it can be hypothesised that the user can interact more naturally with an anthropomorphic artificial agent.

Keywords

Automated driving systems Human agents Artificial agents  Avatar Social attunement 

References

  1. 1.
    Pettersson, I., Rydström, A., Strömberg, H., Hylving, L., Andersson, J., Klingegård, M., Karlsson, M.: Living room on the move: autonomous vehicles and social experiences. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Game-Changing Design, NordiCHI. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casner, S.M., Hutchins, E.L., Norman, D.: The challenges of partially automated driving. Commun. ACM 59(5), 70–77 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., Gordon, C.: Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 371(1693) (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waytz, A., Heafner, J., Epley, N.: The mind in the machine: anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 113–117 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riedl, R., Kenning, P., Mohr, P., Heekeren, H., Davis, F.: Trusting humans and avatars: behavioral and neural evidence. In: 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Shanghai, China, pp. 1148–1158 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richtel, M., Dougherty, C.: Google’s Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers, The New York Times, p. 1, 1 September 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/technology/personaltech/google-says-its-not-the-driverless-cars-fault-its-other-drivers.html
  7. 7.
    Sucha, M., Dostal, D., Risser, R.: Pedestrian-Driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accid. Anal. Prev. 102, 41–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colburn, R.A., Cohen, M.F., Drucker, S.M.: The role of eye gaze in avatar mediated conversational interfaces. Technical report MSR-TR-2000–81, Microsoft Research, 31 July 2000. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2e9a/7e7654d7a1f9c92598f2cc8711dc19addd3c.pdf
  9. 9.
    Zihsler, J., Schwager, D., Hock, P., Szauer, P., Walch, M., Rukzio, E., Dzuba, K.: Carvatar: increasing trust in highly-automated driving through social cues. In: 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 9–14. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering PsychologyLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations