Advertisement

Human Activity Detection Patterns: A Pilot Study for Unobtrusive Discovery of Daily Working Routine

  • Hicham RifaiEmail author
  • Paula Kelly
  • Yoshiki Shoji
  • Damon Berry
  • Matteo Zallio
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 722)

Abstract

Information technology is increasingly becoming an integral part of contemporary life. Most tasks that are performed over the course of a day, involve the use of different types of connected devices. About two billion contemporary consumers use smartphones [1]. These smartphones contain a variety of sensors that can collect information about their users such as their mobility patterns, daily activities and occupancy patterns [2]. Occupancy is an important aspect in developing responsive environments and for optimizing building performance. This work investigates the extent to which smartphones can be used to collect occupancy data in a work environment, compared to another method that uses smart power outlets for collecting occupancy data. The resultant data sets are validated against register entries, which are recorded manually by participants each time they change their occupancy state.

Keywords

Activity recognition Human factors Human-systems integration Energy consumption detection Bluetooth User-centered design Privacy Assistive technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews, S., Ellis, D., Shaw, H., Piwek, L.: Beyond self-report: tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLoS One 10, e0139004 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harari, G., Lane, N., Wang, R., Crosier, B., Campbell, A., Gosling, S.: Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 838–854 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunay, H., O’Brien, W., Beausoleil-Morrison, I.: A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Build. Environ. 70, 31–47 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, L., Peng, Y., Wang, S., Liu, M., Huang, Z.: Complex activity recognition using time series pattern dictionary learned from ubiquitous sensors. Inf. Sci. 340–341, 41–57 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun, K., Yan, D., Hong, T., Guo, S.: Stochastic modeling of overtime occupancy and its application in building energy simulation and calibration. Build. Environ. 79, 1–12 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahdavi, A., Tahmasebi, F.: Predicting people’s presence in buildings: an empirically based model performance analysis. Energy Build. 86, 349–355 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersen, P., Iversen, A., Madsen, H., Rode, C.: Dynamic modeling of presence of occupants using inhomogeneous Markov chains. Energy Build. 69, 213–223 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andanedo, L., Feldheim, V.: Accurate occupancy detection of an office room from light, temperature, humidity and CO2 measurements using statistical learning models. Energy Build. 112, 28–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balaji, B., Xu, J., Nwokafor, A., Gupta, R., Yuvraj Agarwal, Y.: Sentinel: occupancy based HVAC actuation using existing WiFi infrastructure within commercial buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen, K., Melfi, R., Nordman, B., Rosenblum, B., Viera, R.: Using existing network infrastructure to estimate building occupancy and control plugged-in devices in user workspaces. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Distrib. Syst. 12, 4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rana, R., Kusy, B., Wall, J., Hu, W.: Novel activity classification and occupancy estimation methods for intelligent HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) systems. Energy 93, 245–255 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lam, K., Zhao, J., Wirick, J., Qi, M.: An EnergyPlus whole building energy model calibration method for office buildings using occupant behavior data. In: 2014 ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference, pp. 160–167 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Review: Belkin WeMo Switch and Motion. https://www.wired.com/2013/03/belkin-wemo/. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
  14. 14.
    Pradeep, L., Ambati, R., Irwin, D.: AutoPlug: an automated metadata service for smart outlets. In: Green and Sustainable Computing Conference, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matteo, Z., McGrory, J., Berry, D.: IoT based recipes for enabling senior citizens: stakeholders views on how integration of IoT and web services can enhance well-being and inclusion of older people. In: Proceedings of the International Design for Inclusion, AHFE 2017. Springer (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hicham Rifai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paula Kelly
    • 1
  • Yoshiki Shoji
    • 1
  • Damon Berry
    • 1
  • Matteo Zallio
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sustainability and Health InstituteDublin Institute of TechnologyDublin 7Ireland

Personalised recommendations