Advertisement

Significance of Social Factors for Effective Implementation of Smart Energy Management Systems in End-User Households

  • Jaroslaw KowalskiEmail author
  • Cezary Biele
  • Marek Mlodozeniec
  • Marcel Geers
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 722)

Abstract

Rising popularity of photovoltaic panels and other equipment allowing the electricity production in households evoke the new challenges – i.e. high energy exchange due to high production or usage peaks. One of the solution to such problems is the Energy Management System (EMS) which is able to monitor and report real-time power consumption. EMS allows for launching a whole range of new features – i.e. flexible tariffs or automatic scheduling of home appliances starting time. In this paper we present the results coming from social research conducted within project “e-balance - balancing energy production and consumption in energy efficient smart neighborhoods” realized within European 7FP. We outline four areas of potential social barriers for EMS adoption: engagement, unwillingness to leave appliances unattended, division of roles in the household and privacy concerns. Concluding, our studies indicate that the inclusion of the human perspective is necessary for the effective implementation of Energy Management Systems.

Keywords

Human factors Smart Grids Technology adoption 

References

  1. 1.
    Cavoukian, A., Polonetsky, J., Wolf, C.: Smart privacy for the smart grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation. Identity Inf. Soc. 3(2), 275–294 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vaughan, A.: Solar power growth leaps by 50% worldwide thanks to US and China (2017). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/07/solar-power-growth-worldwide-us-china-uk-europe
  3. 3.
    Kobus, C.: A switch by design. User-centered design of smart energy technologies to change habits of using energy at home. Dissertation Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quinn, E.: Smart metering & privacy: existing law and competing policies. A report for the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Denver (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greveler, U., Justus, B., Loehr, D.: Forensic content detection through power consumption. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications 2012, pp. 6759–6763, IEEE Press, Ottawa (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flexibility from residential power consumption: a new market filled with opportunities (2016). https://www.usef.energy/app/uploads/2016/12/EnergieKoplopersEngels_FinalReport_2016_vs4-1.pdf
  7. 7.
    Akshay Uttama Nambi, S.N., Venkatesha Prasad, R.: Toward the development of a techno-social smart grid. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54(11), 202–209 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shadbolt, N.R., Smith, D.A., Simperl, E., Van Kleek, M., Yang, Y., Hall, W.: Towards a classification framework for social machines. In: WWW 2013 Companion Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 905–912 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaroslaw Kowalski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cezary Biele
    • 1
  • Marek Mlodozeniec
    • 1
  • Marcel Geers
    • 2
  1. 1.National Information Processing InstituteWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Alliander N.V.DuivenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations