Advertisement

Introduction

  • Charles Crothers
Chapter
Part of the Sociology Transformed book series (SOTR)

Abstract

A conceptual framework for analysing a ‘national sociology’ is sketched which suggests that knowledge projects move through several stages from problem-choices, through mobilisations of theories, methodologies, resources and data—to produce a variety of types (genres) of outputs for a variety of audiences. Some of the key features of NZ society over time which might shape the development of NZ sociology are outlined, with an emphasis on periods when NZ was seen as a ‘social laboratory’. In turn, the configuration of the NZ university system over time is outlined as the environment within which academic programmes are framed. The methods used in developing this historical sociology study are described and its opportunities and limitations argued. Given the substantial wealth of information available, it is possible to highlight the considerable extension of sociology across many sites within universities and to trace the rise and fall of sociologies and departments over time.

Keywords

Sociology of sociology New Zealand Sociology of knowledge production National sociology, ‘social laboratory’, study methods 

References

  1. Austrin, T., & Farnsworth, J. (2007). Assembling sociologies: Following disciplinary formations in and across the social sciences. New Zealand Sociology, 22(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  2. Ballantyne, T. (2012). Webs of empire: Locating New Zealand’s colonial past. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burdon, R. (1966). New Zealand society: Its characteristics. Encylopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved from https://teara.govt.nz/en/1966/new-zealand-society-its-characteristics
  4. Coleman, P. (1987). Progressivism and the world of reform. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Australia: Allen &Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Crothers, C. (2005a). History of New Zealand sociology. In J. Gemov et al. (Eds.), History of Australian sociology (pp. 67–80). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crothers, C. (2005b). Mapping the social sciences by exploring Performance-Based Research Fund data: Characteristics of New Zealand academic social sciences research outputs. In L. Bakker, J. Boston, L. Campbell, & R. Smyth (Eds.), Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund: Framing the debate 2006 (pp. 185–209). Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
  8. Crothers, C. (2006). Mapping the social sciences: Characteristics of academic research outputs. Building Research Capacity in the Social Sciences: Occasional Paper 3, 22pp.Google Scholar
  9. Crothers, C. (2008a). New Zealand sociology textbooks. Current Sociology, 56(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crothers, C. (2008b). The state of New Zealand sociology: An updated profile. New Zealand Sociology, 23(1), 3–29.Google Scholar
  11. Crothers, C. (2010a). New Zealand sociology in a neo-liberal era: Strands of political economy in New Zealand social science. In M. Burawoy, M. K. Chang, & M. F. Hsieh (Eds.), Facing an unequal world: Challenges for a global sociology (Vol. II, pp. 228–243). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica, Council of National Associations of the ISA, and Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  12. Crothers, C. (2010b). Reproducing the center at the periphery: Antipodean traditions of sociology. In S. Patel (Ed.), The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions (pp. 346–357). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crothers, C. (2011). Editorial: Status of New Zealand sociology. New Zealand Sociology, 26(2), 4–9.Google Scholar
  14. Crothers, C. (2012). Most influential sociological materials on New Zealand: An editorial reporting bibliometric voting. New Zealand Sociology, 27(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
  15. Crothers, C. (2013a). Editorial: International Year of Statistics 2013. New Zealand Sociology, 28(2), 3–20.Google Scholar
  16. Crothers, C. (2013b). Appendix: The New Zealand literature on social class/inequality. New Zealand Sociology, 28(Special Issue on Class/Inequality), 320–354.Google Scholar
  17. Crothers, C. (2014). History of New Zealand Sociology: An introductory editorial. New Zealand Sociology, 29(4), 2–25.Google Scholar
  18. Crothers, C. (2016). The development of sociology in New Zealand within the contemporary political economy: Where to now? New Zealand Sociology, 31(7), 250–259.Google Scholar
  19. Crothers, C. (2017). New Zealand graduates with sociology degrees. New Zealand Sociology, 32(1), 97–103.Google Scholar
  20. Crothers, C., & Gribben, C. (1986). The state of New Zealand sociology: Some preliminary observations. New Zealand Sociology, 1(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  21. Crothers, C., & Pavlich, G. (Eds.). (1995). Directions in sociology for New Zealand/Aotearoa. New Zealand Sociology, 10(1), 63–66.Google Scholar
  22. Crothers, C., & Robb, J. (1985). New Zealand. In UNESCO sociology and social anthropology in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 460–508). New Delhi: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Crothers, C., Tait, D., Waghorne, M., & Dwyer, T. (1981). Applied sociology: The future of the discipline. Paper presented to Sociological Association of Australia and New Zealand, Christchurch, November 1981, 9pp.Google Scholar
  24. Curtis, B. (2007). Academic life: Commodification, continuity, collegiality, confusion and the Performance-Based Research Fund. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 32(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Curtis, B. (2017). The rise and rise of the Performance-Based Research Fund? In C. Shore & S. Wright (Eds.), Death of the public university?: Uncertain futures for higher education in the knowledge economy (Chap. 9). Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  26. David-Ives, C. (2015). André Siegfried in New Zealand: A racialist vision of social progress. Journal of New Zealand & Pacific Studies, 3(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleck, C. (2015). The study of the history of sociology and neighboring fields. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44(3), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gidlow, B., & Spoonley, P. (1993). Symposium: The funding of social science research in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 8(2), 190–237.Google Scholar
  29. Hamer, D. (Ed.). (1974). The Webbs in New Zealand, 1898: Beatrice Webb’s diary with entries by Sidney Webb (2nd ed.). Wellington: Price Milburn for Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hancock, M., Robb, J., & Thompson, R. (1996). The establishment of sociology in New Zealand: A ‘founders’ retrospect. New Zealand Sociology, 11(2), 317–333.Google Scholar
  31. Hansen, D. (1965). Sociology and social research in New Zealand. Sociology and Social Research, 50(1), 36–46.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, J. E. (2010). Honouring the contract. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McManus, R. (2006). Shifting practices in New Zealand sociology. New Zealand Sociology, 21(2), 270–288.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K., & Wolfe, A. (1995). The cultural and social incorporation of sociological knowledge. American Sociologist, 26(3), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mol, H. (1968). Sociology in Australia and New Zealand. American Sociologist, 3(2), 146–147.Google Scholar
  36. Rodgers, D. T. (2000). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Royal Society of New Zealand. (2014). Our futures. Te Pae Tawhiti. Wellington: RSNZ.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, W. H. (1978). Australia and NZ Sociology, 1971–78: An introduction. Clayton, VIC: Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Monash University and SAANZ.Google Scholar
  39. Shuker, R. (2001). Site-ing New Zealand cultural studies: The evolution of SITES. New Zealand Sociology, 16(2), 77–90.Google Scholar
  40. Siegfried, A. (1914). Democracy in New Zealand. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  41. Spoonley, P. (Ed.). (2003). Special issue: Graeme Fraser and New Zealand sociology. New Zealand Sociology, 18(1).Google Scholar
  42. Spoonley, P. (2016). Has Gramsci left the building? New Zealand Sociology, 31(7), 246–249.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, J. N. (1974). The Institute of Pacific relations: Asian scholars and American politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, R. (1972). The development of sociology in New Zealand. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 8(3), 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson, R. H. T. (1967). Sociology in New Zealand. Sociology and Social Research, 5(4), 503–508.Google Scholar
  46. Thorns, D. C. (2003). The challenge of doing sociology in a global world: The case of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Current Sociology, 51(6), 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tolich, M., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (2015). The politicisation of ethics review in New Zealand. Auckland: Dunmore.Google Scholar
  48. Witten, K. (2006). Building Research Capability in the Social Sciences (BRCSS): National survey of social scientists 2006. BRCSS Network.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Crothers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations