Advertisement

Diffusion Orientation Histograms (DOH) for Diffusion Weighted Image Analysis

  • Laurent Chauvin
  • Kuldeep Kumar
  • Christian Desrosiers
  • Jacques De Guise
  • Matthew Toews
Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel keypoint descriptor for Diffusion Weighted Image(DWI) analysis, the Diffusion Orientation Histogram (DOH). The DOH descriptor quantizes local diffusion gradients into histograms over spatial location and orientation, in a manner analogous to the quantization of image gradients in the widely used Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) technique. Diffusion gradient symmetry allows representing half of the orientation space at double the angular resolution, leading to a compact but highly informative descriptor. Quantitative preliminary experiments evaluate descriptors for the task of automatically identifying familial links (twins, non-twin siblings) from DWI keypoint correspondences. The DOH descriptor is found to be complementary to traditional HOG descriptors computed from scalar fractional anisotropy (FA) images, where concatenated DOH and HOG descriptors result in the highest rates of correct family member identification. Twin-twin descriptor correspondences are generally more concentrated about major white matter tracts, e.g. the internal capsule, in comparison to twin/non-twin sibling correspondences.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, D., Barker, G., Arridge, S.: Detection and modeling of non-gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn. Reson. Med. 48(2), 331–340 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basser, P.J., Pajevic, S., Pierpaoli, C., Duda, J., Aldroubi, A.: In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 44(4), 625–632 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, A.J., Sejnowski, T.J.: The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vis. Res. 37(23), 3327–3338 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., Fua, P.: Brief: binary robust independent elementary features. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 778–792. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cory, D.: Measurement of translational displacement probabilities by NMR: an indicator of compartmentation. Magn. Reson. Med. 14(3), 435–444 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cover, T., Hart, P.: Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13(1), 21–27 (1967)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 886–893. IEEE, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Descoteaux, M., Deriche, R., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.F., Poupon, C.: Diffusion propagator imaging: using laplaces equation and multiple shell acquisitions to reconstruct the diffusion propagator. In: International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 1–13. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong, J., Soatto, S.: Domain-size pooling in local descriptors: DSP-SIFT. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5097–5106 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Einstein, A.: On the movement of small particles suspended in stationary liquids required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat. Ann. Phys. 17, 549–560 (1905)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garyfallidis, E., Brett, M., Amirbekian, B., Rokem, A., Van Der Walt, S., Descoteaux, M., Nimmo-Smith, I.: Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160(1), 106–154 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jahanshad, N., Aganj, I., Lenglet, C., Joshi, A., Jin, Y., Barysheva, M., McMahon, K.L., de Zubicaray, G.I., Martin, N.G., Wright, M.J., et al.: Sex differences in the human connectome: 4-tesla high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) tractography in 234 young adult twins. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 939–943. IEEE, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., Laval-Jeantet, M.: MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 161(2), 401–407 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.F., Poupon, C., Clark, C.A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., Chabriat, H.: Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13(4), 534–546 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindeberg, T.: Scale-space theory: a basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales. J. Appl. Stat. 21(1–2), 225–270 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2), 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muja, M., Lowe, D.G.: Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. VISAPP (1). 2(331–340), 2 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmid, C., Mikolajczyk, K.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 257–263 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stejskal, E.O., Tanner, J.E.: Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 42(1), 288–292 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toews, M., Wells, W.M.: Efficient and robust model-to-image alignment using 3d scale-invariant features. Med. Image Anal. 17(3), 271–282 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toews, M., Wells, W.M.: How are siblings similar? How similar are siblings? Large-scale imaging genetics using local image features. In: 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 847–850. IEEE, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Essen, D.C., Ugurbil, K., Auerbach, E., Barch, D., Behrens, T., Bucholz, R., Chang, A., Chen, L., Corbetta, M., Curtiss, S.W., et al.: The human connectome project: a data acquisition perspective. Neuroimage 62(4), 2222–2231 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng, L., Yang, Y., Tian, Q.: SIFT meets CNN: a decade survey of instance retrieval. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PP(99) (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Chauvin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kuldeep Kumar
    • 1
  • Christian Desrosiers
    • 1
  • Jacques De Guise
    • 2
  • Matthew Toews
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial IntelligenceÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Laboratoire de recherche en imagerie et orthopédie (LIO)École de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations