We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Towards Grounded Enterprise Modelling

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10697))

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the concept of grounding enterprise models in terms of an underlying fact-based model, as a way to add more meaning to these enterprise models. We motivate the need for doing so in terms of a fundamental understanding of conceptual modelling, and enterprise modelling in particular. We also clarify why, next to e.g. adding more meaning by using formal semantics, or mapping the model to a foundational ontology, it remains important to ground enterprise models on fact-based models that capture the natural way in which people converse about/in their domain. The presented concepts are illustrated by means of a running example, while also reflecting on, and summarising, the results of earlier experiments in grounding different enterprise models.

This work has been partially sponsored by the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (www.fnr.lu), via the ValCoLa and CoBALab projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In principle, we would prefer to use the word “semantics” here. However, since the word “semantics”, in our computer science oriented community, tends to be equated to only mean “formal semantics”, we will use the word meaning.

  2. 2.

    More colloquially also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

  3. 3.

    To keep the diagram clean, we have omitted all of the so-called reference schemes, which identify how e.g. a Doctor or a Patient is referred to in this domain.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham, R., Niemietz, H., de Kinderen, S., Aier, S.: Can boundary objects mitigate communication defects in enterprise transformation? Findings from expert interviews. In: Jung, R., Reichert, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2013). LNI, vol. 222, pp. 27–40. Gesellschaft für Informatiek, Bonn (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjeković, M., Proper, H.A., Sottet, J.-S.: Embracing pragmatics. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 431–444. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjeković, M., Proper, H.A., Sottet, J.-S.: Enterprise modelling languages – just enough standardisation? In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2013. LNBIP, vol. 173, pp. 1–23. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06671-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjeković, M., Sottet, J.S., Favre, J.M., Proper, H.A.: A framework for natural enterprise modelling. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2013), pp. 79–84. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Bommel, P., Buitenhuis, P.G., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A.: Architecture principles – a regulative perspective on enterprise architecture. In: Reichert, M., Strecker, S., Turowski, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2007). LNI, no. 119, pp. 47–60. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Bommel, P., Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Object-oriented modeling based on logbooks. Comput. J. 39(9), 793–799 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: On the use of object-role modeling for modeling active domains. In: Research Issues in System Analysis and Design, Databases and Software Development, pp. 123–145. IGI Publishing, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: On the use of object-role modelling to model active domains. In: Halpin, T.A., Krogstie, J., Proper, H.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2008), Held in Conjunction with the 20th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2008), Montpellier, France, vol. 337, pp. 473–484. CEUR-WS.org, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falkenberg, E.D., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., Voss, K., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B.E., Oei, J.L.H., Rolland, C., Stamper, R.K. (eds.): A Framework of Information Systems Concepts. IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO, IFIP, Laxenburg, Austria (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guizzardi, G.: On ontology, ontologies, conceptualizations, modeling languages, and (meta)models. In: Vasilecas, O., Eder, J., Caplinskas, A. (eds.) Databases and Information Systems IV - Selected Papers from the Seventh International Baltic Conference, DB&IS 2006, 3–6 July 2006, Vilnius, Lithuania. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 155, pp. 18–39. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halpin, T.A., Morgan, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases. Data Management Systems, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Proper, H.A.: How to formalize it? Formalization principles for information systems development methods. Inf. Softw. Technol. 40(10), 519–540 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Freezing language; conceptualisation processes in ICT supported organisations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: A fundamental view on the process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11568322_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: Understanding the requirements on modelling techniques. In: Pastor, O., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431855_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Iacob, M.E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Quartel, D.A.C.: ArchiMate 2.0 Specification. The Open Group (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Technical Committee on Data management and interchange: Information processing systems – Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base. Technical report. ISO/TR 9007:1987, ISO (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Jonkers, H.: The anatomy of the ArchiMate language. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Design (IJISMD) 1(1), 1–32 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magalhães, R., Proper, H.A.: Model-enabled design and engineering of organisations. Organ. Design Enterp. Eng. 1(1), 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, P.Y., Turner, B.A.: Grounded theory and organizational research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22(2), 141–157 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules (SBVR). Technical report. dtc/06-03-02, Object Management Group, Needham, Massachusetts, March 2006

    Google Scholar 

  23. OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation, V2.0. Technical report. OMG Document Number: formal/2011-01-03, Object Management Group, January 2011

    Google Scholar 

  24. Proper, H.A.: Grounded Enterprise Modelling. DaVinci Series, Nijmegen Institute for Information and Computing Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Proper, H.A., Bleeker, A.I., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Object-role modelling as a domain modelling approach. In: Grundspenkis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2004), Held in Conjunctiun with the 16th Conference on Advanced Information Systems 2004 (CAiSE 2004), Riga, Latvia, vol. 3, pp. 317–328, June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  26. Proper, H.A., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., van der Weide, T.P.: A fact-oriented approach to activity modeling. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 666–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: EVORM – a conceptual modelling technique for evolving application domains. Data Knowl. Eng. 12, 313–359 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rothenberg, J.: The nature of modeling. In: Artificial Intelligence, Simulation & Modeling, pp. 75–92. Wiley, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scheer, A.W., Schneider, K.: ARIS - architecture of integrated information systems. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 605–623. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26661-5_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Stachowiak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, Vienna (1973)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Thalheim, B.: The theory of conceptual models, the theory of conceptual modelling and foundations of conceptual modelling. In: Embley, D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Handbook of Conceptual Modeling, pp. 543–577. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Tohidian, I.: Examining linguistic relativity hypothesis as one of the main views on the relationship between language and thought. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 38(1), 65–74 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tulinayo, P.F., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.S., Proper, H.A.: Integrating system dynamics with object-role modeling. In: Stirna, J., Persson, A. (eds.) PoEM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 15, pp. 77–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89218-2_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Tulinayo, F.P., van Bommel, P., Proper, H.A.: Enhancing the system dynamics modeling proces with a domain modeling method. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 22(02), 1350011 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wyssusek, B.: On ontological foundations of conceptual modelling. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 63–80 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henderik A. Proper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Proper, H.A., Bjeković, M., van Gils, B., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A. (2018). Towards Grounded Enterprise Modelling. In: Debruyne, C., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Workshops. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10697. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73804-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73805-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics