Skip to main content

Hybrid Production-System Control-Architecture for Smart Manufacturing

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Workshops (OTM 2017)

Abstract

Highly customized products with shorter life cycles characterize the market today: the smart manufacturing paradigm can answer these needs. In this latter production system context, the interaction between production resources (PRs) can be swiftly adapted to meet both the variety of customers’ needs and the optimization goals. In the scientific literature, several architectural configurations have been devised so far to this aim, namely: hierarchical, heterarchical or hybrid. Whether the hierarchical and heterarchical architectures provide respectively low reactivity and a reduced vision of the optimization opportunities at production system level, the hybrid architectures can mitigate the limit of both the previous architectures. However, no hybrid architecture can ensure all PRs are aware of how orienting their behavior to achieve the optimization goal of the manufacturing system with a minimal computational effort. In this paper, a new “hybrid architecture” is proposed to meet this goal. At each order entry, this architecture allows the PRs to be dynamically grouped. Each group has a supervisor, i.e. the optimizer, that has the responsibility: (1) to monitor the tasks on all the resources, (2) to compute the optimal manufacturing parameters and (3) to provide the optimization results to the resources of the group. A software prototype was developed to test the new architecture design in a simulated flow-shop and in a simplified job shop production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dassisti, M., De Nicolò, M.: Enterprise integration and economical crisis for mass craftsmanship: a case study of an Italian furniture company. In: Herrero, P., Panetto, H., Meersman, R., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7567, pp. 113–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33618-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Sci. Eng. 8(1), 37–44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kagermann, H., et al.: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dassisti, M., et al.: Industry 4.0 paradigm: the viewpoint of the small and medium enterprises. In: 7th International Conference on Information Society and Technology, ICIST 2017, Kopaonik, Serbia, vol. 1, pp. 50–54 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trentesaux, D.: Distributed control of production systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22(7), 971–978 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Panetto, H., Zdravković, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Romero, D., Cecil, J., Mezgár, I.: New perspectives for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Comput. Ind. 79, 47–63 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfrommer, J., Stogl, D., Aleksandrov, K., Escaida, N.S., Hein, B., Beyerer, J.: Plug & produce by modelling skills and service-oriented orchestration of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. At-Automatisierungstechnik 63(10), 790–800 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., Gorecky, D.: Towards Industry 4.0 standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3), 579–584 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leitão, P., Restivo, F.: ADACOR: a holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control. Comput. Ind. 57(2), 121–130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., Adam, E., Trentesaux, D.: Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: the ADACOR evolution. Comput. Ind. 66, 99–111 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pach, C., Berger, T., Bonte, T., Trentesaux, D.: ORCA-FMS: a dynamic architecture for the optimized and reactive control of flexible manufacturing scheduling. Comput. Ind. 65(4), 706–720 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jimenez, J.-F., Bekrar, A., Zambrano-Rey, G., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P.: Pollux: a dynamic hybrid control architecture for flexible job shop systems. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1–19 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zambrano Rey, G., Pach, C., Aissani, N., Bekrar, A., Berger, T., Trentesaux, D.: The control of myopic behavior in semi-heterarchical production systems: a holonic framework. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(2), 800–817 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rolón, M., Martínez, E.: Agent-based modeling and simulation of an autonomic manufacturing execution system. Comput. Ind. 63(1), 53–78 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maturana, F., Shen, W., Norrie, D.H.: MetaMorph: an adaptive agent-based architecture for intelligent manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37(10), 2159–2173 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heragu, S.S., Graves, R.J., Kim, B.-I., St Onge, A.: Intelligent agent based framework for manufacturing systems control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part Syst. Hum. 32(5), 560–573 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ou-Yang, C., Lin, J.S.: The development of a hybrid hierarchical/heterarchical shop floor control system applying bidding method in job dispatching. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 14(3), 199–217 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox, J.S., Durfee, E.H.: Discovering and exploiting synergy between hierarchical planning agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 281–288 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Brussel, H., Wyns, J., Valckenaers, P., Bongaerts, L., Peeters, P.: Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput. Ind. 37(3), 255–274 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially supported by Gestal 2000 Srl which committed to InResLab Scarl the project “GEM - Gestal Energy Management”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Dassisti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dassisti, M., Giovannini, A., Merla, P., Chimienti, M., Panetto, H. (2018). Hybrid Production-System Control-Architecture for Smart Manufacturing. In: Debruyne, C., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Workshops. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10697. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73804-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73805-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics