Skip to main content

Barriers to Women’s Power and Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perceptions of Self, Power, & Gender Among Muslim Women
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the barriers to women’s power and agency. It also reviews some theoretical constructs related to barriers to power. In addition, this chapter juxtaposes these theoretical constructs with those of informants’ narratives and life stories, and argues that there are religio-cultural practices and socio-structural constraints that make women of Chandhara less powerful than men. This chapter mainly engages discourses and theories of power, such as Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz’s, and Steven Lukes’, in discussing barriers to (women’s) power and agency. This chapter engages the religious discourses of the early days of Islam that incorporates folk traditions in interpreting the foundations of the Islamic creed that tend to view women negatively. In addition, it describes institutional, social, and cultural barriers to women’s power and agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abou-Bakr, Omaima. 2015. “The Interpretive Legacy of Qiwamah as an Exegetical Construct.” In Men in Charge? Rethinking Authority in Muslim Legal Tradition, edited by Ziba Mir-Hosseini, Mulki Al-Sharmani, and Jana Rumminger, 44–64. London, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Leila. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, S. M. Shamsul. 1998. “Women in the Era of Modernity and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Case of Taslima Nasrin of Bangladesh.” Signs 23 (2): 429–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Abdullah Yusuf. 2001. The Holy Qur’an: Text, Translation and Commentary. New York: Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Ahmed. 1984. Al-Qur’an: A Contemporary Translation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Cheragh. 1883. The Proposed Political, Legal, and Social Reforms in the Ottoman Empire and Other Mohammadan States. Bombay, India: Education Society’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amer, Sahar. 2014. What is Veiling? Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjum, Ovamir. 2007. “Islam as a Discursive Tradition: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (3): 656–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • An-Na‘im, Abdullahi A. 1990. Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • An-Na‘im, Adullahi A. 2008. Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arens, Jenneke. 2014. Women, Land and Power in Bangladesh: Jhagrapur Revisited. Dhaka, Bangladesh: The University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1983. “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz.” Man, New Series 18 (2): 237–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1986. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam.” Occasional Papers Series, Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, Mahmoud M. 1984. The Qur’an and Its Interpreters, vol. 1. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (December): 947–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter and Morton S. Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiar, Laleh. 2007. The Sublime Quran. www.islamicworld.com.

  • Barlas, Asma. 2002. Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Iysa A. 1989. The Medieval Islamic Controversy Between Philosophy and Orthodoxy: Ijma‘ and Ta’wil in the Conflict Between Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushed. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocci, Peter J. 1990. “Models of Solidarity, Structures of Power: The Politics of Community in Rural Bangladesh.” In Political Anthropology Yearbook 1, edited by Myron J. Aronoff, 97–125. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocci, Peter J. 2001. “Islam and Social Construction of the Bangladesh Countryside.” In Understanding the Bengal Muslims: Interpretative Essays, edited by Rafiuddin Ahmed, 71–85. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouhdiba, Abdelwahab. 1985 [1975]. Sexuality in Islam. Translated by Alan Sheridan. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jonathan A. C. 2009. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, Gabriele vom. 2002. “Elusive Bodies: The Politics of Aesthetics Among Yemeni Elite Women.” In Gender, Politics, and Islam, edited by Therese Saliba, Carolyn Allen, and Judith A. Howard, 161–200. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucar, Elizabeth. 2012. The Islamic Veil: A Beginner’s Guide. London, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderini, Simonetta. 2009. “Contextualizing Arguments about Female Ritual Leadership (Women Imamas) in Classical Islamic Sources.” Comparative Islamic Studies 5 (1): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Linda. 2003. “Hijab According to Hadith: Text and Interpretation.” In The Muslim Veil in North America: Issues and Debates, edited by Sajida S. Alavi, Homa Hoodfar, and Sheila McDonough, 214–86. Toronto: Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, Vincent J. 1998. Realm of the Saint: Power and Authority in Moroccan Sufism. Austin: University Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, Renee. 1988. Political Powerlessness: Agricultural Workers in Post-War England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sondy, Amanullah. 2015. The Crisis of Islamic Masculinities. London: Bloomsburgy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderija, Adis. 2011. Constructing a Religiously Ideal “Believer” and “Woman.” In Islam: Neo-Traditional Salafi and Progressive Muslims’ Methods of Interpretation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Fadl, Khaled A. 2001. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Guindi, Fadwa. 1999. Veil: Modesty, Privacy, and Resistance. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Shamsy, Ahmed. 2008. “The Social Construction of Orthodoxy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, edited by Tim Winter, 97–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineer, Asghar A. 1992. The Rights of Women in Islam. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineer, Asghar A. 2004. The Rights of Women in Islam, 2nd edn. New Delhi: New Dawn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, John L. 1982. Women in Muslim Family Law. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, John L. 1988. Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, Joseph van. 2006. The Flowering of Muslim Theology. Translated by Jane M. Todd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1968. “‘Power’ in the Recent Writings of Talcott Parsons.” Sociology 2 (September): 257–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Thomas F. 1979. Islamic and Christian Spain in the Early Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Shalom. 1995. The Wiles of Women the Wiles of Men: Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife in Ancient Near Eastern, Jewish, and Islamic Folklore. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldziher, Ignaz. 1981 [1910]. Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. Translated by Andras and Ruth Hamori. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, Wael B. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi, Taj I. 2000. Women and Islam in Bangladesh: Beyond Subjugation and Tyranny. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, Fred. 2000. Clifford Geertz: Culture, Custom and Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juynboll, G. H. A. 1969. The Authenticity of the Tradition Literature: Discussions in Modern Egypt. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 2005 [1974]. Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik’s Muwatta. Translated by A. Abdurrahman and Y. Johnson, available at http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muwatta/.

  • Mannan, Manzurul. 2015. BRAC, Global Policy Language, and Women in Bangladesh: Transformation and Manipulation. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maududi, Abul A. 1979. Purdah and the Status of Woman in Islam, 4th edn. Edited and translated by Al-Ash‘ari. Lahore, Pakistan: Islamic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, Fatima. 1987 [1975]. Beyond the Veil: Male-Female Dynamics in Modern Muslim Society, rev. edn. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, Fatima. 1991. Women in Islam: A Historical and Theological Enquiry. Translated by Mary J. Lackland. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, Fatima. 1991 [1987]. The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminists Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Translated by Mary J. Lakeland. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, Fatima. 1993. The Forgotten Queens of Islam. Translated by Mary J. Lakeland. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, Fatima. 2001. Scheherazade Goes West: Different Cultures, Different Harems. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, Barbara D. 1990. Perfecting Women: Maulana Ashraf ‘Ali Thanawi’s Bihisti Zewar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. 2007. “Islam and Gender Justice.” In Voices of Islam, five vols., edited by Vincent J. Cornell, 5: 85–113. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. 2015. “Muslim Legal Tradition and the Challenge of Gender Equality.” In Men in Charge? Rethinking Authority in Muslim Legal Tradition, edited by Ziba Mir-Hosseini, Mulki al-Sharmani, and Jana Rumminger, 13–43. London: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murshid, Tazeen M. 2002. “Law, the Colonial State and the Treatment of Women with Some Comparisons with Mughal India.” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Humanities) 47 (2): 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peletz, Michael G. 1993. “Sacred Texts and Dangerous Words: The Politics of Law and Cultural Rationalization in Malaysia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 35 (1): 66–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozario, Santi. 2002. “Grameen Bank-Style Microcredit: Impact on Dowry and Women’s Solidarity.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255651556_Grameen_Bankstyle_microcredit_Impact_on_dowry_and_women’s_solidarity. Accessed 30 December 2016.

  • Sahih Bukhari. Translated by M. Muhsin Khan, available at http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/.

  • Sahih Muslim. Translated A. R. Siddiqui, available at http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim.

  • Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serajuddin, Alamgir M. 2001. Shari‘a Law and Society: Tradition and Change in South Asia. Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraji, Faegheh. 2001. The Veil Unveiled: The Hijab in Modern Culture. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi, Dina M. 2011a. “Islam, Gender and the Nation: The Social Life of Bangladeshi Fatwas,” In Communalism and Globalization in South Asia and Its Diaspora, edited by Deana Heath and Chandana Mathur, 181–203. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi, Dina M. 2011b. “Crime and Punishment: Laws of Seduction, Consent, and Rape in Bangladesh.” Social Difference-Online 1: 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Margaret. 1931. Studies in Early Mysticism in the Near and Middle East. London: The Sheldon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Margaret. 1950. Readings From the Mystics of Islam: Translation From the Arabic and Persian, Together With a Short Account of the History and Doctrines of Sufism and Brief Biographical Notes on Each Sufi Writer. London: Luzac & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Devin J. 1998. Islamic Legal Orthodoxy: Twelver Shiite Responses to the Sunni Legal System. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowasser, Barbara F. 1994. Women in the Qur’an, Traditions, and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowasser, Barbara. 1998. “Gender Issues and Contemporary Quran Interpretation.” In Islam, Gender, & Social Change, edited by Yvonne Y. Haddad and John L. Esposito, 30–44. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bhagavadgita with the Sanatsugatiya and the Anugita. In The Sacred Books of the East, vol. 8, 2nd edn. Translated by K. T. Telang, and edited by Friedrich M. Muller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Maha-Parinibbana Suttanta. In The Sacred Books of the East, vol. 11. Translated by T. W. R. Davids, and edited by Friedrich M. Muller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. 2008. Whispers to Voices: Gender and Social Transformation in Bangladesh, Bangladesh Development Series Paper no. 22. www.worldbank.org.bd/bds.

  • Wadud, Amina. 1999. Qur’an and Women: Reading the Sacred Text From a Woman’s Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadud, Amina. 2006. Inside the Gender Jihad: Women’s Reform in Islam. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, Wiebke. 1981. Women in Islam. Translated by C. S. V Salt. Montclair: A. Schram.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, Montgomery W. 2009. The Formative Period of Islamic Thought, reprint. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaid, Nasr A. 2006. “The Nexus of Theory and Practice.” In The New Voices of Islam: Rethinking Politics and Modernity, edited by Mehran Kamrava, 153–76. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alam, S. (2018). Barriers to Women’s Power and Agency. In: Perceptions of Self, Power, & Gender Among Muslim Women. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73791-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics