• David Roas


The transgression proposed by the fantastic is not limited exclusively to its narrative and thematic concerns, but is also manifested on a linguistic level (in literature, of course): the fantastic phenomenon, which is impossible to explain, exceeds the frontiers of language, it is by definition indescribable because it is unthinkable. It may, therefore, be worth asking if there is a language with a particular form of discourse that is natural to the fantastic. The critics who have led the way in asking this question have all arrived at the same conclusion: whilst it is possible to detect various recurring rhetorical, discursive and structural devices in a significant number of narratives of the fantastic, they are not exclusive to the fantastic and are shared across literary language in general. There is no language of the fantastic in itself, but rather a way of using language that generates a fantastic effect, but without forgetting that the fantastic narrative is extremely dependent on an extratextual notion that defines it as an expression of a confirmed reality.


Realism Limits of language Linguistic resources 


Literary Works and Films

  1. Critical WorksGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2003a. El Aleph. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  3. Cortázar, Julio. 1995a. Axolotl. In Final de juego, 141–146. Madrid: Anaya & Mario Muchnik.Google Scholar
  4. Fernández Cubas, Cristina. 1983. La noche de Jezabel. In Los altillos de Brumal, 89–126. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
  5. Lovecraft, H.P. 2005. Tales. New York: The Library of America.Google Scholar
  6. Maupassant, Guy de. 2006. Who Knows? In Works. University of Adelaide Library.
  7. Poe, Edgar Allan. 1984. Poetry and Tales. New York: The Library of America.Google Scholar
  8. Wiene, Robert. 1919. Das Kabinett des Doktor Caligari. Decla.Google Scholar
  9. Barthes, Roland. 1968. L’Effet de Réel. Communications 11: 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belevan, Harry. 1976. Teoría de lo fantástico. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
  11. Bellemin-Noël, Jean. 1971. Des formes fantastiques aux thèmes fantasmatiques. Littérature 2: 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2001. Notas sobre lo fantástico (textos de Théophile Gautier). In Teorías de lo fantástico, ed. David Roas, 107–140. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1998. Territoires des fantastiques. Des roman gothiques aux récits d’horreur modern. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2001. ¿Un discurso de lo fantástico? In Teorías de lo fantástico, ed. David Roas, 223–242. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
  15. Campra, Rosalba. 1985. Fantástico y sintaxis narrativa. Río de la Plata 1: 95–111.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2001. Lo fantástico: una isotopía de la transgresión. In Teorías de lo fantástico, ed. David Roas, 153–191. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
  17. Ceserani, Remo. 1996. Il fantastico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  18. Erdal Jordan, Mary. 1998. La narrativa fantástica. Evolución del género y su relación con las concepciones del lenguaje. Madrid: Vervuert Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
  19. Herrero Cecilia, Juan. 2000. Estética y pragmática del relato fantástico (las estrategias narrativas y la cooperación interpretativa del lector). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, Rosemary. 1981. Fantasy, the Literature of Subversion. New York: New Accents.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mellier, Denis. 2000. La littérature fantastique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  22. Risco, Antonio. 1982. Literatura y fantasía. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
  23. Rodríguez Hernández, Tahiche. 2008. La conspiración fantástica: una perspectiva lingüístico-cognitiva sobre la evolución del género fantástico. Research Submitted Within the “MA on Comparative Literature: Literary and Cultural Studies”, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2010. La conspiración fantástica: una aproximación lingüístico-cognitiva a la evolución del género. Espéculo. Revista de Estudios Literarios 43.
  25. Segre, Cesare. 1985. Principios de análisis del texto literario. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
  26. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1970. Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  27. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London/New York: Routledge. 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Roas
    • 1
  1. 1.Literary Theory and Comparative LiteratureUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations