Skip to main content

Income Diversification and Banks’ Profitability from an African Market Perspective: A Relief for SMEs?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa ((PSEA))

Abstract

The financial sectors in many African countries have witnessed some regulatory changes and financial reforms in the early 1990s. These reforms have shifted the focus to the generation of non-traditional income. Notwithstanding, the empirical evidence on the impact of income diversification on banks’ profitability in Africa banking markets appears inadequate. The study employs a panel data of 584 banks and well-functioning internationally active banks with various specializations headquartered in 50 African countries spanning from 2001 to 2013. Empirical results document a negative relationship between income diversification and banks’ profitability. This implies that diversified banks in Africa are less profitable. Further, although the study invalidates a non-linear relationship between income diversification and banks’ profitability, the findings indicate that income diversification has a diminishing marginal impact on banks’ profitability. Thus, the nexus between income diversification and bank diversification is linear in African banking environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Williams, Mark (April 12, 2010). Uncontrolled Risk. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-163829-6.

  2. 2.

    OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2005 Edition.

References

  • Aboagye, A. Q. Q. (2012). Bank concentration and economic costs of deposit mobilization and credit extension in Ghana. Journal of Development Areas, 46(2), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V., Hasan, I., & Saunders, A. (2002). Should banks be diversified? Evidence from individual bank loan portfolios. Working Paper No. 118, Bank for International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V. V., Hasan, I., & Saunders, A. (2006). Should banks be diversified? Evidence from individual bank loan portfolios. Journal of Business, 79(1), 1355–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adu, F. (2015). Ghanaian banks fall on government securities to forestall impact of challenging economy. Retrieved August 12, 2012, from http://newsghana.com.gh/ghanaian-banks-fall-on-government-securities-to-forestall-impact-of-challenging-economy.

  • Alhassan, A. L. (2014). Income diversification and bank efficiency in an emerging market. Managerial Finance, 41(12), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2014-0304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkassim, F. A. (2005). The profitability of Islamic and conventional banking in the GCC countries: A comparative study. Master degree project, University of Wales Bangor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alrashdan, A. (2002). Profitability determinants of Jordanian commercial banks. Master degree project, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell. Journal of Economics, 12(2), 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, R. J. (1969). Conglomerate growth and profitability. In L. Garoian (Ed.), Economics of conglomerate growth (pp. 72–80). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N. K. (2009). Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: An illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. Omega, 37(2), 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baele, L., De Jonghe, O., & Vennet, R. V. (2007). Does the stock market value bank diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(7), 1999–2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, A.-H. M. (2001, January 7–9). Assessing the performance of Islamic Banks: Some evidence from the Middle East 21st annual meeting of Middle East Economic Association, in conjunction with Allied Social Sciences Association in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversifications effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. W., & Winters, D. B. (2000). Local lending markets: What a small business owner/manager needs to know. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 39(2), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadi, I., Dana, L. P., Mertens, G., & Mensah, L. (2017). SMEs’ financing and banks’ profitability: A “Good Date” for Banks in Ghana? Journal of African Business, 18(2), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodnar, G. M., Tang, C., & Weintrop, J. (1997). Both sides of corporate diversification: The value impacts of geographic and industrial diversification. Working Paper, NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokpin, G. A. (2013). Ownership structure, corporate governance and bank efficiency: An empirical analysis of panel data from the banking industry in Ghana. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, P. (1989). Concentration and other determinants of bank profitability in Europe, North America and Australia. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13(1), 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, C. W. (1998). Universal banking ‘American style’. Journal of Institutional Theory Economic, 154(1), 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., & Dow Jones Newswires (2001). HSBC to target SMEs with 20 banking centres. Hong Kong iMail. Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronopoulos, D. K., Girardone, C., & Nankervis, J. C. (2011). Are there any cost and profit efficiency gains in financial conglomeration? Evidence from the accession countries. The European Journal of Finance, 17(8), 603–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeys, S., & Vander, V. R. (2008). Determinants of bank interest margins in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparison with the West. Economic Systems, 32(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comment, R., & Jarrell, G. (1995). Corporate focus and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. P. (1998). Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: Some international evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, Oxford University Journal, 13(2), 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, S., & Elyasiani, E. (2008). Geographic diversification and BHC return and risk performance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(3), 1217–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, S., Elyasiani, E., & Mao, C. X. (2007). Diversification and the cost of debt of bank holding companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(1), 2453–2473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.657351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. (1987). The role of banks in economic development. Journal of Political Economy, 49(1), 227–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., & Wang, Y. (2012). Bank holding company diversification and production efficiency. Applied Financial Economics, 22(2), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.657351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, J. (1971). Risk, returns, and the morphology of commercial banking. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6(2), 763–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, J. G., Apilado, V. P., & Kolari, J. W. (1996). Commercial bank mutual fund activities: Implications for bank risk and profitability. Journal of Bank & Finance, 20(2), 1775–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambacorta, L., & Rixtel, A. V. (2013). Structural bank regulation initiatives: Approaches and implications. Working Paper No. 412, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambacorta, L., Scatigna, M., & Yang, J. (2014). Diversification and bank profitability: A nonlinear approach. Applied Economics Letters, 21(6), 438–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.866196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Herrero, A., Gavilá, S., & Santabárbara, D. (2009). What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks? Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2), 2080–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1964). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Journal of Economics and Banking, 10(3), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, V. (2007). Firm size and diversification: Multiproduct firms in asymmetric oligo-poly. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(2), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haron, S. (2004). Determinants of Islamic bank profitability. The Global Journal of Finance and Economics, 1(1), 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haron, S., & Azmi, W. N. W. (2004, December 5–7). Profitability determinants of Islamic banks: A co-integration approach. Islamic Banking Conference, Union Arab Bank, Beirut, Lebanon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Kriebel, C., & Raviv, A. (1992). Asymmetric information, incentives, and intrafirm resource allocation. Management Science, 28(2), 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, K., & Bashir, M. (2003, July 7–9). Determinants of Islamic banking profitability, International Seminar on Islamic Wealth Creation, University of Durham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggestad, A. A. (1977). Market structure, risk, and profitability in commercial banking. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 1207–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R. J., & Santomero, A. M. (1990). The corporate structure of financial conglomerates. Journal of Financial Service Research, 4(1), 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, D., & Zoellner, J. (1966). The Relation between bank portfolios and earnings: An econometric analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 48(1), 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iskandar-Datta, M., & McLaughlin, R. (2007). Global diversification: New evidence from corporate operating performance. Corporate Ownership and Control, 4(1), 228–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isshaq, Z., & Bokpin, G. A. (2012). Expansion and efficiency in banking: Evidence from Ghana. Managerial Decision Economic, 33(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of fee cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1996). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. H., Lenn, D. G., & O’Neill, H. M. (1997). Many paths across nations: How business level strategies influence the extent of internationalization of MNCs in the US construction equipment industry. Journal of Global Business, 8(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. L. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, W. R., & Matsunaga, L. (1985). Profits of commercial banks in tenth district states, Economic Review of Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, June, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P., & Saidenberg, M. (1998). Diversification, organization, and efficiency: Evidence from bank holding companies. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmidou, K. (2008). The determinants of Banks’ Profits in Greece during the period of EU financial integration, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Managerial

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwast, M. L., & Rose, J. T. (1982). Pricing, operating efficiency, and profitability among large commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 6(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 331–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, O. (1997). Cash flow and investment: Evidence from internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L., & Stulz, R. (1994). Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 1248–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C., Hsieh, M.-F., & Yang, S. J. (2014). The relationship between revenue diversification and bank performance: Do financial structures and financial reforms matter? Japan and the World Economy, 29(2), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: View and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1999). Foreign bank entry and capital control liberalization: Effects on growth and stability. Mimeo: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. Journal of Finance, 26(1), 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham, J. W. (1973). Conglomerate enterprise and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercieca, S., Schaeck, K., & Wolfe, S. (2007). Small European banks: Benefits from diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(7), 1975–1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meslier, C., Tacneng, R., & Tarazi, A. (2014). Is bank income diversification beneficial ? Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 31(2), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1(2), 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., & Noulas, A. G. (1997). Portfolio mix and large-bank profitability in the USA. Applied Economics, 29(4), 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlambo, K., & Ncube, M. (2011). Competition and efficiency in the banking sector in South Africa. African Development Review, 23(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P., & Thornton, J. (1992). Determinants of European bank profitability: A note. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(6), 1173–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. P., & Katherine S. (2003, February 20). Geographic diversification in banking and its implication for bank portfolio choice and performance. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullineaux, D. J. (1978). Economies of scale and organizational efficiency in banking: A profit-function approach. Journal of Finance, 33, 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naceur, S. (2003). The determinants of the Tunisian banking industry profitability: Panel evidence. Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 5(1), 106–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyantakyi, E. B., Sy, M., & Kayizzi-mugerwa, S. (2015). The banking system in Africa: Main facts and challenges. Africa Economic Brief, 6(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owired, P. (2015). Ghanaian banks fall on government securities to forestall impact of challenging economy. Retrieved August 12, 2012, from http://newsghana.com.gh/ghanaian-banks-fall-on-government-securities-to-forestall-impact-of-challenging-economy.

  • Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. S. (1998). The evolution of bank lending to small business. New England Economic Review, 3(1), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennathur, A. K., Subrahmanyam, V., & Vishwasrao, S. (2012). Income diversification and risk: Does ownership matter? An empirical examination of Indian banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(2), 2203–2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G. (2002). Multinationality, product diversification, and profitability of emerging US small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 35–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, J. (1979). Inflation and financial institutions. London: Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, M. H., & Williamson, O. E. (1985). Asset specificity and economic organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3(4), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka, A. N. A., Aboagye, A. Q. Q., & Gemegah, A. (2012). Technical efficiency of the Ghanaian banking industry and the effects of the entry of foreign banks. Journal of African Business, 13(3), 232–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies benefit from revenue diversification? Journal of Financial Services Research, 40(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D. (1998). The dark side of internal capital markets II: Evidence from diversified conglomerates. Working Paper, NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. C. (2000). Herd behavior and investment: Reply. American Economic Review, 90(1), 705–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkey, J. F. (1992). Commercial bank management (4th ed.). London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staikouras, C., & Wood, G. (2003). The determinants of bank profitability in Europe. Paper presented at the European Applied Business Research Conference, Venice, 9–13 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (1997). Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(1), 853–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2005). A portfolio view of banking with interest and noninterest assets. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J., & Rumble, A. (2006). The dark side of diversification: The case of US financial holding companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(1), 2131–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of enterprise. Journal of Economic Behaviour Organisation, 1(1), 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, A. (1987). Discussion. Journal of Finance, 42(3), 661–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2002). Firm diversification and asymmetric information: Evidence from analysts? Forecasts and earnings announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(10), 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, T. A., & Cassel, H. S. (1975). Factors influencing the extension of bank credit to small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 13(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennet, R. V. (2002). Cost and profit efficiency of financial conglomerates and universal banks in Europe. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34(2), 254–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viñals, J., Pazarbasioglu, C., & Surti, J. (2013, May). Creating a safer financial system: Will the Volcker, Vickers, and Liikanen structural measures help? IMF Staff Discussion Paper No. 4, IMF, Washington, DC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winton, A. (1999). Don’t put all your eggs in one basket? Diversification and specialization in lending. Working Paper, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013, September). Creating more and better jobs. Philippine Development Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigit, I., & Berham, N. K. (2013). The relationship between diversification strategy and organizational performance in developed and emerging economy contexts: Evidence from Turkey and Netherlands. Eurasian Business Review, 3, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Deborah, D. (2005). Banking at the base of the pyramid: A microfinance primer for commercial banks. Bethesda, MA: Development Alternatives, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for the Explanatory Variables

Variable

VIF

1/VIF

DIV_Ratio

1.36

0.73705

Prtxpr

2.33

0.42919

Impairm

1.73

0.57804

GrL

1.43

0.69723

Coin

1.22

0.82151

Eq_TAs

1.14

0.87783

Lo_TAs

1.09

0.9202

INF

1.06

0.94586

Spec_t

1.05

0.95459

EX

1.03

0.97015

RINT

1.02

0.97611

Mean VIF

1.31

 
  1. Note: The mean VIF was 1.31, which is much lower than the threshold of 10. The VIF for individual variables was also below 10. This indicates that the explanatory variables included in the model were not substantially correlated with each other, indicating an absence of multicollinearity between the variables

Appendix 2: Fisher Unit Root Test of Variables Based on Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test (ADF)

Variables

Inverse chi sq.

Inverse normal

Inverse logit

Modified inv. chi sq.

Statistic

Prob

Statistic

Prob

Statistic

Prob

Statistic

Prob

ROA

3357.9526

0.0000

−32.7407

0.0000

−45.0581

0.0000

65.1358

0.0000

DIV_Ratio

4419.1853

0.0000

−38.9748

0.0000

−57.6823

0.0000

87.7836

0.0000

Prtxpr

2519.3053

0.0000

−24.8063

0.0000

−31.9186

0.0000

43.5054

0.0000

Impairm

2923.6621

0.0000

−28.8038

0.0000

−37.1205

0.0000

51.9462

0.0000

GrL

2816.4375

0.0000

−25.6317

0.0000

−34.0667

0.0000

48.6475

0.0000

Coin

3849.0864

0.0000

−38.389

0.0000

−50.6791

0.0000

73.8247

0.0000

Eq_TAs

3568.5977

0.0000

−36.736

0.0000

−46.6997

0.0000

67.2162

0.0000

Lo_TAs

4484.1608

0.0000

−42.9688

0.0000

−59.4364

0.0000

89.3746

0.0000

INF

3984.4261

0.0000

−37.8152

0.0000

−52.1047

0.0000

77.1385

0.0000

Spec_t

2870.6609

0.0000

−35.7258

0.0000

−45.7547

0.0000

49.8679

0.0000

EX

4487.5738

0.0000

−33.0863

0.0000

−55.6801

0.0000

89.4581

0.0000

RINT

3931.6951

0.0000

−35.6641

0.0000

−49.2331

0.0000

75.8474

0.0000

  1. Source: Author’s estimate (2017) using STATA 14
  2. Ho All panels contain unit roots, Ha At least one panel is stationary

Appendix 3: Hausman Specification Tests Between FE and RE Estimates

Variables

(b) fixed

(B) random

(b−B) difference

sqrt(diag(V_b−V_B)) S.E.

DIV_Ratio

−0.7874

−0.7680

−0.0194

0.0264

Prtxpr

0.4421

0.4381

0.0040

0.0045

Impairm

−0.2312

−0.2293

−0.0019

0.0035

GrL

−0.0228

−0.023

0.0159

0.0954

Coin

−0.2482

−0.2316

−0.0166

0.0140

Eq_TAs

0.5122

0.4986

0.0136

0.0108

Lo_TAs

0.0289

0.0225

0.0065

0.0085

INF

0.1310

0.1412

−0.0102

0.0064

Spec_t

−0.0286

−0.0269

−0.0017

0.0061

EX

−0.3100

−0.3072

−0.0028

0.0193

RINT

0.0067

0.0078

−0.0010

0.0005

  1. Source: Author’s estimate (2017) using STATA 14
  2. Note: Thus, the Hausman specification test is carried out to inform whether RE estimation gives more consistent results, given the data used for this study. When Prob > Χ2 = α, the null hypothesis is rejected. This reinforces the consistency of the RE in estimating the chosen model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boadi, I. (2018). Income Diversification and Banks’ Profitability from an African Market Perspective: A Relief for SMEs?. In: Dana, LP., Ratten, V., Honyenuga, B. (eds) African Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73700-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics