Transforming Health Education to Catalyze a Global Paradigm Shift: Systems Thinking, Complexity, and Design Thinking
At the dawn of the twentieth century, the Flexner report catalyzed a transition in medical thought toward science-based research and practice. That paradigm shift resulted in a substantial improvement in human health. However, the advances that accompanied a biomedical reductionist paradigm—an approach to health concentrated on physiological minutia, professions working in silos, and a focus on episodic treatment—which surged exponentially after Flexner’s report are not adequate for the complexity of today’s health challenges. In this chapter, we make the case that we need a change in mindset similar to what resulted from Flexner’s report: a historical paradigm shift from biological reductionism toward a complex social systems approach to health improvement. We introduce three overlapping and emerging perspectives that provide the theory, language, tools, and methods suitable for today’s challenges: systems thinking, complexity thinking, and adaptive design. We also argue that some combination of these perspectives and approaches will provide the paradigm for the next century.
We gratefully acknowledge the work of Eliza Swanson in preparing the figures for this manuscript.
- 1.Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. New York: Carnegie Foundation; 1910.Google Scholar
- 2.Hiatt MD, Stockton CG. The impact of the Flexner Report on the fate of medical schools in North America after 1909. J Am Phys Surg. 2003;8(2):37–40.Google Scholar
- 3.http://www.abms.org/member-boards/specialty-subspecialty-certificates/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 4.http://www.acr.org/Advocacy/Economics-Health-Policy/Billing-Coding/Prepare-Now-for-ICD10. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 5.https://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 6.Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary; 2004.Google Scholar
- 7.Williams B, Hummelbrunner R. Systems concepts in action: a practitioner’s toolkit. Standford: Stanford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 8.Plsek P. Appendix B: redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems. In: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America - Institute of Medicine, editor. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001. p. 309–22.Google Scholar
- 10.Caffrey L, Wolfe C, McKevitt C. Embedding research in health systems: lessons from complexity theory. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):54.Google Scholar
- 11.Buchanan R. Wicked problems in design thinking. Kepes 2010;7(6):7–35.Google Scholar
- 12.Bernstein M, Linsky M. Leading change through adaptive design. Stanford social innovation review. Winter 2016. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/leading_change_through_adaptive_design.
- 13.www.revolutionizehealth.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 14.Nichols B. Malnutrition in children in resource-limited countries: clinical assessment. UpToDate®. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/malnutrition-in-children-in-resource-limited-countries-clinical-assessment.
- 16.Vollmer S, Bommer C, Krishna A, Harttgen K, Subramanian SV. The association of parental education with childhood undernutrition in low-and middle-income countries: comparing the role of paternal and maternal education. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;46(1):312–23.Google Scholar
- 17.Reynolds M, Sarriot E, Swanson R, Rusoja E. Evolution and application of systems ideas: toward principles for systems thinking in health practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018. doi: 10.1111/jep.12856.
- 20.http://beyondflexner.org/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 21.http://www.thenextsystem.org/next-health-system/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 23.https://president.asu.edu/about/michaelcrow. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 24.https://chs.asu.edu/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 25.https://chs.asu.edu/programs/schools/school-science-health-care-delive. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
- 26.Crow MM, Dabars WB. Designing the new American university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- 27.Perry H, Robison N, Chavez D, Taja O, Carolina H, Shanklin D, Wyon J. Attaining health for all through community partnerships: principles of the census-based, impact-oriented (CBIO) approach to primary health care developed in Bolivia, South America. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(8):1053–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.http://jamkhed.org/about/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.