Skip to main content

Shared Task on Detecting Paraphrases in Indian Languages (DPIL): An Overview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text Processing (FIRE 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explains the overview of the shared task on “Detecting Paraphrases in Indian Languages” (DPIL) conducted at FIRE 2016. Given a pair of sentences in the same language, participants were asked to detect the semantic equivalence between sentences. This shared task was proposed for four Indian languages, namely Tamil, Malayalam, Hindi, and Punjabi. There were two subtasks given under the shared task on Detecting Paraphrase in Indian Languages. Given a pair of sentences, the subtask-1 was to classify them as paraphrases or not paraphrases. The subtask-2 was to identify whether they are paraphrases or semi-paraphrases or not paraphrases. The dataset created for the shared task has been made available online, and it is the first open-source paraphrase detection corpora for Indian languages. In this overview paper, we describe both subtasks, datasets, evaluation methods and system descriptions as well as performances of the submitted runs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://nlp.amrita.edu/dpil_cen/

  2. 2.

    http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2015/

  3. 3.

    http://nlp.amrita.edu/dpil_cen/

  4. 4.

    It does not affect the result of the participating teams

References

  1. Dolan, W.B., Brockett, C.: Automatically constructing a corpus of sentential paraphrases. In: Proceedings of IWP, October 2005

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, W., Callison-Burch, C., Dolan, W.B.: SemEval-2015 task 1: paraphrase and semantic similarity in Twitter (PIT). In: Proceedings of SemEval (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, W., Ritter, A., Callison-Burch, C., Dolan, W.B., Ji, Y.: Extracting lexically divergent paraphrases from Twitter. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2, 435–448 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pronoza, E., Yagunova, E., Pronoza, A.: Construction of a Russian paraphrase corpus: unsupervised paraphrase extraction. In: Braslavski, P., Markov, I., Pardalos, P., Volkovich, Y., Ignatov, Dmitry I., Koltsov, S., Koltsova, O. (eds.) RuSSIR 2015. CCIS, vol. 573, pp. 146–157. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41718-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Potthast, M., Stein, B., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P.: An evaluation framework for plagiarism detection. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 997–1005. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rus, V., Banjade, R., Lintean, M.C.: On paraphrase identification corpora. In: LREC, pp. 2422–2429 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kothwal, R., Varma, V.: Cross lingual text reuse detection based on keyphrase extraction and similarity measures. In: Majumder, P., Mitra, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Subramaniam, L.V., Contractor, D., Rosso, P. (eds.) FIRE 2010-2011. LNCS, vol. 7536, pp. 71–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40087-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahalakshmi, S., Anand Kumar, M., Soman, K.P.: Paraphrase detection for Tamil language using deep learning algorithm. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10(17), 13929–13934 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Idicula, S.M.: Fingerprinting based detection system for identifying plagiarism in Malayalam text documents. In: 2015 International Conference on Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet), pp. 553–558. IEEE, December 2015

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathew, D., Idicula, S.M.: Paraphrase identification of Malayalam sentences-an experience. In: 2013 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC), pp. 376–382. IEEE, December 2013

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahane, S.: The meaning-text theory. Dependency Valency Int. Handb. Contemp. Res. 1, 546–570 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

First, we would like to thank FIRE 2016 organizers for giving us an opportunity to organize the shared task on Detecting Paraphrases for Indian Languages (DPIL). We would like to extend our gratitude to the advisory committee members Prof. Ramanan, RelAgent Pvt. Ltd and Prof. Rajendran S, Computational Engineering and Networking (CEN) for actively supporting us throughout the track. We would like to thank our PG students at CEN for helping us in creating the paraphrase corpora.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Anand Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anand Kumar, M., Singh, S., Kavirajan, B., Soman, K.P. (2018). Shared Task on Detecting Paraphrases in Indian Languages (DPIL): An Overview. In: Majumder, P., Mitra, M., Mehta, P., Sankhavara, J. (eds) Text Processing. FIRE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73606-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73606-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73605-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73606-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics