Skip to main content

Bifurcation and Catastrophe in Metal Cutting Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metal Cutting Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

  • 1143 Accesses

Abstract

By means of theoretical analysis it is predicted that there must be Bifurcation and Catastrophe phenomena existing in cutting process, and we did find the phenomena in our cutting experiments. The root of the phenomena is the strong non-linearity of non-free cutting process. This finding is beyond people’s traditional knowledge and understanding of metal cutting process, but has been fully verified by experimental facts. The research has revealed the complexity of a cutting process and the difficulty to control it, deepened people’s understanding of the technological process of metal cutting, and required people to renew conception and strategy of machining process design and chip-control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Deduction of this Formulae see the Appendix (9.1) of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanmin Shi .

Appendix 9.1

Appendix 9.1

Deduction of Eq. (9.1).

A non-free cutting model with double edged cutting tool was presented in this chapter, as shown in Fig. 9.1, and its mathematical presentation is Eq. (9.1). Here, we will give a brief deduction of Eq. (9.1).

The unit vector in the direction of resultant force on rake face is

$${\mathbf{R}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} = - \sin \beta \,\sin \psi_{\lambda } \, {\mathbf{i}} - \sin \beta \,\cos \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{j}} + \cos \beta \, {\mathbf{k}}\text{,}$$
(9.6)

where, β is the friction angle on the interface between the rake and the chips, and i, j, k are the unit vectors in the directions of axes x, y, z, respectively (they are not shown in Fig. 9.1). The resultant force imposed on chip by the rake is;

$$\varvec{R} = R{\mathbf{R}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} ,$$
(9.7)

The vector of cutting velocity is,

$$\varvec{ V} = V{\mathbf{k}}\text{,}$$
(9.8)

The vector of chip-ejection velocity is,

$$\varvec{U} = r\varvec{V}(\sin \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{i}} + \cos \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{j}}),$$
(9.9)

where, r is cutting ratio. The vector of shear velocity is,

$$\varvec{W} = \varvec{U} + \varvec{V} = V(r\,\sin \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{i}} + r\,\cos \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{j}} + {\mathbf{k}}).$$
(9.10)

Shear speed, i.e., the module of vector W is,

$$\left| \varvec{W} \right| = V\sqrt {1 + r^{2} }$$
(9.11)

The unit vector in the shear direction is,

$${\mathbf{W}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} = \frac{{r\,\sin \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{i}} + r\,\cos \psi_{\lambda } {\mathbf{j}} + {\mathbf{k}}}}{{\sqrt {1 + r^{2} } }}$$
(9.12)

The shear force, i.e., the projection of R on the shear direction W 1 ,

$$\varvec{R} \cdot {\mathbf{W}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} = R({\mathbf{R}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} \cdot {\mathbf{W}}_{{\mathbf{1}}} ) = R\frac{(\cos \beta - r\,\sin \beta )}{{\sqrt {1 + r^{2} } }} = \tau S,$$
(9.13)

where, τ is shear stress of the work-piece material, and S is the area of shear plane. So,

$$R = \frac{{\tau S\sqrt {1 + r^{2} } }}{(\cos \beta - r\,\sin \beta )}.$$
(9.14)

The cutting power is,

$$A = R \cdot \,\cos \beta \cdot V = \frac{V \cdot \tau \cdot \,\cos \beta }{(\cos \beta - r\,\sin \beta )}\sqrt {1 + r^{2} } \cdot S.$$
(9.15)

Shear plane is divided into two parts: the shear plane of major edge and the shear plane of minor edge, the areas of them are denoted as S I and S II , respectively. The calculation of S I and S II are divided into three cases:

The first case: tan ψ λ < a w/ a c , in this case, vector W intersects with the top surface AFCE of the work-piece, and the intersection point is P. What is shown in Fig. 9.1 is just this case. The coordinates of point P In the coordinate system xyz are \(P_{x} = a_{c} \tan \psi_{\lambda } \,\), \(P_{y} = \, a_{\text{c}} \,\) and \(P_{z} = \, {{a_{\text{c}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{a_{\text{c}} } {(r\,{ \cos }\,\psi_{\lambda } )}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {(r\,{ \cos }\,\psi_{\lambda } )}}\). In this case, S I and S II are shown as Fig. 9.14a, b and the total area of the two shear plane

Fig. 9.14
figure 14

The shear planes (tan ψ λ  < a w /a c ). a Major shear plane. b Minor shear plane

$$\begin{aligned} S & = S_{\text{I}} + S_{\text{II}} = \, \square BCEO - \Delta OPE + \Delta OAP \\ & = a_{c} (a_{w} - \frac{1}{2}a_{c} \tan \psi_{\lambda } )\sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{{r^{2} \cos^{2} \psi_{\lambda } }}} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{{a_{c}^{2} }}{{r\,\cos \psi_{\lambda } }}\sqrt {1 + r^{2} \sin^{2} \psi_{\lambda } } . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(9.16)

The second case: tan ψ λ > a w/ a c , in this case, vector W intersects with the side surface FCDB of the work-piece, and the intersection point is P. The coordinates of point P In the coordinate system xyz are \(P_{x} = a_{w}\), \(P_{y} = \, {{a_{w} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{a_{w} } {{ \tan }\psi_{\lambda } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {{ \tan }\psi_{\lambda } }} \,\) and \(P_{z} \, = {{a_{w} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{a_{w} } {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }})\). In this case, S I and S II are shown as Fig. 9.15b and c, and the total area of the two shear plane is,

Fig. 9.15
figure 15

The area of cut and shear planes (tan ψ λ  > a w /a c ). a Chip sections. b Major shear plane. c Minor shear plane

$$\begin{aligned} S & = S_{\text{I}} + S_{\text{II}} = \Delta OBP +\square ACDO - \Delta OPD \\ & = \frac{{a_{w} }}{{r\,\sin \psi_{\lambda } }}\left[ {a_{c} \sqrt {1 + r^{2} \sin^{2} \psi_{\lambda } } + \frac{1}{2}a_{w} \left( {\sqrt {1 + r^{2} \cos^{2} \psi_{\lambda } } - \sqrt {\cot^{2} \psi_{\lambda } + r^{2} \cos^{2} \psi_{\lambda } } } \right)} \right]. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(9.17)

The third case, tan ψ λ  = a w/ a c , it is a critical case between the above two cases, the vector W intersects with the side ridge EC of the work-piece, and the intersection point is P, which coincides with the corner point C as shown in Fig. 9.16a. The coordinates of point P in the coordinate system xyz are \(P_{x} = a_{w}\), \(P_{y} = \, a_{c} \,\) and \(P_{z} \, = {{a_{w} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{a_{w} } {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }}) = {{a_{c} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{a_{c} } {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\text{(}r\,{ \sin }\psi_{\lambda } }})\). In this case, S I and S II are shown as Fig. 9.15b, c, and the total area of the two shear plane is,

Fig. 9.16
figure 16

The area of cut and shear planes (tan ψ λ  = a w /a c ). a Chip sections. b Major shear plane. c Minor shear plane

$$S = S_{\text{I}} + S_{\text{II}} = \Delta BPO + \Delta PAO = \frac{1}{2r}\left[ {a_{c} \sqrt {a_{w}^{2} (1 + r^{2} ) + a_{c}^{2} } + a_{w} \sqrt {a_{c}^{2} (1 + r^{2} ) + a_{w}^{2} } } \right],$$
(9.18)

Substituting Eqs. (9.6)–(9.8) into Eq. (9.5), respectively, and considering the physical unit conversion result in the Eq. (9.1), i.e., the expression of cutting power .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shi, H. (2018). Bifurcation and Catastrophe in Metal Cutting Process. In: Metal Cutting Theory. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73561-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73561-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73560-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73561-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics