Abstract
A driving force in the creation of new firms resides in the developments of novel technology by members of current companies. When this happens, an employee gains the incentive to quit the parent company and start a new business venture (i.e. spin-out). Research on entrepreneurial employees and their spin-outs is fragmented and misleading. This chapter finds theoretical gaps and enlarges the understanding of the conditions that allow technological knowledge to give rise to entrepreneurial employees. The analysis of 23 entrepreneurs and 10 spin-out companies in the internet and bio-tech industries shows the pattern of creation of new technological enterprises. It recognizes the role of employees’ entrepreneurship in the formation of innovative ventures. Eventually, the new technology moves again when an existing company acquires the spin-out along with the entrepreneur. This research solves conflicting views in the literature and gives insights into how entrepreneurs actively transfer technologies from one company to another. Entrepreneurial employees create new ventures in a different industry, combine multiple experiences in mature businesses, and pursue acquisition. These conclusions push scholars and practitioners to look at employees’ accumulation of knowledge and business experience as a source of innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. B. (2002). Knowledge transfer through congenital learning: Spin-out generation, growth and survival. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. B. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 501–522.
Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. (1995). Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 362–378.
Balkman, J., & Gilson, R. J. (1999). Why start-ups? Stanford Law Review, 51(2), 289–308.
Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 255–273.
Brittain, J. W., & Freeman, J. (1986). Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. Unpublished Manuscript.
Cabral, L. (2003). R&D competition when firms choose variance. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 139–150.
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.
Christensen, C.M. (1993). The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Business History Review, Winter, 531–588.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.
Cooper, A. C. (1985). The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 75–86.
Cooper, A. C., & Bruno, A. V. (1977). Success among high-technology firms. Business Horizons, April, 16–22.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper & Row.
Dyck, B. (1997). Exploring organizational family trees. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6, 222–233.
Feldman, M. P. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 5–25.
Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Staff Report, 272.
Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2005). Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis working paper.
Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2000). Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 485–511.
Garvin, D. A. (1983). Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. California Management Review, January, 3–20.
Henderson, R. A., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing systems and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.
Henkel, J., Rønde, T., & Wagner, M. (2010). And the winner is – acquired: Entrepreneurship as a contest with acquisition as the prize. CEPR discussion paper, n. 8147.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.
Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.
Klepper, S. (2001). Employee startups in high-tech industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 639–674.
Klepper, S., & Sleeper, S. D. (2005). Entry by spinoffs. Management Science, 51, 1291–1306.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit dimension. London: Routledge.
Roberts, E. B. (1991). The technological base of the new enterprise. Research Policy, 20(4), 283–298.
Rohrbeck, R., Döhler, M., & Arnold, H. M. (2009). Creating growth with externalization of R&D results – the spin-along approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 28, 44–51.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard.
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.
Wiggins, S. N. (1995). Entrepreneurial enterprises, endogenous ownership, and the limits to firm size. Economic Inquiry, 33, 54–69.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case-study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landoni, M., ogilvie, d. (2018). How Technology Travels from Old to New Firms: The Role of Employees’ Entrepreneurship in Technology Ventures. In: Presse, A., Terzidis, O. (eds) Technology Entrepreneurship. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73509-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73509-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73508-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73509-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)