Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable System Value Creation: Development of Preliminary Frameworks for a Business Model Change Within a Systemic Transition Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Models

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Although corporate sustainability has gained more attention and companies have recently showed a growing interest in sustainable practices, the progress towards sustainable development has been slow leading to increasing environmental and social challenges. Business model innovations are recognized as a key to the creation of sustainable business and as a bridge between company level and system level changes. Sustainable business model innovations create, deliver and capture economic, social, and ecological value for customers and other stakeholders in various societies. The aim of this chapter is to deepen the understanding of the ways how companies create and capture sustainable value through business models in a larger operation system. From the theoretical perspective, the chapter adopts the transition theory and the concept of strong sustainabilit y for understanding socio-technical transitions and business model changes towards sustainability. Here the focus is on companies’ dualistic role pursuing sustainable development targets—both contributing to sustainability within the business dimensions, and assisting the broader systemic change through the new sustainable business models. Furthermore, the chapter deals with the external factors that either enable or hinder companies to transform their existing business models towards sustainability. By reviewing previous literature, this study develops preliminary frameworks combining the approaches of transition management, sustainable value creation and corporate sustainability levels. The work aims to decrease the existing gap between the literature of system transition and business models. The frameworks can be applied in the future in analyzing new sustainable business models, value processes , value creation and capture, and broader systemic changes towards sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K. (2016). Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Narus, J., & Van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, S. (2014). Actor rationales in sustainability transitions: Interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, S., Van Lente, H., & Engels, R. (2012). Competition in a technological niche: The cars of the future. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 24(5), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Sterling, A. (2005). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48–75). Camberley: Edward Elgar publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Rana, P., & Short, S. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork, S., Schoormansb, J., Silvester, S., & Joored, P. (2015). How actors can influence the legitimation of new consumer product categories: A theoretical framework. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions, 16, 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, S., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49(8), 1327–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurey, A., Krithika, P., Palit, D., Rakesh, S., & Sovacool, B. (2012). New partnerships and business models for facilitating energy access. Energy Policy, 47(suppl.1), 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Ouden, E. (2012). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2015). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M., Pitsouni, E., Malietzis, G., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable value added: Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, S., Peters, M., & Woodman, B. (2016). Local authorities as niche actors: The case of energy governance in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, C., & Gilomen, B. (2016). Business models for sustainability. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 43, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F., & Verhees, B. (2011). Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945-1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 910–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genus, A., & Coles, A.-M. (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37, 1436–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorissen, L., Vrancken, K., & Manshoven, S. (2016). Transition thinking and business model innovation: Towards a transformative business model and new role for the reuse centers of Limburg, Belgium. Sustainability, 8(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2011). On patterns and agency in transition dynamics: Some key insights from the KSI programme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., & Barkemeyer, R. (2007). Sustainable value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 7(5), 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haxeltine, A., & Seyfang, G. (2009). Transitions for the people: Theory and practice of ‘Transition’ and ‘Resilience’ in UK’s Transition Movement (Working paper 134). Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich. Accessed from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/twp134.pdf.

  • Heijden, A., Van der Cramer, J., & Driessen, P. (2012). Change agent sensemaking for sustainability in a multinational subsidiary. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4), 535–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, M., Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M., & Wikström, K. (2015). Collaboration mechanisms for business models in distributed energy ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 226–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Suskewicz, J. (2009). How to jump-start the clean-tech economy. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansem, T., & Wessberg, N. (2015). The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T., & Kuosmanen, N. (2009). How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might). Ecological Economics, 69, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, P., Haines, A., & Hayward, R. (2012). Developing strategies and leaders to succeed in a new era of sustainability: Findings and insights from the United Nations global compact-Accenture CEO study. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, M., & Patala, S. (2014). Analysing the barriers to sustainable business model innovations: Innovation systems approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(6), 1440010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919614400106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, M. (2015). Translating sustainability: The role of the retail store. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4), 386–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy: Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkilä, M. (2006). The many faces of responsibility: Acceptability of the global pulp and paper industry in various societies. Dissertationes Forestales 25. http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes/df25.pdf.

  • Mikkilä, M., & Toppinen, A. (2008). A qualitative analysis of corporate responsibility reporting in the world’s largest pulp and paper companies. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 500–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkilä, M., Panapanaan, V., & Linnanen, L. (2015). Corporate responsibility in Finland: From local movements to global responsibility. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, & M. Fifka (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe (pp. 209–228). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkilä, M., Panapanaan, V., & Linnanen, L. (2016). The pursuit of responsible business: Corporate responsibility of Finnish companies in their global operations. In S. O. Idowu (Ed.), Key initiatives in corporate social responsibility (pp. 177–200). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in Wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E., Gwozdz, W., & Hvass, K. (2016). Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3044-7.

  • Planing, P. (2015). Business model innovation in a circular economy: Reasons for non-acceptance of circular business models. Open Journal of Business Model Innovation. Accessed from http://www.scipublish.com/journals/BMI/papers/1250.

  • Rizzi, F., Bartolozzi, I., Borghini, A., & Frey, M. (2013). Environmental management of end-of-life products: Nine factors of sustainability in collaborative networks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(8), 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F., Lambin, E., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(22), 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, S., Bocken, N., Barlow, C., & Chertow, M. (2014). From refining sugar to growing tomatoes: Industrial ecology and business model evolution. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(5), 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 9(4), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 367(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Morgan, F. W. (2006). Historical perspectives on service-dominant logic. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 29–42). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38, 2655–2663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). WCED our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Millington, A. (2004). The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2003(12), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Katariina Koistinen, Minttu Laukkanen, Mirja Mikkilä, Janne Huiskonen & Lassi Linnanen

Authors
  1. Katariina Koistinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minttu Laukkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirja Mikkilä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janne Huiskonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lassi Linnanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirja Mikkilä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Antwerp Management School, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lars Moratis

  2. NHTV Breda University of Applied Science, Breda, The Netherlands

    Frans Melissen

  3. Guildhall Faculty of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koistinen, K., Laukkanen, M., Mikkilä, M., Huiskonen, J., Linnanen, L. (2018). Sustainable System Value Creation: Development of Preliminary Frameworks for a Business Model Change Within a Systemic Transition Process. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation