Abstract
Traditional approaches to sustainability , such as philanthropy, corporate social responsibility, and product innovation are insufficient to radically transform business and society toward genuine, substantive sustainable development. New hybrid business models are emerging that employ market tactics to address sustainable development issues. B Corps are a hybrid organization exemplar, blending traditionally for-profit practices with traditionally non-profit practices to address social and/or environmental issues. This chapter provides insights into how B Corps integrate for-profit (market logic) and for-purpose (social logic) considerations into their business models, drawing on interviews with 15 Australian B Corps. The research study found that social and market logics are strongly integrated in some areas (e.g., mission, recruitment and marketing) but trying to balance these two logics has created tensions and conflict in other areas (e.g., ownership structure, performance measurement, sales and distribution, product design and development). The findings emphasize the importance of creating a common organizational identity that strikes a balance between the logics to moderate conflict and one logic dominating over another. The B Corps are attempting to do this by instantiating the market and social logics in their missions, recruitment and socialization practices (remuneration, communication and training practices).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberti, F., & Varon Garrido, M. (2017). Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(1), 3–13.
B Lab. (2014). B Corporation. Accessed from http://www.bcorporation.net/
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
Battiliana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.
Belz, F., & Binder, J. (in press). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Besharov, M., & Smith, W. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.
Birkin, F., Polesie, T., & Lewis, L. (2009). A new business model for sustainable development: An exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(5), 277–290.
Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Malden: Polity Press.
Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.
Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Wang, D., & Welch, M. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Chad, P. (2013). Implementing market orientation in charities. Marketing Theory, 13(3), 303–322.
Chen, X., & Kelly, T. (2015). B-Corps – A growing form of social enterprise tracing their progress and assessing their performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 102–114.
Dittman, D. (2016). B-Corporations: Profits and social responsibility? Accessed from https://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2016/08/26/b-corporations-profits-social-responsibility/
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. The New York Times Magazine, 33, 122–126.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134.
Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–76.
Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: HarperBusiness.
Hickman, L., Byrd, J., & Hickman, K. (2014). Explaining the location of mission-driven businesses: An examination of B-Corps. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2014(55), 13–25.
Hiller, J. (2013). The Benefit Corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301.
Hoffman, A., Badiane, K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit and non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Briddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations (pp. 131–153). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2015). Identifying, mapping, and monitoring the impact of hybrid firms. California Management Review, 57(3), 107–125.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
Koehn, D. (2016). Why the new Benefit Corporations may not prove to be truly socially beneficial. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201672641.
Lee, M. S., & Battilana, J. (2013, July). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Boston: Harvard Business School (Working Paper, No. 14-005). http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11508213
Mars, M. M., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Raging against or with the private marketplace? Logic hybridity and ecoentrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(1), 4–13.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. South Melbourne: Longman Cheshire (first published 1990).
Marquis, C., Klaber, A., & Thomason, B. (2011). B Lab: Building a new sector of the economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
McMullen, J., & Warnick, B. (2016). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization? Exploring the limits of a world of blended value. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013a). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B (pp. 3–35). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013b). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.
Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Going one’s own way: Drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154.
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.
Roome, N., & Louche, C. (2016). Journeying toward business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 11–35.
Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.
Sargsian, Z. (2012). The good guy of corporations: B Corporations and the efficiencies of an environmentally and socially conscious entity. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2025232
Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016a). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016b). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289.
Smith, W., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stubbs, W. (2017a). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312.
Stubbs, W. (2017b). Sustainable entrepreneurship and B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model’. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2010). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stubbs, W. (2018). Examining the Interplay of Social and Market Logics in Hybrid Business Models: A Case Study of Australian B Corps. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73502-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73503-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)