Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Business Practices of Turkish Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Models

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Turkey as an emerging market is a member of G20 and in accordance with the rapid economic growth, Turkey is facing with pressing energy and environmental problems including air pollution, water quality, food quality, land and forest degradation. When these problems are accompanied with the recent wave of immigrants from Syria and Iraq, Turkey needs sustainable business models more than ever. In recent years, Turkey has taken important steps about sustainability practices. Among them, BIST Sustainability Index, the first such index in Turkey, was launched in 2014. The index aims to encourage Turkish companies and investors to give careful consideration to the environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues for sustainable wealth creation. The sustainability index is an important tool to improve ESG disclosure, sustainability reporting and reputation. More importantly, the index plays a crucial role to provide access to international investors and promote more responsible investment. The purpose of this chapter is to investigate sustainable business models of the leading sustainability-driven companies that take place in the BIST Sustainability Index. In this context, we are particularly interested in exploring the relationship between the index and the sustainable business models of the companies listed in the index. A review of the BIST Sustainability Index can help us to understand how Turkish companies with different backgrounds adopt sustainable business models in such a way that enable them to capture economic value through delivering social and environmental benefits. A further discussion on sustainable business models can provide support that enables Turkish companies to focus on resource efficiency, environmental issues, tightening regulations and shifting social pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C., & Zutshi, A. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review, 14(3), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktas, R., Kayalidere, K., & Kargin, M. (2013). Corporate sustainability reporting and analysis of sustainability reports in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability: A general management framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyte, J., Brazioniene, L., & Gadeikiene, A. (2010). Expression of green marketing developing the conception of corporate social responsibility. Engineering Economics, 21(5), 550–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot, S., Coulmont, M., & Serret, V. (2012). Do investors value sustainability reports? A Canadian study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(6), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1073–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, S., Durrani, A., Pasha, A., & Javed, F. (2015). Green human resource practices: Implementations and hurdles of SMEs in Pakistan. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, G. (2004). The corporate conscience and the triple bottom line. Accounting Today, July (12), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A. (2011). Do stock investors value corporate sustainability? Evidence from an event study. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1993). The perils of free trade. Scientific American, 269, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaSilva, C., & Trkman, P. (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47, 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stony Creek: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erol, I., Cakar, N., Erel, D., & Sari, R. (2009). Sustainability in the Turkish retailing industry. Sustainable Development, 17(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D. (1992). The ecological crisis of Latin America: A theoretical introduction. Latin American Perspectives, 19(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Gilbert, D., Jr. (1992). Business, ethics and society: A critical agenda. Business & Society, 31(1), 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI. (2006). Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sustainability reporting guidelines: Version 3.0 GRI. Accessed https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf

  • GRI. (2011). Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), About GRI. Accessed https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx

  • Griffiths, A., & Petrick, J. (2001). Corporate architectures for sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1573–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting. In J. Godemann & G. Michelsen (Eds.), Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 151–169). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Høgevold, N. (2011). A corporate effort towards a sustainable business model: A case study from the Norwegian furniture industry. European Business Review, 23(4), 392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45, 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., & Volpi, M. (2008). The diffusion of clean technologies: A review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, I. (2001). Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço, I., Callen, J., Branco, M., & Curto, J. (2014). The value relevance of reputation for sustainability leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A., Lovins, L., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowitt, E. (2013). The collaborative economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydenberg, S., & Wood, D. (2010). How to read a corporate social responsibility report: A user’s guide. Boston College: Institute for Responsible Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, D. (2007). The sustainable supply chain. Supply Chain Management Review, 11(8), 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainieri, T., Barnett, E., Valdero, T., Unipan, J., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandip, G. (2012). Green HRM: People management commitment to environmental sustainability. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1(ISC-2011), 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, C. (2008). General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: A survey 1990-2007. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. G., & De Leon, P. (2007). Contexts and corporate voluntary environmental behaviors: Examining the EPA’s green lights voluntary program. Organization & Environment, 20(4), 480–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulani, N. (2009). Sustainability: Your role as a supply chain leader. Logistics Management, 23(5), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumcu, A., & Ufacık, O. (2016). A research on sustainability indices: BIST Sustainability Index. In Social and economic perspectives on sustainability (pp. 264–269). London: IJOPEC Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özçelik, F., & Öztürk, B. (2014). Evaluation of banks’ sustainability performance in Turkey with grey relational analysis. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 63, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K., Oates, W., & Portney, P. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M. (2001). Risky business: Insurance companies in global warming politics. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 18–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca, L., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business and Strategy Environment, 20(4), 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stormer, F. (2003). Making the shift: Moving from “Ethics Pays” to an inter-systems model of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainability Framework 2.0. (2011). Professional accountants as integrators (pp. 1–202). New York: IFAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. (2009). Going green? Start with sourcing. Supply Chain Management Review, 13(3), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2017). Sustainable development goals. Accessed http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2015/07/un-projects-world-population-to-reach-8-5-billion-by-2030-driven-by-growth-in-developing-countries/

  • Vanclay, J., Shortiss, J., Aulsebrook, S., Gillespie, A., Howell, B., Johanni, R., et al. (2011). Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). Turkey. Accessed http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık: Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behavior when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey

    Ayca Kubra Hizarci-Payne & Berna Kirkulak-Uludag

Authors
  1. Ayca Kubra Hizarci-Payne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Berna Kirkulak-Uludag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayca Kubra Hizarci-Payne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Antwerp Management School, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lars Moratis

  2. NHTV Breda University of Applied Science, Breda, The Netherlands

    Frans Melissen

  3. Guildhall Faculty of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hizarci-Payne, A.K., Kirkulak-Uludag, B. (2018). Sustainable Business Practices of Turkish Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation