eHealth Applications in Portuguese Hospitals: A Continuous Benchmarking with European Hospitals

  • João Vidal Carvalho
  • Álvaro Rocha
  • António Abreu
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 721)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe and compare the use of eHealth applications in selected European Union (EU) countries. Using data available from the European Hospital Survey (2012/2013), the study reported in this paper analyses the adoption of five of the most commonly used Health Applications in European Hospitals, namely Electronic Patient Records (EPR), Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), ePrescribing, Integrated system for eReferral and Tele-monitoring. The analysis of the adoption of these applications by the Hospitals allows us to understand the position of Portugal in relation to the European average. It has been found that the Portuguese Hospitals are well positioned with regard to the adoption of these applications and in spite of this, remains a permanent concern to raise the levels of adoption of these applications through new projects in progress.

Keywords

eHealth Hospital information systems Health information systems eHealth applications Portugal 

References

  1. 1.
    Carvalho, J.V., Rocha, Á., Abreu, A.: HISMM–hospital information system maturity model: a synthesis. In: International Conference on Software Process Improvement, vol. 537, p. 189–200. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitterer, R., Rohner, P.: Towards assessing the networkability of health care providers: a maturity model approach. Inf. Syst. e-Bus Manag. 8, 309–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ludwick, D., Doucette, J.: Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(1), 22–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jha, A.K., et al.: Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(16), 1628–1638 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahtonen, A.: Healthy and active ageing: turning the silver economy into gold. European Policy Centre, Europe’s Political Economy–Coalition for Health, Ethics and Society (CHES) (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buntin, M.B., et al.: The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff. 30(3), 464–471 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mettler, T.: Transformation of the hospital supply chain: how to measure the maturity of supplier relationship management systems in hospitals? Int. J. Healthc. Inf. Syst. Inf. 6(2), 1–13 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma, B.: Electronic Healthcare Maturity Model (eHMM): A White Paper. Quintegra Solutions Limited (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NHS, Information Management and Technology (IM&T) Strategy 2012–2017: To provide the knowledge, skills, technology and tools that enable information to be collected, managed, used and shared to deliver excellence in healthcare. Mid-Cheshire Hospitals NHS Found Trust (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Commission To The European Parliament: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, eHealth Action Plan 2012–2020 – Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. COM (2012) 736 final (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The European Commission: European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking Deployment of eHealth Services (2012–2013) Final report. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    OECD: Strengthening Health Information Infrastructure for Health Care Quality Governance: Good Practices, New Opportunities and Data Privacy Protection Challenges. OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing, ‎Paris (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Priestman, W.: ICT Strategy 2007–2011 for The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust. Trust Board Meeting 6th November 2007, Doc Number: V1.4 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, H.K.: PACS is only in the beginning of being used as a clinical research tool. In: The 24th International EuroPACS Conference, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 1–10 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson, D., Flynn, K.: Picture Archiving and Communication Systems: A Systematic Review of Published Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy. Radiology Work Processes, Outcomes of Care, and Cost. Technology Assessment Program. Report No. 5 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, H.K.: Some historical remarks on picture archiving and communication systems. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 27, 93–99 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van de Wetering, R., Batenburg, R.: A PACS maturity model: A systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int. J. Med. Informatics 78, 127–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patrao, L., Deveza, R., Martins, H.: PEM-A new patient centred electronic prescription platform. Procedia Technology 9, 1313–1319 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, A.H., et al.: eReferral–a new model for integrated care. N. Engl. J. Med. 368(26), 2450–2453 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ATA. What is Telemedicine? American Telemedicine Association 2012, October 2015, http://www.americantelemed.org/about-telemedicine/what-is-telemedicine
  21. 21.
    Currie, W., Seddon, J.: A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: some policy and research directions. Inf. Manag. 51(6), 783–797 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piha, T.: How Can the EU Drive ehealth Development? Mede-Tel, Luxembourg: European Commission. DG Health and Consumers (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    European-Commission.: Directive 2011/24/Eu of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the Application of Patients’ Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare. Brussels: European Commission (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    epSOS, Smart Open Services for European Patients–WP 1.1: Analysis and Comparison of National Plans/Solutions. European Commission (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    European-Commission: SIBIS Report No. 9: Benchmarking e-Health in the IS in Europe and the US. European Commission (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Empirica: Benchmarking ICT Use among General Practitioners in Europe. Bonn: European Commission: Information Society and Media Directorate General (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    SPMS, Plano Estratégico SPMS 2017–2019 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    SPMS, PEM: Simplifica prescrição de produtos de apoio para pessoas com deficiência e com incapacidade temporária. Newsletter Cuidados de Saúde Hospitalares, 3 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Delgado, M.: Telemedicina em Hematologia: CHCB e CHUC Iniciam Colaboração. A Enfermagem e as Leis (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Vidal Carvalho
    • 1
  • Álvaro Rocha
    • 2
  • António Abreu
    • 1
  1. 1.Politécnico do Porto, ISCAP, CEOS.PPS. Mamede de InfestaPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia InformáticaUniversidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations