Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Good Luck with the Research That Will End Your Career

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Research Misconduct as White-Collar Crime

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, an account is given of the methodological choices and procedures that enabled the author to conduct empirical research on research misconduct. A research design mainly centred on qualitative methods was chosen, in contrast to most of the existing current studies using quantitative methodologies. An account of specificities to take into consideration when conducting qualitative studies is given, as well as descriptions of the research design, sampling procedures, and analyses conducted in the study. The challenges encountered when researching one’s own peers and working environment are also described, as well as the solutions found for overcoming such challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While a minority of interviewees raised concerns about scholars committing sexual harassment, this misbehaviour has not been acknowledged as a form of RM by the literature. Nonetheless, and in view of the shifting nature of RM, more recently some voices have asked for sexual harassment to be included in the list of situations labelled as RM (Kuo 2017).

  2. 2.

    In 2014, the President of the European Commission (EC) in office stated that ‘The European Union remains the largest knowledge factory in the world: it accounts for almost a third of global science and technology production. And despite the crisis, Europe and its Member States have managed to maintain this competitive knowledge position.’ The report ‘The future of Europe is science: a report of the president’s Science and Technology Advisory Council (STAC)’ is available online at the EC website.

  3. 3.

    This designation is largely influenced by the concept of ‘the looking glass self’ by Cooley, one of the most important authors from the school of thought of symbolic interactionism. I wish to thank Olga Petintseva for her time discussing these issues with me and which encouraged me to use such designation.

References

  • Alvesalo-Kuusi, A., & Whyte, D. (2017). Researching the Powerful: A Call for the Reconstruction of Research Ethics. Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsovska, J. (2012). Researching Difficult Populations: Interviewing Techniques and Methodological Issues in the Study of Organized Crime. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (pp. 397–415). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Coffey, A. (1997). Analysing Documentary Realities: In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 45–62). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. The State of the Art. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellard, A. (2012). A análise documental. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 295–316). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded Theory. Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2011). Formulating Criminological Research Questions. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Doing Criminological Research (pp. 36–53). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., & Francis, P. (2011). Doing Criminological Research. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Doing Criminological Research (pp. 99–107). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., Francis, P., & Jupp, V. (Eds.). (2011). Doing Criminological Research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2011). Sensitive Survey Research: An Oxymoron? In P. A. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Doing Criminological Research (2nd ed., pp. 139–160). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, R. (2009). Da intransparência ao crime na ciência e no ensino superior. Estudo empírico sobre os processos desviantes e corruptivos em Portugal (Master), Faculty of Arts, Porto University, Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, R., & Agra, C. (2012). Instransparência, desvio e crime na investigação científica e no ensino superior. In C. d. Agra (Ed.), A Criminologia: um arquipélago interdisciplinar (pp. 359–382). Porto: U.Porto Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 645–672). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir (25th ed.). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. O. (2010). Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2012). Sobre o método fenomenológico utilizado como modo de pesquisa qualitativa nas ciências humanas: teoria, prática e avaliação. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 386–409). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe, A. (2012). Trust and Regulatory Organisations: The Role of Local Knowledge and Facework in Research Ethics Review. Social Studies of Science, 42(5), 662–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M. and Gelsthorpe, L. (2017). Ethics in Criminological Research: A Powerful Force, or a Force for the Powerful? In M. Cowburn, L. Gelsthorpe, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Research Ethics in Criminology. Dilemmas, Issues and Solutions (pp. 185–203). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. J. (2000). The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 379–399). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabag, S. F., & Berggren, C. (2016). Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals. PLoS One, 11(7), e0159492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.

  • Kuntz, A. M., & Presnall, M. M. (2012). Wandering the Tactical: From Interview to Intraview. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 732–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, M. (2017). Society Labels Harassment as Research Misconduct. Geophysicists’ Plan to Merge Harassment with Traditional Forms of Misconduct Is Unwise, Critics Say. Science, 356(6335), 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laperrière, A. (2012a). Os critérios de cientificidade dos métodos qualitativos. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 410–435). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laperrière, A. (2012b). A teorização enraizada (Grounded Theory): procedimento analítico e comparação com outras abordagens similares. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 353–385). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2011). The Past, Present, and Future of Scientific Misconduct Research: What Has Been Done? What Needs to Be Done? The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic Integrity: A Review of the Literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (2012). Criminal Statistics and the Construction of Crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th ed., pp. 206–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeeley, S. (2012). Sensitive Issues in Surveys: Reducing Refusals While Increasing Reliability and Quality of Responses to Sensitive Survey Items. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (pp. 337–396). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelken, D. (2012). White-Collar and Corporate Crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th ed., pp. 623–659). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noaks, L., & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological Research. Understanding Qualitative Methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, N. L., & Clipper, S. (2014). White Collar Crime. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 5531–5538). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pires, Á. (1997a). De quelques enjeux épistémologiques d’une méthodologie générale pour les sciences sociales. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (pp. 3–54). Montréal: Gaëtan Morin, Éditeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, Á. (1997b). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: essai théorique et méthodologique. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (pp. 113–169). Montréal: Gaëtan Morin, Éditeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, Á. (2004). La recherche qualitative et le système pénal. Peut-on interroger les systèmes sociaux? In D. Kaminski & M. Kokoreff (Eds.), Sociologie pénale: système et expérience. Pour Claude Faugeron (pp. 173–198): Les Éditions Erès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, Á. (2012). Sobre algumas questões epistemológicas de uma metodologia geral para as ciências sociais. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 43–94). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poupart, J. (2012). A entrevista de tipo qualitativo: considerações epistemológicas, teóricas e metodológicas. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & Á. Pires (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos (pp. 215–253). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poupart, J., Deslauriers, J.-P., Groulx, L.-H., Laperrière, A., Mayer, R., & Pires, Á. (1997). La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin, Éditeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. (1997). Following in Foucault’s Footsteps: Text and Context in Qualitative Research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 63–79). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing Qualitative Data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruquoy, D. (1995). Situation d’entretien et stratégie de l’interviwer. In L. Albarello, F. Digneffe, J.-P. Hiernaux, C. Maroy, D. Ruquoy, & P. d. Saint-Georges (Eds.), Pratiques et méthodes e recherche en science sociales (pp. 59–82). Paris: Arman Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Georges, P. d. (1995). Recherche et critique des sources de documentation dans les domaines économique, social et politique. In L. Albarello, F. Digneffe, J.-P. Hiernaux, C. Maroy, D. Ruquoy, & P. d. Saint-Georges (Eds.), Pratiques et méthodes de recherche en sciences sociales (pp. 9–31). Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, I., & Flyged, J. (2016). Doing Business for a ‘Higher Loyalty’? How Swedish Transnational Corporations Neutralise Allegations of Crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (1999). The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Semmens, N. (2011). Methodological Approaches to Criminological Research. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Doing Criminological Research (pp. 54–77). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, N. (2007). Collecting Data from Elites and Ultra Elites: Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews with Macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1994). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp, H. (2010). Strengthening Awareness About Researchers Who Are Bringing Unwelcome News. In R. J. i. t. Veld (Ed.), Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media (pp. 215–225). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walburg, C. (2015). The Measurement of Corporate Crime: An Exercise in Futility? In J. v. Erp, W. Huisman, & G. V. Walle (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime in Europe (pp. 25–38). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliman, N. (2011). Research Methods: The Basics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, J. (2016). An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wincup, E. (2009). Researching Crime and Criminal Justice. In C. Hale, K. Hayward, A. Wahidin, & E. Wincup (Eds.), Criminology (2nd ed., pp. 103–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingerde, K. v. (2015). The Limits of Environmental Regulation in a Globalized Economy. In J. v. Erp, W. Huisman, & G. V. Walle (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime in Europe (pp. 260–275). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminology, Faculty of Law, Universidade do Porto, Interdisciplinary Research Centre on Crime, Justice and Security, Porto, Portugal

    Rita Faria

Authors
  1. Rita Faria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Faria .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Faria, R. (2018). Good Luck with the Research That Will End Your Career. In: Research Misconduct as White-Collar Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73435-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73435-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73434-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73435-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation