Advertisement

Medical Marginalia in the Early Printed Books of University of Glasgow Library

  • Robert MacLean
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

Reader marginalia are one of the most valuable forms of paratext available to researchers. They offer great potential towards a better understanding of how early modern people read and engaged with books as texts and as physical objects. With so many early published works focusing on medicine and health, marginalia offer particular opportunities for those interested in medical history. This chapter will demonstrate how major cataloguing projects like the Glasgow Incunabula Project are uncovering fascinating examples of medical-related reader marginalia and creating online finding aids, which make it easier for researchers to locate and access early annotated books. Yet large numbers of books remain entirely hidden from view to researchers, either completely uncatalogued or catalogued without copy-specific metadata. This chapter will urge marginalia researchers to liaise with and collaborate with librarians and curators more closely in future to help tackle this issue and allow researchers to begin to address broader research questions.

Bibliography

  1. Annotated Books Online. 2017. A Digital Archive of Early Modern Annotated Books. http://www.annotatedbooksonline.com/. Accessed 27 June.
  2. Archaeology of Reading. 2016. The Archaeology of Reading in Early Modern Europe. Last modified, September. http://archaeologyofreading.org/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
  3. Baudrier, Henri Louis. 1895–1921. Bibliographie lyonnaise : recherches sur les imprimeurs, libraires, relieurs et fondeurs de lettres de Lyon au XVIe siècle. Lyon: Librairie Ancienne d’Auguste Brun.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, Ann M. 2010. Too Much To Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brayman Hackel, Heidi. 2005. Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. CERL. 2016. Material Evidence in Incunabula. Last modified, June 30, 2016. https://www.cerl.org/resources/mei/main
  7. Craik, Katherine. 2007. Reading Sensations in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vos, Paula. 2013. “The Prince of Medicine” Yūḥannā Ibn Māsawayh and the Foundations of Western Pharmaceutical Tradition. ISIS: A Journal of the History of Science Society 104: 667–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durkan, John, and James Kirk. 1977. The University of Glasgow 1451–1577. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Press.Google Scholar
  10. Durkan, John, and Anthony Ross. 1961. Early Scottish Libraries. Glasgow: John S. Burn and Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Jardine, Lisa, and Anthony Grafton. 1990. ‘Studied for Action’: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy. Past and Present 129: 30–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Physiology of Reading. In The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making, 380–443. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, Helen. 2007. Midwifery, Obstetrics and the Rise of Gynaecology: The Use of a Sixteenth-Century Compendium. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Klebs, Arnold C. 1963. Incunabula Scientifica et medica. Hildesheim: George Olms.Google Scholar
  15. Maley, Sonny. 2014. Unexpected Notes on Syphilis, University of Glasgow Library Blog. December 5. https://universityofglasgowlibrary.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/unexpected-notes-on-syphilis/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
  16. Nutton, Vivian. 1985. Illustrations from the Wellcome Institute Library: Conrad Gesner and the English Naturalists. Medical History 29: 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pettegree, Andrew. 2011. The Book in the Renaissance. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Plate, S. Brent. 2015. Marginalia and Its Disruptions. Los Angeles Review of Books. 16 December. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/marginalia-and-its-disruptions. Accessed 4 July 2016.
  19. RLUK. 2010. Hidden Collections: Report of the Findings of the RLUK Retrospective Cataloguing Survey in Association with The London Library. http://www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RLUK-Hidden-Collections.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
  20. Sherman, William H. 2008. Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, Helen. 2010. “More swete vnto the eare/than holsome for ye mynde”: Embodying Early Modern Women’s Reading. Huntington Library Quarterly 73 (3): 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. University of Glasgow Library. 2017a. Glasgow Incunabula Project. http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/incunabula/. Accessed 23 June.
  23. ———. 2017b. Syphilis Collection. http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/specialcollections/collectionsa-z/syphiliscollection/. Accessed 26 June 2017.
  24. University of Oxford. 2017. Reading Practices, University of Oxford 15cBooktrade. http://15cbooktrade.ox.ac.uk/reading-practices/. Accessed 23 June.
  25. van der Sijs, Nicoline, ed. 2010. Guichelheil (Anagallis arvensis), Etymologiebank.nl. http://www.etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/guichelheil. Accessed 26 June 2017. Reference derives from H. Kleijn. 1970. Planten en hun naam. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert MacLean
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Glasgow LibraryGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations