Advertisement

Brexit pp 99-112 | Cite as

Great Britain and Differentiated Integration in Europe

  • Rafał Riedel
Chapter

Abstract

The United Kingdom has always been a special case in the European integration project. The British exceptionalism manifested in various forms and ways over the history. June 23rd 2016 delivered another culmination point in the story of the stubborn European’s relations with its continental partners. The so-called Brexit referendum, which brought about victory for the supporters of the UK leaving the European Union, marks an important milestone in these relations. It has never been an easy marriage and many times threatened by the divorce. Instead of becoming ever closer, the European Union becomes ever loser and the UK is ever closer to leaving. Brexit is not only vital for the British, it is potentially destructive for the EU from the core. The UK changes its status inside from an integration-tolerant country (not a very ambitious one anyway), to integration unfriendly country, which endangers the very fundaments of the integration process. It produces externalities to be consumed by other Member States and non-members as well.

Accordingly, the main purpose of this chapter is to shed light on the positive discrimination of the UK inside the EU and its entertaining the status of a preferential membership. The referendum is seen as a game in which London tried to win even more beneficial conditions inside the EU and now, after the referendum, will try to build a status of a preferential non-membership. From this perspective, this process can be seen as an exercise in searching the limits of differentiated integration. The problem has always been there, the Brexit referendum made it crystal clear. It may serve as a wakeup call for the necessary reforms of the EU.

Based on the analysis of the existing literature about the differentiated integration, this contribution sees the June 2016 Brexit referendum as a structural problem for the EU. Following the logic of the integration evolution from one crisis to another one, it is possible to interpret the Brexit decision as an opportunity for the EU’s reforms. The reformist impulse of Brexit may enhance the European integration in two various possible ways. First, it may help to reform the EU into a more differentiated system that will allow accommodate countries willing to integrate at various speeds and extends. Secondly, once “getting rid” of the major troublemaker and marauder, that is Britain as a country opposing the further integration, the EU may accelerate now towards the “ever closer union”.

Keywords

United Kingdom Brexit referendum Differentiated integration Europe 

References

  1. Allemand F (2005) The impact of the EU enlargement on economic and Monetary Union: what lessons can be learnt from the differentiated integration mechanisms in an enlarged Europe? Eur Law J 11(5):586–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen SS, Sitter N (2006) Differentiated integration: what is it and how much can the EU accomodate? Eur Integr 28(4):313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein A (2016) To brexit or to brexit?, “News Extra” April 2016, p 7Google Scholar
  4. Cameron D (2016) The future of the EU and the UK’s relationship with it, London, 23 Jan 2013, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-speech-at-bloomberg. Accessed 20 June 2016
  5. Daddow O (2015) Interpreting the outsider tradition in British European policy speeches from Thatcher to Cameron. J Common Mark Stud 53(1):71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Neve J-E (2007) The European onion? How differentiated integration is reshaping the EU. Eur Integr 29(4):503–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyson K, Sepos A (2010) Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In: Dyson K, Sepos A (eds) Which Europe? The politics of differentiated integration. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 3–23Google Scholar
  8. Fontana G, Parsons C (2015) ‘One woman’s prejudice’: did Margaret Thatcher cause Britains’ anti-Europeanis? J Common Mark Stud 53(1):89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fossum JE (2015) Democracy and differentiation in Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (2014) Introduction: beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers. In: Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (eds) Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  11. Glencross A (2015) Why a British referendum on EU membership will not solve the Europe question. Int Aff 91(2):303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilton A (2016) Statement in: “The London Evening Standard” 25 February 2016Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson P (2016) Complying with Brexit, “Complience Week” May 2016, pp 53–55Google Scholar
  14. Jensen D, Slapin J (2012) Institutional hokey-pokey: the politics of multispeed integration in the European Union. J Eur Publ Policy 19(6):779–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kenny M, Pearse N (2016) After Brexit. The Eurosceptic dream of an Anglosphere. Juncture 22(4):304–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kölliker A (2001) Bringing together or driving apart the union? Towards a theory of differentiated integration. West Eur Polit 24(4):125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemke C (2014) Challenging the “ever closer union”: political consequences of the Eurozone crisis. Am Foreign Policy Interests 36:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leruth B (2015) Operationalizing national preferences on Europe and differentiated integration. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):816–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leruth B, Lord C (2015) Differentiated integration in the European Union: a concept, a process, a system or a theory? J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):754–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leuffen D, Rittberger B, Schimmelfennig F (2013) Differentiated integration. Explaining variation in the European Union. Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohler L, Seitz M (2012) The gains from variety in the European Union. Rev World Econ 148:475–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliver T (2015) To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britains’ European question and an in/out referendum. Int Aff 91(1):77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qvartrup M (2016) Referendums on membership and European integration. Polit Q 87(1):61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schimmelfennig F (2014) EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment? J Eur Publ Policy 21(5):681–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schimmelfennig F, Winzen T (2014) Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 52(2):354–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schimmelfennig F, Leufen D, Rittberger B (2015) The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicisation, differentiation. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):764–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schweiger C, Magone J (2014) Differentiated integration and cleavage under crisis conditions. Perspect Eur Polit Soc 15(3):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szwarc M (2015) Zróżnicowana integracja i wzmocniona współpraca w prawie Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2005Google Scholar
  29. Winzen T, Schimmelfennig F (2015) The choice for differentiated Europe; Why European Union member states opt out of integration. Paper prepared for the 14th biennial conference of the European Union Studies Association, 5–7 March 2015, Boston MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhelyankova A (2014) From selective integration into selective implementation: the link between differentiated integration and conformity with EU laws. Eur J Polit Res 53:727–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zielonka J (2007) Europa jako imperium. Nowe spojrzenie na Unię Europejską. PISM, WarszawaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafał Riedel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceOpole UniversityOpolePoland

Personalised recommendations