Abstract
In this chapter, the soil conditions in the Bucharest area are evaluated using several approaches based on both observed and simulated ground motion recordings. The analysis of the recorded ground motions shows the fact that significant long-period spectral ordinates are encountered for large magnitude Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic events. A soil class C according to EN 1998-1/2004 can be assigned for Bucharest based on the shear-wave velocities of the existing boreholes in this area. However, the much deeper Quaternary sediments from the Bucharest area can generate significant long-period spectral ordinates largely exceeding the ones for a typical soil class C site. The nonlinear ground response analysis performed for INCERC site in the eastern part of Bucharest revealed ground motions with a frequency content similar to the one of the ground motion recorded during the Vrancea 1977 earthquake. Besides the peak in amplitude corresponding to a spectral period of around 1.5 s, some additional analyses have shown that another peak at around 5 s can be inferred from the available data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arion C, Calarasu E, Neagu C (2015) Evaluation of Bucharest soil liquefaction potential. Mathe Model Civ Eng 11(1):40–48
Bala A, Hannich D, Ritter JRR, Ciugudean-Toma V (2011) Geological and geophysical model of the quaternary layers based on in situ measurements in Bucharest, Romania. Rom Rep Phys 63:250–274
CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Standard EN 1998-1, Brussels
Cioflan CO, Marmureanu A, Marmureanu G (2009) Nonlinearity in seismic site effects evaluation. Rom J Phys 54:951–963
Grecu B, Radulian M, Mandrescu N (2007) Panza GF (2007) H/V spectral ratios technique application in the city of Bucharest: can we get rid of source effect? JSEE Spring Summer 9:1–14
Hartzell S (1979) Analysis of the Bucharest strong ground motion for the March 4, 1977 Romanian earthquake. B Seismol Soc Am 69:513–530
Lungu D, Cornea T, Aldea A, Zaicenco A (1997) “Basic representation of seismic action”, in design of structures in seismic zones: Eurocode 8—worked examples. In: Lungu D, Mazzolani F, Savidis S (eds) TEMPUS PHARE CM project 01198: implementation of structural Eurocodes in Romanian civil engineering standards. Bridgeman Ltd, Timisoara, pp 1–60
Lungu D, Aldea A, Moldoveanu T, Ciugudean V, Stefanica M (1999) Near-surface geology and dynamic properties of soil layers in Bucahrest. In: Wenzel F, Lungu D (eds) Vrancea earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 137–148
Manea EF, Michel C, Poggi V, Fäh D, Radulian M, Balan SF (2016) Improving the shear wave velocity structure beneath Bucharest (Romania) using ambient vibrations. Geophys J Int 207:848–861
Munich Reinsurance Company (ed. 1998), World Map of Natural Hazards, Munich Re, Munich
Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep Railway Techn Res Inst 30(1):25–33
Neagu C, Arion C (2012) Dynamic laboratory investigation for soil seismic response. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, paper no. 2051
P100-1/2013 (2013) Code for seismic design—part I—design prescriptions for buildings. Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania
Pavel F (2017) Investigation on the variability of simulated and observed ground motions for the Bucharest area. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297266
Pitilakis K (2017) Site classification and definition of seismic actions in the revision of EC8. In: Keynote lecture presented during the 6th national conference on earthquake engineering and 2nd national conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Bucharest, Romania
Sandi H, Borcia IS (2011) A summary of instrumental data on the recent strong Vrancea earthquakes, and implications for seismic hazard. Pure appl Geophys 168:659–694
Woessner J, Danciu L, Giardini D, Crowley H, Cotton F, Grünthal G, Valensise G, Arvidsson R, Basili R, Demircioglu MB, Hiemer S, Meletti C, RMW M, Rovida AN, Sesetyan K, Stucchi M, the SHARE Consortium (2015) The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results. Bull Earthq Eng 13(2):3553–3596
Zaharia B, Radulian M, Popa M, Grecu B, Bala A, Tataru D (2008) Estimation of the local response using the Nakamura method for the Bucharest area. Rom Rep Phys 60:131–144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pavel, F., Popa, V., Vacareanu, R. (2018). Evaluation of Soil Conditions in Bucharest. In: Impact of Long-Period Ground Motions on Structural Design: A Case Study for Bucharest, Romania. SpringerBriefs in Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73401-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73402-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)