Advertisement

Introduction

  • Marc Champagne
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 19)

Abstract

In this introductory chapter, I preview how philosophy of signs can advance current debates about consciousness. Many philosophers have urged us to distinguish between what an experience does and what an experience feels like. This distinction seems sensible enough, but it renders scientific inquiry insufficient, insofar as experimental methods can only track an experience’s detectable effects. However, Charles Sanders Peirce, the polymath who coined the term “qualia,” saw no tension in this function/quality distinction. Peirce was the founder of American pragmatism and a professional scientist, so he clearly valued tangible verification. Still, his philosophical system countenanced intrinsic qualities under the heading of “Firstness.” Since qualia are usually considered to be at odds with pragmatic verification, I set out to understand how Peirce could (or thought he could) have it both ways. The key, I suggest, is to see how we can sometimes insert distinctions between features that are always bound together. Such “prescissive” distinctions are essential to understanding how signs work. So, while semiotics is currently the least known branch of philosophy ending in –ics, a better understanding of that branch can remedy much of the current puzzlement about qualia.

References

  1. Bellucci F, Pietarinen A-V, Stjernfelt F (eds) (2014) Peirce: 5 questions. Automatic Press/VIP, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  2. Block N (1995) On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 18(2):227–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brent J (1998) Charles Sanders Peirce: a life. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Chalmers DJ (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 2(3):200–219Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers DJ (1996) The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchland PM (1996) The engine of reason, the seat of the soul: a philosophical journey into the brain. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen MA, Dennett DC (2011) Consciousness cannot be separated from function. Trends Cogn Sci 15(8):358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colapietro VM (1989) Peirce’s approach to the self: a semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Dayton E (2016) Clarence Irving Lewis. In: Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Available via http://www.iep.utm.edu/lewisci/. Accessed 5 July 2016
  10. Deely JN (2009) Basics of semiotics, 5th edn. Tartu University Press, TartuGoogle Scholar
  11. Eco U (1976) A theory of semiotics (trans: Osmond-smith D). Indiana University Press, BloomingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eco U (1990) The limits of interpretation. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Eco U (2000) Kant and the platypus: essays on language and cognition (trans: McEwen A). Harcourt Brace and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Fetzer JH (1988) Signs and minds: an introduction to the theory of semiotic systems. In: Fetzer JH (ed) Aspects of artificial intelligence. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fetzer JH (2003) Consciousness and cognition: semiotic conceptions of bodies and minds. In: Smith Q, Jokic A (eds) Consciousness: new philosophical perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 298–322Google Scholar
  16. Fisch MH (1983) Just how general is Peirce’s general theory of signs? Am J Semiot 2(1–2):55–60Google Scholar
  17. Fisch MH (1986) Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Harman G (1990) The intrinsic quality of experience. In: Tomberlin JE (ed) Philosophical perspectives, vol vol 4. Ridgeview, Atascadero, pp 31–52Google Scholar
  19. Hattiangadi J (2005) The mind as an object of scientific study. In: Erneling CE, Johnson DM (eds) The mind as scientific object: between brain and culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 342–366Google Scholar
  20. Hirst RJ (1959) The problems of perception. George Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Houser N (1983) Peirce’s general taxonomy of consciousness. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 19(4):331–359Google Scholar
  22. Jackson F (1982) Epiphenomenal qualia. Philos Q 32(127):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakobson R (1971) Selected writings, volume II: word and language. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  24. Jakobson R (1979) Coup d’œil sur le développement de la sémiotique. In: Chatman S, Eco U, Klinkenberg J-M (eds) A semiotic landscape. Mouton, The Hague, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  25. Jakobson R (1988) A glance at the development of semiotics. In: Pomorska K, Rudy S (eds) Language in literature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 436–454Google Scholar
  26. Jakobson R, Pomorska K (1983) Dialogues. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Käufer S, Chemero A (2015) Phenomenology. Polity, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  28. Legg C (2013) What is a logical diagram? In: Moktefi A, Shin S-J (eds) Visual reasoning with diagrams. Birkhäuser, Heidelberg, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  29. Levine J (1997) On leaving out what it’s like. In: Block N, Flanagan O, Güzeldere G (eds) The nature of consciousness: philosophical debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 543–555Google Scholar
  30. Lewis CI (1918) A survey of symbolic logic. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis CI (1946) An analysis of knowledge and valuation. Open Court, La SalleGoogle Scholar
  32. Liszka JJ (1996) A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Livingston PM (2004) Philosophical history and the problem of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDermott D (2007) Dodging the explanatory gap—or bridging it. Behav Brain Sci 30(5–6):518Google Scholar
  35. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83(4):435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagel T (2012) Mind and cosmos: why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Papineau D (2002) Thinking about consciousness. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peirce CS (1931–58) The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Peirce CS (1992) The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, vol 1. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Peirce CS (1998) The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, vol 2. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Pietarinen A-V (2006) Signs of logic: Peircean themes on the philosophy of language, games, and communication. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Polidoro P (2015) Umberto Eco and the problem of iconism. Semiotica 206:129–160Google Scholar
  43. Prinz JJ (2012) The conscious brain: how attention engenders experience. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Proni G (2015) Umberto Eco and Charles Peirce: a slow and respectful convergence. Semiotica 206:13–35Google Scholar
  45. Queiroz J, Atã P (2014) Iconicity in Peircean situated cognitive semiotics. In: Thellefsen T, Sørensen B (eds) Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 283–289Google Scholar
  46. Quine WVO (1933) Reviews: collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Isis 19(1):220–229Google Scholar
  47. Roberts DD (1973) The existential graphs of Charles S. Peirce. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross D, Spurrett D (2004) What to say to a skeptical metaphysician: a defense manual for cognitive and behavioral scientists. Behav Brain Sci 27(5):603–627Google Scholar
  49. Russell B (1910–11) Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–128Google Scholar
  50. Russell B (1998) The philosophy of logical atomism. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Rydenfelt H (2014) Peirce in Finland. European J Pragmatism Am Philos 6(1):51–57Google Scholar
  52. Sebeok TA (1979) The sign and its masters. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  53. Sebeok TA (1991) Semiotics in the United States. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  54. Spiegelberg H (1956) Husserl’s and Peirce’s phenomenologies: coincidence or interaction. Philos Phenomenol Res 17(2):164–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steiner P (2013) C. S. Peirce and artificial intelligence: historical heritage and (new) theoretical stakes. In: Müller VC (ed) Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stjernfelt F (2007) Diagrammatology: an investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stjernfelt F (2013) The generality of signs: the actual relevance of anti-psychologism. Semiotica 194(1–4):77–109Google Scholar
  58. Varela FJ (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. J Conscious Stud 3(4):330–349Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Champagne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations