Advertisement

Involvement of Human Capital: Time for Teamwork

  • Flevy Lasrado
  • Vijay Pereira
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we focus on how people and teamwork can be leveraged for human excellence in organisations. The business excellence (BE) maturity of an organisation depends on embedded organisational changes, which in turn affect the way human resource (HR) considerations are formed in relation to strategic quality goals. It is now evident that quality experts, researchers, academics, and practitioners have realised that human capital development should be at the core of the quality philosophy and that employee involvement and commitment is essential to the successful introduction and implementation of quality initiatives, programmes, or practices and techniques (Blackburn and Rosen 1993; Soltani et al. 2004; Soltani 2003). Thus, BE has a high HR context, and this quality movement recognises the importance of HR utilisation and states a conceptual and well-defined image concerning human behaviour and motivation (Pfeffer 1994). Research evidence also suggests that as total quality management (TQM) improvement efforts proceed, a change in the corporate culture occurs, resulting in the establishment of a work climate in which participation, trust, responsibility for goal achievement, and employee involvement take place (Lawler 1994).

References

  1. Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1993). Total quality and human resources management: Lessons learned from Baldrige award-winning companies. The Academy of Management Executive, 7(3), 49–66.Google Scholar
  2. Bou-Llusar, J. C., Escrig-Tena, A. B., Roca-Puig, V., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2005). To what extent do enablers explain results in the EFQM excellence model? An empirical study. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 22(4), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buech, V. I. D., Michel, A., & Sonntag, K. (2010). Suggestion systems in organizations: What motivates employees to submit suggestions? European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Relationships between the EFQM model criteria: A study in Spanish universities. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(6), 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dijkstra, L. (1997). An empirical interpretation of the EFQM framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Plessis, A. J., Marx, A. E., & Wilson, G. (2008). Generating ideas and managing suggestion systems in organisations: Some empirical evidence. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 8(4), 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eskildsen, J. K. (1998). Identifying the vital few using the European Foundation for Quality Management Model. Total Quality Management, 9(4–5), 92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eskildsen, J. K., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2000). A causal model for employee satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1081–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Lawler, E. E. (1994). Total quality management and employee involvement: Are they compatible? The Academy of Management Executive, 8(1), 68–76.Google Scholar
  11. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. California Management Review, 36(2), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prabhu, V., Appleby, A., Yarrow, D., & Mitchell, E. (2000). The impact of ISO 9000 and TQM on best practice/performance. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ritchie, L., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Self-assessment using the business excellence model: A study of practice and process. International Journal of Production Economics, 66(3), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Safari, H., Abdollahi, B., & Ghasemi, R. (2012). Canonical correlation analysis between people criterion and people results criterion in EFQM model. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 23(5–6), 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scholl, A., Manthey, L., Helm, R., & Steiner, M. (2005). Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(3), 760–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shergold, K., & Reed, D. M. (1996). Striving for excellence: How self-assessment using the business excellence model can result in step improvements in all areas of business activities. The TQM Magazine, 8(6), 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Soltani, E. (2003). Towards a TQM-driven HR performance evaluation: An empirical study. Employee Relations, 25(4), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soltani, E., Gennard, J., Van der Meer, R. B., & Williams, T. (2004). HR performance evaluation in the context of TQM: A review of the literature. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(4), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarí, J. J. (2010). Self-assessment processes: The importance of follow-up for success. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Dijk, C., & Van Den Ende, J. (2002). Suggestion systems: Transferring employee creativity into practicable ideas. R&D Management, 32(5), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Donk, D. P., & Sanders, G. (1993). Organizational culture as a missing link in quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 10(5), 5–15.Google Scholar
  23. Wilkinson, A., Godfrey, G., & Marchington, M. (1997). Bouquets, brickbats and blinkers: Total quality management and employee involvement in practice. Organization Studies, 18(5), 799–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang, J. B., Dale, B. G., & Siow, C. H. R. (2001). Self-assessment of excellence: An application of the evidential reasoning approach. International Journal of Production Research, 39(16), 3789–3812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yin, R. R. (2004). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Zaremba, D., & Crew, T. (1995). Increasing involvement in self-assessment: The royal mail approach. The TQM Magazine, 7(2), 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flevy Lasrado
    • 1
  • Vijay Pereira
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Wollongong in DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations