Abstract
The previous chapter addressed the dimensions of climate change as a globalized risk (Beck in World at risk, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009), and it is argued that a globalized perspective requires a transnational methodological framework for assessing the new dimensions of interdependent risk journalism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166.
Anheier, H. K., & Themudo, N. (2002). Organisational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 191–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anheier, H. K., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2001). Global civil society 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anheier, H., Kaldor, M., & Glasius, M. (2012). The global civil society yearbook: Lessons and insights 2001–2011. In M. Kaldor, H. L. Moore, & S. Selchow (Eds.), Global civil society 2012: Ten years of critical reflection (pp. 2–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beck, U. (2008). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boykoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.
Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959.
Carvalho, A. (2010a). Climate change as a ‘grand narrative’ (Interview by Filippo Bonaventura). Journal of Science Communication, 9(4), 1–4. Retrieved from http://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/Jcom0904(2010)C03.pdf.
Carvalho, A. (2010b). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13.
Castells, M. (2002). Local and global: Cities in the network society. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(5), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00225.
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/25097995.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chandhoke, N. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 35–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chernilo, D. (2011). The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history. Thesis Eleven, 106(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513611415789.
Climate and Development Knowledge Network. (2012). Scoping a combined programme on climate compatible development for Pakistan. Retrieved from http://cdkn.org/project/scoping-a-combined-programme-on-climate-compatible-development-for-pakistan/?loclang=en_gb.
Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6.
Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5.
Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199.
Eurobarometer. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 364: Public awareness and acceptance of CO 2 capture and storage. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf.
Fischer, M. (2006). Civil society in conflict transformation: Ambivalence, potentials and challenges. Retrieved from Berghof Foundation website: http://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/fischer_cso_handbook.pdf.
Giddens, A. (1973). The class structure of the advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Godfrey, A., Burton, M., & Leroux-Rutledge, E. (Eds.). (2012). “Africa talks climate”: Comparing audience understandings of climate change in ten African countries. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189.
Harbinson, R., Mugara, R., & Chawla, A. (2006). Whatever the weather: Media attitudes to reporting climate change. Retrieved from PANOS website: http://panos.org.uk/wp-content/files/2011/03/whatever_weathermjwnSt.pdf.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of capitalism. New York: Guilford Press.
Herod, A. (2010). Scale. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Kaldor, M. (2003a). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kaldor, M. (2003b). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.
Karns, M. P., & Mingst, K. A. (2004). International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Keane, J. (2001). Global civil society? In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001 (pp. 23–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martins, H. (1974). Time and theory in sociology (Chapter 12). In J. Rex (Ed.), Approaches to sociology (pp. 246–294). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Paton, K., & Fairbairn-Dunlop, P. (2010). Listening to local voices: Tuvaluans respond to climate change. Local Environment, 15(7), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.498809.
Pillay, K., & Maharaj, M. (2010). An overview of Web 2.0 social media as a tool for advocacy. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Scoring IT education goals in 2010’ of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, June 7–9, Pretoria. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoj_Maharaj/publication/266502528_An_Overview_of_Web_2.0_Social_Media_as_a_tool_for_advocacy/links/543bb95d0cf2d6698be31c45.pdf.
Rantanen, T. (2007). The cosmopolitanization of news. Journalism Studies, 8(6), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701556765.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., & Naess, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 778–795.
Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73(4), 109.
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. (2004). The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43.
Sassen, S. (2007). Sociology of globalization. New York: W.W. Norton.
Sassen, S. (2008). Neither global nor national: Novel assemblages of territory, authority and rights. Ethics and Global Politics, 1(1–2), 61–79.
Simmons, P. J. (1998). Learning to live with NGOs. Foreign Policy, 112, 82.
Smith, A. D. (1979). Nationalism in the twentieth century. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Smith, N. (1990). Uneven development (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Söderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. M. (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London and New York: Routledge.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
Volkmer, I. (2012). Deconstructing the “Methodological Paradox”: Comparative research between national centrality and networked spaces. In I. Volkmer (Ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 110–122). London: Blackwell Publishing.
Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.
Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283.
Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Volkmer, I., Sharif, K. (2018). Towards Cosmopolitan Relational ‘Scales’ of Actoral Interconnectivity. In: Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate Change. The Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73308-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73308-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73307-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73308-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)