Advertisement

Towards Cosmopolitan Relational ‘Scales’ of Actoral Interconnectivity

  • Ingrid Volkmer
  • Kasim Sharif
Chapter
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication book series (PIPC)

Abstract

The previous chapter addressed the dimensions of climate change as a globalized risk (Beck in World at risk, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009), and it is argued that a globalized perspective requires a transnational methodological framework for assessing the new dimensions of interdependent risk journalism.

References

  1. Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anheier, H. K., & Themudo, N. (2002). Organisational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 191–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anheier, H. K., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2001). Global civil society 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anheier, H., Kaldor, M., & Glasius, M. (2012). The global civil society yearbook: Lessons and insights 2001–2011. In M. Kaldor, H. L. Moore, & S. Selchow (Eds.), Global civil society 2012: Ten years of critical reflection (pp. 2–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2008). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boykoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.  https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho, A. (2010a). Climate change as a ‘grand narrative’ (Interview by Filippo Bonaventura). Journal of Science Communication, 9(4), 1–4. Retrieved from http://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/Jcom0904(2010)C03.pdf.
  11. Carvalho, A. (2010b). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (2002). Local and global: Cities in the network society. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(5), 548–558.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00225.
  13. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25097995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chandhoke, N. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 35–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chernilo, D. (2011). The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history. Thesis Eleven, 106(1), 98–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513611415789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Climate and Development Knowledge Network. (2012). Scoping a combined programme on climate compatible development for Pakistan. Retrieved from http://cdkn.org/project/scoping-a-combined-programme-on-climate-compatible-development-for-pakistan/?loclang=en_gb.
  20. Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16, 93–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eurobarometer. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 364: Public awareness and acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf.
  24. Fischer, M. (2006). Civil society in conflict transformation: Ambivalence, potentials and challenges. Retrieved from Berghof Foundation website: http://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/fischer_cso_handbook.pdf.
  25. Giddens, A. (1973). The class structure of the advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Godfrey, A., Burton, M., & Leroux-Rutledge, E. (Eds.). (2012). “Africa talks climate”: Comparing audience understandings of climate change in ten African countries. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harbinson, R., Mugara, R., & Chawla, A. (2006). Whatever the weather: Media attitudes to reporting climate change. Retrieved from PANOS website: http://panos.org.uk/wp-content/files/2011/03/whatever_weathermjwnSt.pdf.
  30. Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of capitalism. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Herod, A. (2010). Scale. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  34. Kaldor, M. (2003a). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kaldor, M. (2003b). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karns, M. P., & Mingst, K. A. (2004). International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Keane, J. (2001). Global civil society? In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001 (pp. 23–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Martins, H. (1974). Time and theory in sociology (Chapter 12). In J. Rex (Ed.), Approaches to sociology (pp. 246–294). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  39. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  40. Paton, K., & Fairbairn-Dunlop, P. (2010). Listening to local voices: Tuvaluans respond to climate change. Local Environment, 15(7), 687–698.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.498809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pillay, K., & Maharaj, M. (2010). An overview of Web 2.0 social media as a tool for advocacy. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Scoring IT education goals in 2010’ of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, June 7–9, Pretoria. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoj_Maharaj/publication/266502528_An_Overview_of_Web_2.0_Social_Media_as_a_tool_for_advocacy/links/543bb95d0cf2d6698be31c45.pdf.
  42. Rantanen, T. (2007). The cosmopolitanization of news. Journalism Studies, 8(6), 843–861.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701556765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., & Naess, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 778–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73(4), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sassen, S. (2004). The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43.Google Scholar
  48. Sassen, S. (2007). Sociology of globalization. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Sassen, S. (2008). Neither global nor national: Novel assemblages of territory, authority and rights. Ethics and Global Politics, 1(1–2), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simmons, P. J. (1998). Learning to live with NGOs. Foreign Policy, 112, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, A. D. (1979). Nationalism in the twentieth century. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, N. (1990). Uneven development (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Söderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. M. (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  56. Volkmer, I. (2012). Deconstructing the “Methodological Paradox”: Comparative research between national centrality and networked spaces. In I. Volkmer (Ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 110–122). London: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  58. Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations