Abstract
What is design? Definitions range from design as a product or process of thinking, modelling or problem solving, to all-encompassing visions of design as the transformation of social environments. Some definitions of design stress the aspect of function, others the similarity with art. Even if we try to break down the definition to design objects in the sense of designed material artefacts such as chairs, books or buildings, defining their essential properties proves difficult. What is the special ingredient that makes an artefact a design object? Based on the philosophical method of conceptual analysis, the present chapter asserts that any definition of design objects necessarily includes their appearance. Since the creation of appearance and aesthetic experience is an essential task of design, the study of aesthetics should consider design among its paramount subjects. This argumentation leads to an astonishing conclusion for traditional philosophy: The philosophical divide between ontology and aesthetics is bridged when it comes to design objects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Cf. Goethe’s Faust (translation by George M. Priest)
- 2.
This is a reference to (Cross 2007)
- 3.
For a suggestion of how a philosophical approach to design could deepen our understanding, cf. (Vial 2015b).
- 4.
This is not only a problem of design theory, but of most fields of study, at least within the humanities and social sciences.
- 5.
- 6.
All citations from Behrisch and Brock (2015): Translation from the German by the present writer.
References
Alexander, C. (1971). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alloa, E. (2016). Produktiver Schein: Phänomenotechnik zwischen Ästhetik und Wissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 60(2), 169–182.
Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16–29.
Behrisch, S., & Brock, B. (2015). Schwarzer Humor. Das Magazin, 49, 24–26.
Böhme, G. (2013). Atmosphäre: Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4–23.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Burckhardt, L. (2012). Design ist unsichtbar: Entwurf, Gesellschaft & Pädagogik. Berlin: Martin Schmitz.
Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.
Fuller, R.B. (1955). Influences on my work. Reprinted in J. Krausse & C. Lichtenstein (2001) (Eds.), Your private sky: Discourse R. Buckminster Fuller (pp. 48–61). Baden: Lars Müller.
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.
Locke, J. (2012). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
Russell, B. (1998). The problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schneller, A. (2015). Design rhetoric: Studying the effects of designed objects. Nature and Culture, 10(3), 333–356.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The science of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The. M.I.T. Press.
Vial, S. (2015a). The effect of design: A phenomenological contribution to the quiddity of design presented in geometrical order. Art, 3(4), 4.1–4.6.
Vial, S. (2015b). Philosophy applied to design: A design research teaching method. Design Studies, 37, 59–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneller, A. (2018). Scratching the Surface: “Appearance” as a Bridging Concept between Design Ontology and Design Aesthetics. In: Vermaas, P., Vial, S. (eds) Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73301-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73302-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)