Skip to main content

Sustainable Aquaculture: Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Aquaculture

Abstract

One of the goals of the sustainable development is to minimize or eliminate the environmental externalities and target social and economic development. Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment (SEEA) deal with assessing the socio-economic and environmental issues that can potentially be a threat to the existing condition. SEEA also deals with developing a proper alternative or management techniques. As the world capture type of fishing is stagnant or declining, the growth of the aquaculture is inevitable as it fills the gap between declining natural production and increasing market demand. Aquaculture is the only viable way of raising the production of seafood and freshwater fish. Thus, the sustainable development of aquaculture industries has been the necessity. This chapter highlights the different socio-economic and environmental issues that aquaculture leads to and also presents the impact areas, mitigation and monitoring plans that can be adopted to ensure sustainability of the aquaculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Boom and bust cycle: It is a process of economic growth and contraction, which occurs frequently and is the key characteristic of capitalist economies. Boom phase of the growth creates numerous job opportunities while the bust phase of the cycle collapses these jobs.

  2. 2.

    Fishmeal, which is derived from wild capture is the processed meal for the aquaculture carnivorous fish. It is majorly processed from fresh wild captured small, bony/oily fish and a small fraction is processed from the other fish trimmings (or fish waste). These kind of captured fish and by-products are not suitable for direct human consumption.

References

  • Barg UC (1992) Guidelines for the promotion of environmental management of coastal aquaculture development. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 328. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulcombe D, Crute I, Davies B, Dunwell J, Gale M, Jones J, Toulmin C (2009) Reaping the benefits: science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. The Royal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burreson EM, Stokes NA, Friedman CS (2000) Increased virulence in an introduced pathogen: Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. J Aquat Anim Health 12(1):1–8. 10.1577/1548-8667(2000)0122.0.co;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush SR, Belton B, Hall D, Vandergeest P, Murray FJ, Ponte S, Oosterveer P, Islam MS, Mol APJ, Hatanaka M, Kruijssen F, Ha TTT, Little DC, Kusumawati R (2013) Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science 341(6150):1067–1068. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE (1992) Shrimp pond bottom soil and sediment management. In: Wyban J (ed) Proceedings of the special session on shrimp farming. Orlando, Florida, May 25–26 1992, pp 166–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron CJ, Costa-Pierce B (2013) Carrying capacity tools for use in the implementation of an ecosystems approach to aquaculture. In: Ross LG, Telfer TC, Falconer L, Soto D, Aguilar-Manjarrez J (eds) Site selection and carrying capacity for inland and coastal aquaculture, pp 87–101. FAO/Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Expert Workshop, 6–8 Dec 2010. Stirling, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. FAO fisheries and aquaculture proceedings no. 21. Rome, FAO. 282 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Diana JS, Keoleian GA, Lai Q (2011) Life cycle assessment of Chinese shrimp farming systems targeted for export and domestic sales. Environ Sci Technol 45(15):6531–6538. https://doi.org/10.1021/es104058z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change 19(2):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierberg FE, Kiattisimkul W (1996) Issues, impacts, and implications of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand. Environ Manage 20(5):649–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Justice Foundation (2014) Impossibly cheap: abuse and injustice in Bangladesh’s shrimp industry [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylFJDvHYnt8. Accessed on 19 June 2016

  • Erondu ES, Anyanwu PE (2005) Potential hazards and risks associated with the aquaculture industry. Afr J Biotech 4(13):1622–1627

    Google Scholar 

  • European Comission (2016) Facts and figures. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/facts-and-figures.html. Accessed on 14 June 2016

  • FAO (2012) The State of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2014a). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization FAO (2014b) FAO Regional Conference for Asia and the Pacific: sustainable intensification of aquaculture for food and nutritional security in the Asia-Pacific region. Information note, 32nd session, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 10–14 Mar 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) (1996) The contributions of science to integrated coastal management. In: GESAMP Reports and Studies, No. 61. FAO, Rome, 66 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/a-w1639e.pdf. Accessed on 12 June 2016

  • Hall SJ, Delaporte A, Phillips MJ, Beveridge M, O’Keefe M (2011) Blue frontiers: managing the environmental costs of aquaculture. The WorldFish Center, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe JMPK (1995) Report on a regional study and workshop on the environmental assessment and management of aquaculture development. FAO Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, April 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen Ø, Dempster T, Thorstad EB, Uglem I, Fredheim A (2010) Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: causes, consequences and prevention. Aquac Environ Interact 1(1):71–83. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanna Lovatt (2016) The Bangladesh shrimp farmers facing life on the edge. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/feb/17/the-bangladesh-shrimp-farmers-facing-life-on-the-edge. Accessed on 12 June 2016

  • Kabir SH (2013) Sea food export from Bangladesh and current status of traceability. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/6-%20%20Sea%20Food%20Export%20from%20Bangladesh-Kabir.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2016

  • Kuris AM, Culver CS (1999) An introduced sabellid polychaete pest infesting cultured abalones and its potential spread to other California gastropods. Invertebr Biol 118(4):391–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/3227008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link TV (2005) Murky waters: shrimp farming in Bangladesh [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlX7nkxAqWY. Accessed on 19 June 2016

  • Menasveta P, Fast A (1998) The evolution of shrimp culture and its impact on mangroves. INFOFISH Int 1(98):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Hindar K, Fleming IA, Goldburg R, Williams S, Volpe J, Whoriskey F, Eagle J, Kelso D, Mangel M (2005) Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience 55(5):427–437. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0427:FSATRO]2.0.CO;2

  • Neiland AE, Shaw SA, Bailly D (1991) The social and economic impact of aquaculture: a European review. Aquac Environ 16:469–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin RS (1989) Third-world aquaculture and the environment. NAGA 12(1):10–13. Retrieved from http://pubs.iclarm.net/Naga/na_3238.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2016

  • Rosenthal H (1992) Environmental impacts: negative and positive aspects in workshop, fish farm effluents and their control in EC countries. Congress Center Hamburg, 23–25, Nov 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipp G (2008) Is the use of fishmeal and fish oil in aquaculture diets sustainable? Technote no: 124. Northern Territory Government, Australia. https://dpir.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/233562/tn124.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2016

  • Senarath U, Visvanathan C (2001) Environmental issues in brackish water shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environ Manage 27(3):335–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subasinghe R (2006) State of world aquaculture 2006. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2007) World development report 2008: agriculture for development (no. E14 231). World Bank Group, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2013) Fish to 2030: prospects for fisheries and aquaculture. World Bank Report Number 83177-GLB. World Bank Group, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorstad EB, Fleming IA, McGinnity P, Soto D, Wennevik V, Whoriskey F (2008) Incidence and impacts of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in nature. NINA special report 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner GE (1988) Codes of practice and manual of procedures for consideration of introductions and transfers of marine and freshwater organisms. EIFAC/CECPI occasional paper no. 23. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2013) Sustainable fisheries and responsible aquaculture: a guide for USAID and partners. USAID, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite RI, Beveridge MA, Brummett RA, Castine SA, Chaiyawannakarn NU, Kaushik SA, Mungkung RA, Nawapakpilai SU, Phillips MI (2014) Improving productivity and environmental performance of aquaculture. Working paper, installment 5 of creating a sustainable food future. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2016) Overview. Retrieved from http://www.worldwildlife.org/industries/farmed-shrimp. Accessed on 12 June 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Visvanathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhari, B., Visvanathan, C. (2018). Sustainable Aquaculture: Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment. In: Hai, F., Visvanathan, C., Boopathy, R. (eds) Sustainable Aquaculture. Applied Environmental Science and Engineering for a Sustainable Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73257-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics