Advertisement

Smart Homes and Dwelling Machines: On Function, Ornament, and Cognition

  • Teemu Paavolainen
Chapter
Part of the Performance Philosophy book series (PPH)

Abstract

Thread 5 addresses domestic design and technology, from the dwelling machines of modernist functionalism to the smart homes of the present, as exemplified by Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye (1931) and Apple’s Home application (2016). In this technological and architectonic domain, the performative staples of efficiency, efficacy, and effectiveness are traced in projects of functional transparency, from the Corbusian ‘machine for living in’ to the ‘ubiquitous’ but more invisible technologies of late. Conversely, the theatrical resides in the dramatic, the aesthetic, the sensuous: in synoptic networks that help control and understand the technological meshwork, but also enable a distinctly antitechnological variant of the good old antitheatrical prejudice—beginning from the modernist distrust of ‘ornament’ in Le Corbusier’s time. The chapter concludes on ‘ecological’ notions of extended and enactive cognition that not only bear some affinity with theatricality and performativity, but also neatly define ‘textures of thought’ in which dwellings and inhabitants are equally interwoven.

References

  1. Aldrich, Francis K. 2003. Smart Homes: Past, Present and Future. In Harper 2003, 17–39.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Geoffrey H. 1989. Le Corbusier: An Analysis of Form. 2nd ed. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  3. Balme, Christopher B. 2007. Pacific Performances: Theatricality and Cross-Cultural Encounter in the South Seas. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benford, Steve, and Gabriella Giannachi. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benton, Tim. 2006. Building Utopia. In Modernism: Designing a New World, 1914–1939, ed. Christopher Wilk, 149–224. London: V&A Publications.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2007. The Villas of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret 1920–1930. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, Anne-Jorunn. 1994. A Gendered Socio-Technical Construction: The Smart House. In Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe, ed. Cynthia Cockburn and Ruža Fürst-Dilić, 165–180. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brecht, Bertolt. 2014. Brecht on Performance: Messingkauf and Modelbooks. Edited by Tom Kuhn, Steve Giles, and Marc Silberman. Translated by Charlotte Ryland, Romy Fursland, Steve Giles, Tom Kuhn, and John Willett. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers, Matthew, and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful Interweaving: Heterogeneity in the Theory and Design of Interactive Systems. In DIS 2004 Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 243–252. New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, Andy. 2003. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2004. Author’s Response. Metascience 13 (2): 169–181.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2010. Material Surrogacy and the Supernatural: Reflections on the Role of Artefacts in ‘Off-line’ Cognition. In The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind, ed. Lambros Malafouris and Colin Renfrew, 23–28. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2014. Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Colomina, Beatriz. 1992. The Split Wall: Domestic Voyerism. In Sexuality & Space, ed. Beatriz Colomina, 72–128. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  16. Colquhoun, Alan. 2002. Modern Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cupers, Kenny, ed. 2013. Use Matters: An Alternative History of Architecture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. de Heer, Jan. 2009. The Architectonic Colour: Polychromy in the Purist architecture of Le Corbusier. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. de Landa, Manuel. 1995. Homes: Meshwork or Hierarchy? Online. http://www.mediamatic.net/5914/en/homes-meshwork-or-hierarchy.
  20. ———. 1998. Meshworks, Hierarchies and Interfaces. In The Virtual Dimension: Architecture, Representation, and Crash Culture, ed. John Beckman, 279–281. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Online. http://www.t0.or.at/delanda/meshwork.htm.Google Scholar
  21. Dourish, Paul. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dourish, Paul, and Genevieve Bell. 2011. Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunne, Anthony. 2005. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Emmons, Paul, and Andreea Mihalache. 2013. Architectural Hand Books and the User Experience. In Cupers 2013, 35–50.Google Scholar
  25. Forty, Adrian. 2004. Words and Buildings. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  26. Frampton, Kenneth. 2001. Le Corbusier. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  27. Frederick, Christine. 1923. Household Engineering: Scientific Management in the Home. A Correspondence Course. Chicago: Home Economics Association. First Published 1915. https://archive.org/details/householdengineer00fredrich.
  28. Froese, Tom, and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo. 2011. The Enactive Approach: Theoretical Sketches from Cell to Society. Pragmatics & Cognition 19 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gans, Deborah. 2006. The Le Corbusier Guide. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gebhart, Andrew, and Megan Wollerton. 2016. Apple’s Home App Makes It Easy to Control Your Home from Your Phone: Finally. cnet.com, September 19. https://www.cnet.com/news/exploring-apples-home-for-homekit/.
  31. Gewirtz, David. 2015. Internet of Things: Sillier and Scarier and Coming Your Way. ZDNet, March 18. http://www.zdnet.com/article/that-internet-of-things-siller-and-scarier-and-coming-your-way/.
  32. Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First Published 1979.Google Scholar
  33. Gillespie, Diane. 1992. The Mind’s We: Contextualism in Cognitive Psychology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Greenfield, Adam. 2006. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  35. Grotowski, Jerzy. 1968. Towards a Poor Theatre. Holsterbro: Odin Teatrets Forlag.Google Scholar
  36. Harper, Richard, ed. 2003. Inside the Smart Home. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. ———, ed. 2010. Texture: Human Expression in the Age of Communications Overload. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2011. From Smart Home to Connected Home. In The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life, ed. Richard Harper, 3–18. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hartoonian, Gevork. 2006. Crisis of the Object: The Architecture of Theatricality. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, Jonathan. 2003. Actions of Architecture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Holt, Matthew. 2011. The Limits of Empathy: Utopianism, Absorption and Theatricality in Design. The Design Journal 14 (2): 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Honzl, Jindřich. 1976. Dynamics of the Sign in the Theater. In Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions, eds. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik, 74–93. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. First Published 1940.Google Scholar
  43. Hutchins, Edwin. 2010. Cognitive Ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science 2: 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Jacucci, Giulio. 2016. Interaction as Performance: Performative Strategies in Designing Interactive Experiences. In Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity, and Culture, ed. Ulrik Ekman et al., 350–363. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, Mark. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgement. Translated by W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett. First Published 1790.Google Scholar
  50. Kirsch, Karin. 1989. The Weissenhofsiedlung: Experimental Housing Built for the Deutscher Werkbund, Stuttgart, 1927. Translated by David Britt. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  51. Kirsh, David. 1995. The Intelligent Use of Space. Artifical Intelligence 73: 31–68. http://adrenaline.ucsd.edu/Kirsh/Articles/Space/intelligent_useof_space.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kiverstein, Julian, and Andy Clark. 2009. Introduction: Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or Many? Topoi 28 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laurel, Brenda. 1993. Computers as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  54. Le Corbusier. 1954. The Modulor: A Harmonious Measure to the Human Scale: Universally Applicable to Architecture and Mechanics. Translated by Peter De Francia and Anna Bostock. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1986. Towards a New Architecture. Translated by Frederick Etchells. New York: Dover. First Published 1931.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 1991. Precisions on the Present State of Architecture and City Planning. Translated by Edith Schreiber Aujame. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 2007. Toward an Architecture. Translated by John Goodman. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
  58. Loos, Adolf. 1998. Ornament and Crime: Selected Essays. Translated by Michael Mitchell. Riverside, CA: Ariadne.Google Scholar
  59. Lutterbie, John. 2011. Toward a General Theory of Acting: Cognitive Science and Performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Manovich, Lev. 1995. The Labor of Perception. Online. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/the-labor-of-perception.
  61. ———. 2007. Information as an Aesthetic Event. Online. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/information-as-an-aesthetic-event.
  62. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. McKenzie, Jon. 1994. Virtual Reality: Performance, Immersion, and the Thaw. TDR: The Drama Review 38 (4): 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ———. 2001. Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Menary, Richard, ed. 2010. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  66. Miller, Michael. 2015. The Internet of Things: How Smart TVs, Smart Cars, Smart Homes, and Smart Cities Are Changing the World. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  68. Paasonen, Susanna. 2005. Figures of Fantasy: Internet, Women, and Cyberdiscourse. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  69. Paavolainen, Teemu. 2012. Theatre/Ecology/Cognition: Theorizing Performer-Object Interaction in Grotowski, Kantor, and Meyerhold. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. ———. 2016. Textures of Thought: Theatricality, Performativity, and the Extended/Enactive Debate. In The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture, ed. Peter Garratt, 71–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Payne, Alina Alexandra. 2012. From Ornament to Object: Genealogies of Architectural Modernism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Pepper, Stephen C. 1970. Aesthetic Quality: A Contextualistic Theory of Beauty. Westport, CT: Greenwood. First Published 1937.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 1984. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First Published 1942.Google Scholar
  74. Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pine, B. Joseph, II, and James H. Gilmore. 1999. The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  76. Plant, Sadie. 1995. Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + The New Technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  77. Rowlands, Mark. 2009. Enactivism and the Extended Mind. Topoi 28 (1): 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salter, Chris. 2010. Entangled: Technology and the Transformation of Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Saltz, David Z. 1997. The Art of Interaction: Interactivity, Performativity, and Computers. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (2): 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. ———. 2001. Live Media: Interactive Technology and Theatre. Theatre Topics 11 (2): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sbriglio, Jacques. 2008. Le Corbusier: The Villa Savoye. Translated by Sarah Parsons. Paris: Fondation Le Corbusier/Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  82. Schechner, Richard. 2006. Performance Studies: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Semper, Gottfried. 1989. The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings. Translated by Harry Francis Mallgrave and Wolfgang Herrmann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Spence, Jocelyn. 2016. Performative Experience Design. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Spigel, Lynn. 2005. Designing the Smart House: Posthuman Domesticity and Conspicuous Production. European Journal of Cultural Studies 8: 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stewart, John, Olivier Gapenne, and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, eds. 2010. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  88. Stinga, Andrea. 2012. Villa Savoye: The Five Points of Architecture. Video. Online. https://vimeo.com/74918994.
  89. Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Tribble, Evelyn B. 2011. Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Turner, Cathy. 2015. Dramaturgy and Architecture: Theatre, Utopia and the Built Environment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  93. Weiser, Mark. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265 (3): 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. ———. 1994. Creating the Invisible Interface. In UIST ’94 Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1. Marina del Rey, CA: ACM Press. Online. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=192428.
  95. Wigley, Mark. 1995. White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wilk, Christopher, ed. 2006. Modernism: Designing a New World, 1914–1939. London: V&A Publications.Google Scholar
  97. Wilson, Robert A., and Andy Clark. 2009. How to Situate Cognition: Letting Nature Take Its Course. In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, ed. Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 55–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Zarrilli, Phillip B. 2013. Introduction. In Acting: Psychophysical Phenomenon and Process, ed. Phillip B. Zarrilli, Jerri Daboo, and Rebecca Loukes, 1–50. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teemu Paavolainen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations