Advertisement

Emptiness and Excess: The Cave, the Colonnade, and the Cube

  • Teemu Paavolainen
Chapter
Part of the Performance Philosophy book series (PPH)

Abstract

Thread 2 addresses the antitheatrical tradition through the emblematic Cave, Colonnade, and Cube of Platonic parable, Baroque architecture, and minimalist sculpture. As textbook cases of ‘antitheatrical prejudice’—of theatricality as a term of contempt—it is argued that all three exhibit an empirical and aspectual quality of theatricality, in which their historical opponents have perceived a distinct threat to performed norms of mimesis, measure, and modernism. If the theatricality that Plato attacks is one of ontological emptiness, then that of the Baroque is one of flamboyant gestural excess, exemplified by Bernini’s Colonnade in St Peter’s Square. Conversely, when the modernist art critic Michael Fried attacks the ‘theatricality’ of sculptural ‘literalism,’ it is to defend just the sort of caved absorption that Plato arguably opposed. Through its related dramaturgies of escape, from Plato’s Cave to Performance Studies, the antitheatrical prejudice is here presented as a specifically antitextural one.

References

  1. Ackerman, Alan, and Martin Puchner, eds. 2006. Against Theatre: Creative Destructions on the Modernist Stage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Auslander, Philip. 1997. Presence and Theatricality in the Discourse of Performance and the Visual Arts. In From Acting to Performance: Essays in Modernism and Postmodernism, 49–57. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Ed. J.O. Urmson. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Azéma, Marc, and Florent Rivère. 2012. Animation in Palaeolithic Art: A Pre-Echo of Cinema. http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/azema332/.
  5. Bal, Mieke. 2011. Baroque Matters. In Hills 2011, 183–202.Google Scholar
  6. Barish, Jonas. 1981. The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Battcock, Gregory, ed. 1968. Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  8. Baugh, Christopher. 2013. Baroque to Romantic Theatre. In The Cambridge Companion to Theatre History, ed. David Wiles and Christine Dymkowski, 33–54. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Borbein, Adolf H. 1996. Polykeitos. In Personal Styles in Greek Sculpture, ed. Olga Palagia and J.J. Pollit, 66–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bottoms, Stephen J. 2003. The Efficacy/Effeminacy Braid: Unpicking the Performance Studies/Theatre Studies Dichotomy. Theatre Topics 13 (2): 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buttimer, Anne. 1993. Geography and the Human Spirit. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, Marvin. 2002. The Resistance to Theatricality. SubStance 31 (2–3): 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Kerckhove, Derrick. 1982. Theatre as Information-Processing in Western Cultures. Modern Drama 25 (1): 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deleuze, Gilles. 2006. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Trans. Tom Conley. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Egginton, William. 2010. The Theater of Truth: The Ideology of (Neo)Baroque Aesthetics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Esterhammer, Angela. 2000. The Romantic Performative: Language and Action in British and German Romanticism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Féral, Josette, ed. 1982. Performance, or the Subversion of Theatricality. Special Section in Modern Drama 25 (1): 154–181.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer-Lichte, Erika, ed. 1995. Theatricality: A Key Concept in Theatre and Cultural Studies. Special Issue. Theatre Research International 20 (2): 85–118.Google Scholar
  20. Fried, Michael. 1965. Jackson Pollock. Artforum 4 (1): 14–17.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1987. Theories of Art After Minimalism and Pop. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture 1, ed. Hal Foster, 55–58. Seattle: Dia Art Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1998a. Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1998b. An Introduction to My Art Criticism. In Fried 1998a, 1–74.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1998c. Art and Objecthood. In Fried 1998a, 148–172.Google Scholar
  26. Fuchs, Elinor. 2006. Clown Shows: Anti-Theatricalist Theatricalism in Four Twentieth-Century Plays. In Ackerman and Puchner, 39–57.Google Scholar
  27. Gablik, Suzi. 1994. Minimalism. In Concepts of Modern Art: From Fauvism to Postmodernism, ed. Nikos Stangos, 244–255. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  28. Geraghty, Anthony. 2011. Nicholas Hawksmoor’s Drawing Technique of the 1690s and John Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In Hills 2011, 125–141.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First Published 1979.Google Scholar
  30. Gillgren, Peter, and Mårten Snickare, eds. 2012. Performativity and Performance in Baroque Rome. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Gobert, R. Darren. 2013. The Mind-Body Stage: Passion and Interaction in the Cartesian Theatre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harbison, Robert. 2000. Reflections on Baroque. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  33. Havelock, Eric A. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  34. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  35. Hersey, George L. 2000. Architecture and Geometry in the Age of the Baroque. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hibbard, Howard. 1965. Bernini. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Hills, Helen, ed. 2011a. Rethinking the Baroque. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. ——— 2011b. The Baroque: The Grit in the Oyster of Art History. In Hills 2011a, 11–36.Google Scholar
  39. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, Shannon. 2004. Professing Performance: Theatre in the Academy from Philology to Performativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Januszczak, Waldemar. 2009. Baroque! From St Peter’s to St Paul’s. BBC Four.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, Amelia. 1998. Body Art: Performing the Subject. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1999. Art History/Art Criticism: Performing Meaning. In Performing the Body/Performing the Text, ed. Amelia Jones and Andrew Stephenson, 36–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Judd, Donald. 1965. Specific Objects. Arts Yearbook 8: 74–82.Google Scholar
  46. Kaprow, Allan. 1966. Assemblage, Environments & Happenings. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
  47. Kaye, Nick. 1994. Postmodernism and Performance. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kitao, Timothy K. 1974. Circle and Oval in the Square of Saint Peter’s: Bernini’s Art of Planning. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Krauss, Rosalind. 1987. Theories of Art After Minimalism and Pop. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture 1, ed. Hal Foster, 59–64. Seattle: Dia Art Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Kwa, Chunglin. 2002. Romantic and Baroque Conceptions of Complex Wholes in the Sciences. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, ed. John Law and Annemarie Mol, 23–52. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  52. Linder, Mark. 2004. Nothing Less Than Literal: Architecture After Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. McEvilley, Thomas. 1986. Introduction. In O’Doherty 1986, 7–12.Google Scholar
  54. McGillivray, Glen. 2004. Theatricality: A Critical Genealogy. PhD Diss., University of Sydney. http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/1428.
  55. ———. 2008. Globing the Globe: September 11 and Theatrical Metaphor. Theory & Event 11 (4): 10–21.Google Scholar
  56. Melville, Stephen. 2007. ‘Art and Objecthood’: A Lecture. http://www.macba.cat/uploads/20080915/QP_15_Melville.pdf.
  57. Montelle, Yann-Pierre. 2009. Palaeoperformance: The Emergence of Theatricality as Social Practice. London: Seagull.Google Scholar
  58. Morris, Robert. 1968. Notes on Sculpture. In Battcock 1968, 222–235.Google Scholar
  59. Morrissey, Jake. 2005. The Genius in the Design: Bernini, Borromini, and the Rivalry That Transformed Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  60. Nellhaus, Tobin. 2010. Theatre, Communication, Critical Realism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Noë, Alva. 2002. Art as Enaction. Presented at the Art and Cognition Virtual Conference. https://www.scribd.com/document/51703258/Alva-Noe-Art-as-enaction.
  63. ———. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. O’Doherty, Brian. 1968. Minus Plato. In Battcock 1968, 251–255.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 1986. Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space. Expanded ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  66. Ong, Walter J. 2002. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London and New York: Routledge. First Published 1982.Google Scholar
  67. Paavolainen, Teemu. 2012. Theatre/Ecology/Cognition: Theorizing Performer-Object Interaction in Grotowski, Kantor, and Meyerhold. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paz, Octavio. 1988. Sor Juana or, The Traps of Faith. Trans. Margaret Sayers Peden. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  69. Pepper, Stephen C. 1970. Aesthetic Quality: A Contextualistic Theory of Beauty. Westport, CT: Greenwood. First Published 1937.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 1984. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First Published 1942.Google Scholar
  71. Plato. 1892. Sophist. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/sophist.html.
  72. ———. 1894. The Republic. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html.
  73. ———. 1969. The Republic. Trans. Paul Shorey. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0168.
  74. ———. 1993. Republic. Trans. Robin Waterfield. Oxford University Press, Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
  75. Postlewait, Thomas, and Tracy C. Davis. 2003. Introduction. In Theatricality, ed. Tracy C. Davis and Thomas Postlewait, 1–39. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Puchner, Martin. 2001. Modernism and Anti-theatricality: An Afterword. Modern Drama 44 (3): 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. ———. 2010. The Drama of Ideas: Platonic Provocations in Theater and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rachlin, Howard. 2014. The Escape of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  80. Ridout, Nicholas. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals, and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rose, Barbara. 1968. ABC Art. In Battcock 1968, 274–97.Google Scholar
  82. Schama, Simon. 2006. Bernini. Power of Art, Episode 2. BBC Two.Google Scholar
  83. Scribner, Charles, III. 1991. Gianlorenzo Bernini. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
  84. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Andrew Parker, eds. 1995. Performativity and Performance. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Senseney, John R. 2011. The Art of Building in the Classical World: Vision, Craftsmanship and Linear Perspective in Greek and Roman Architecture. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shershow, Scott Cutler. 1995. Puppets and “Popular” Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Snickare, Mårten. 2012. How to Do Things with the Piazza San Pietro: Performativity and Baroque Architecture. In Gillgren and Snickare 2012, 65–83.Google Scholar
  88. Spivey, Nigel. 1996. Understanding Greek Sculpture: Ancient Meanings, Modern Readings. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  89. States, Bert O. 1996. Performance as Metaphor. Theatre Journal 48 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vokes, Allanah. 2013. The Animated Theories of Michael Fried. YouTube Video, Posted 18 November. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f-yny8tVyY.
  91. Warwick, Genevieve. 2012. Bernini: Art as Theatre. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Weber, Samuel. 2004. Theatricality as Medium. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wiles, David. 2003. A Short History of Western Performance Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Williams, Kirk. 2006. Anti-Theatricality and the Limits of Naturalism. In Ackerman and Puchner 2006, 95–111.Google Scholar
  95. Wölfflin, Heinrich. 1964. Renaissance and Baroque. Trans. Kathrin Simon. London: Fontana/Collins. First Published 1888.Google Scholar
  96. Zunshine, Lisa. 2010. Theory of Mind and Michael Fried’s Absorption and Theatricality: Notes Toward Cognitive Historicism. In Toward a Cognitive Theory of Narrative Acts, ed. Frederick Luis Aldama, 179–203. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teemu Paavolainen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations