Advertisement

20 Years of Co-creation Using Case Based Learning

An Integrated Approach for Teaching Innovation and Research in Product Generation Engineering
  • Albert Albers
  • Nikola Bursac
  • Jonas Heimicke
  • Benjamin Walter
  • Nicolas Reiß
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)

Abstract

The teaching program IP - Integrated Product Development has been implemented annually with great success for 20 years, which means that this format has gained a high level of acceptance among companies from a wide range of industries. The participating students acquire professional skills in the area of PGE - Product Generation Engineering through the experience of the real development project and by applying activities and methods of product development, combined with a lecture that deals with the most recent cases from the business world. With the aim of bringing the co-creation formats to further student target groups with diverse needs, the format IP was analyzed and a general valid co-creation approach for case-based learning, was characterized by relevant success factors. Based on this, it was possible to transfer the success factors from IP contextual into the breadth (reaching a high number of students) and into the depth (gain of research competences) by means of two further formats.

Keywords

Professional skills Case-based learning Co-creation 

References

  1. 1.
    Albers, A., Burkardt, N.: Experiences with the new educational model “Integrated Product Development” at the University of Karlsruhe (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albers, A., Lohmeyer, Q., Alink, T.: On the importance of handling objectives in design education project work. In: International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Trondheim, Norway (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albers, A., Burkardt, N., Deigendesch, T.: Vermittlung von Schlüsselqualifikationen am Beispiel des Karlsruher Lehrmodells für Produktentwicklung KaLeP. Schlüsselqualifikationen für Studium, Beruf und Gesellschaft. Technische Universitäten im Kontext der Kompetenzdiskussion, pp. 511–520 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albers, A., Bursac, N., Wintergerst, E.: Product generation development – importance and challenges from a design research perspective. In: New Developments, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, pp. 16–21 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groth, A.: Führungsstark im Wandel: Change Leadership für das mittlere Management. Campus Verlag (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matthiesen, S., Drechsler, S., Bruchmüller, T.: Universitäre Ausbildung zum Konstrukteur im Kontext des industriellen Wandels (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Albers, A., Burkardt, N., Düser, T.: Competence-profile oriented education with the Karlsruhe Education Model for Product Development (KaLeP). World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ. (WTE&TE) 5, 271–274 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breitschuh, J., Albers, A.: Teaching and testing in mechanical engineering. In: Vocational Education and Training: Research and Practice: Competence in Higher Education and the Working Environemnt, pp. 1–14. Peter Lang (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tremp, P., Hildbrand, T. (eds.): Forschungsorientiertes Studium – universitäre Lehre: Das «Zürcher Framework» zur Verknüpfung von Lehre und Forschung. Einführung in die Studiengangentwicklung (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walter, B., Albers, A., Haupt, F., Bursac, N.: Produktentwicklung im virtuellen Ideenlabor – Konzipierung und Implementierung eines Live-Lab, pp. 283–295Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Design Factory Global Network: Design Factory Global Network. http://dfgn.org/. Accessed 14 June 2017
  13. 13.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 18(3), 5–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: The co-creation connection. Strategy Bus. 50–60 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., Johansson, N.: Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 19(4), 474–491 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ehrlenspiel, K., Meerkamm, H.: Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, 5th edn. Carl Hanser Verlag, München (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Albers, A., Klingler, S., Ebel, B.: Modelling systems of objectives in engineering design practice. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2013. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albers, A., Reiß, N., Bursac, N., Richter, T.: iPeM – integrated product engineering model in context of product generation engineering. Procedia CIRP 50, 100–105 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ropohl, G. (ed.): Systemtechnik - Grundlagen und Anwendung: Einleitung in die Systemtechnik. Carl Hanser Verlag, München Wien (1975)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albers, A., Bursac, N., Walter, B., Hahn, C., Schröder, J.: ProVIL – Produktentwicklung im virtuellen Ideenlabor. In: Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben – Methoden und Werkzeuge in Produktentwicklung und Design 2016 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Albers
    • 1
  • Nikola Bursac
    • 1
  • Jonas Heimicke
    • 1
  • Benjamin Walter
    • 1
  • Nicolas Reiß
    • 1
  1. 1.IPEK Institute of Product EngineeringKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations