An Activity Tracking Infrastructure for Embedded Open Educational Labs Supporting the Needs of Lab Owners and Students

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)

Abstract

Remote labs are interactive Open Educational Resources, where user’s action generates a wealth of data belonging to two categories: interaction data resulting from the use of the client web app, and experimental data resulting from performing the experiment. Many entities are interested in deriving insights from the user’s generated data: students, teachers, institutions, and lab providers. In this work we consider to needs of students and lab owners as stakeholders. Through questionnaires we find out that students want to save and retrieve their experimental results and have awareness about their progress relative to others, while lab owners want to understand how their labs are used in order to provide better services and advertise their labs. Given that students and lab owners have different interests in the data, we address their differing needs by proposing an architecture for an activity tracking infrastructure, an accompanying vocabulary to formalize the tracks, and present a use case.

Keywords

Remote laboratories Open educational labs Activity tracking xAPI 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partially funded by the European Union in the context of the Go-Lab Integrated Project and the Next-Lab Innovation Action. The latter has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 731685. This publication reflects only the author’s view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The work was also co-funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation in the framework of its SCOPES (Scientific co-operation between Eastern Europe and Switzerland) programme under Grant Agreement No IZ74Z0-160454. This paper is one of the contributions of the task carried on in the framework the IEEE-SA P1876TM Working Group on “Standard for Networked Smart Learning Objects for Online Laboratories” (https://ieee-sa.imeetcentral.com/1876public/).

References

  1. 1.
    Dillenbourg, P., Zufferey, G., Alavi, H., Jermann, P., Do-Lenh, S., Bonnard, Q., Cuendet, S., Kaplan, F.: Classroom orchestration: the third circle of usability. In: CSCL2011 Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 510–517 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Downes, A., Shahrazad, A., Smith, R.: Sharing between LRSs: a collaborative experiment in practical interoperability (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillet, D., De Jong, T., Sotirou, S., Salzmann, C.: Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for stem education at school. In: 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 769–773. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halimi, W., Salzmann, C., Gillet, D.: The Mach-Zehnder interferometer: a smart remote experiment based on a software template. In: 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), pp. 287–292. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halimi, W., Salzmann, C., Gillet, D.: Managing privacy in activity tracking for remote labs. In: 7th Work Engineering Education Forum (WEEF). Under review (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halimi, W., Salzmann, C., Gillet, D., Saliah-Hassane, H.: Standardization layers for remote laboratories as services and open educational resources. In: International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV). Springer (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halimi, W., Salzmann, C., Jamkojian, H., Gillet, D.: Enabling the automatic generation of user interfaces for remote laboratories. In: International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV). Springer (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hecking, T., Manske, S., Bollen, L., Govaerts, S., Vozniuk, A., Hoppe, H.U.: A flexible and extendable learning analytics infrastructure. In: International Conference on Web-Based Learning, pp. 123–132. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orduna, P., Almeida, A., López-de Ipina, D., Garcia-Zubia, J.: Learning analytics on federated remote laboratories: tips and techniques. In: 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 299–305. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Govaerts, S., Halimi, W., Holzer, A., Salzmann, C., Vozniuk, A., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., Gillet, D.: Rich open educational resources for personal and inquiry learning: agile creation, sharing and reuse in educational social media platforms. In: 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salzmann, C., Govaerts, S., Halimi, W., Gillet, D.: The smart device specification for remote labs. In: 2015 12th international conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, pp. 199–208. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    TinCan/xAPI: Recipes: How it works. http://tincanapi.com/recipeshow-it-works/
  13. 13.
    TinCan/xAPI: Statement design. http://experienceapi.com/statement-design/
  14. 14.
    Vozniuk, A.: Enhancing Social Media Platforms for Educational and Humanitarian Knowledge Sharing: Analytics, Privacy, Discovery, and Delivery Aspects. Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vozniuk, A., Govaerts, S., Bollen, L., Manske, S., Hecking, T., Gillet, D.: AngeLA: putting the teacher in control of student privacy in the online classroom. In: 2014 Proceedings of Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wissam Halimi
    • 1
  • Christophe Salzmann
    • 2
  • Denis Gillet
    • 1
  1. 1.REACTEPFLLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Automatic Control LaboratoryEPFLLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations