Advertisement

Conceptualising Design of Learning Management Systems to Address Institutional Realities

  • Gerald Gwamba
  • Godfrey Mayende
  • Ghislain Maurice Norbert Isabwe
  • Paul Birevu Muyinda
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)

Abstract

There is growing interest in the use of E-Learning in higher educational institutions. However, studies have shown mismatches between Learning Management System (LMS) design and the general institutional context in developing countries. In this paper, we assess the design and implementation requirements for Makerere University LMS against the overall institution context. This research follows a qualitative method (interviews) and uses case study. We employ the design reality gap model to investigate the design requirements of the LMS against current institutional realities. A design reality gap of 46 was obtained implying ad-hoc measures need to be put in place otherwise the failure/stagnation of LMS is eminent. The study concludes with the need to identify hybrid approaches to LMS contextualization including use of tactical plus Strategic Information system plan (SISP), selecting/building hybrid staff and blended learning.

Keywords

e-Learning Learning Management Systems Design reality gap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the DELP project which is funded by NORAD. Special appreciation to the University of Agder and Makerere University, who are in research partnership, for their support.

References

  1. Albert, S., Mercedes, G.-S.: The role of information and communication technologies in improving teaching and learning processes in primary and secondary schools. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 26(8), 207–220 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.529108 Google Scholar
  2. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., Oliveira, T.: An e-learning theoretical framework. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(1), 292–307 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Christian, D., François, O.: Developing countries in the e-learning era. Fundamentals of educational planning 096 (2013). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002180/218002E.pdf
  4. Heeks, R.: Information systems and developing countries: failure, success, and local improvisations. Inf. Soc. 18(2), 101–112 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heeks, R.: Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? In: Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis, vol. 14, p. 4 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  6. Heeks, R.: Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. SAGE, London (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Kasim, N.N.M., Khalid, F.: Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: a systematic review. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 11(6), 55–61 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
  8. Kituyi, G., Tusubira, I.: A framework for the integration of e-learning in higher education institutions in developing countries. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Inf. Commun. Technol. 9(2), 19–36 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. Mayende, G., Isabwe, G.M.N., Muyinda, P.B., Prinz, A.: Peer assessment based assignment to enhance interactions in online learning groups. In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 20–24 September 2015, Florence, Italy (2015a)Google Scholar
  10. Mayende, G., Muyinda, P.B., Prinz, A., Isabwe, G.M.N., Nampijja, D.: Online learning needs assessment in Uganda. In: Digital Media, Tools, and Approaches in Teaching and Their Added Value. Waxmann Publishers (2015b)Google Scholar
  11. Mayende, G., Prinz, A., Isabwe, G.M.N., Muyinda, P.B.: Learning groups for MOOCs: lessons for online learning in higher education. In: Paper Presented at the 19th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2016), 21–23 September, Clayton Hotel, Belfast, UK (2016)Google Scholar
  12. Mayoka, K., Kyeyune, R.: An analysis of e-learning information system adoption in Ugandan Universities: case of Makerere University business school. Inf. Technol. Res. J. 2(1), 1–7 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. Munene, S.: Application of the Design – Reality Gap Model to Enhance High Availability of Systems for Health Care Providers in Nairobi, Kenya. University of Nairobi (2015)Google Scholar
  14. Opati, O.D.: The Use of ICT in Teaching and Learning at Makerere University: The Case of College of Education and External Studies. University of Oslo, 102, 37 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alozie, N., Ferguson, R., Fitzgerald, E., Gaved, M., Yarnall, L.: Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5. The Open University (2016). www.open.ac.uk/innovating
  16. Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., Marsden, G.: Issues of adoption: have e-learning management systems fulfilled their potential in developing countries? p. 236 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. Tabaire, B., Okao, J.: Reviving Makerere University to a Leading Institution for Academic Excellence in Africa Synthesis Report of the Proceedings of the 3rd State of the Nation Platform (2010). http://www.acode-u.org/Files/Publications/PDS_8.pdf
  18. Torrente, J., Moreno-ger, P., Martínez-ortiz, I., Fernandez-manjon, B.: Integration and deployment of educational games in e-learning environments: the learning object model meets educational gaming e-learning and videogames. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12, 359–371 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Gwamba
    • 1
  • Godfrey Mayende
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ghislain Maurice Norbert Isabwe
    • 2
  • Paul Birevu Muyinda
    • 3
  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of AgderGrimstadNorway
  3. 3.Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations