Advertisement

Engineering Pedagogy Terminology

  • Tatiana Y. Polyakova
  • Viacheslav M. Prikhodko
  • Andrey N. Rementsov
  • Elizaveta A. Bogacheva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)

Abstract

English has become the main working language of IGIP, which contributed greatly to the dissemination of Engineering Pedagogy ideas all over the world. But at the same time, it has caused some problems with proper understanding and usage of Engineering Pedagogy terminology. In order to overcome these difficulties, the authors suggest compiling “IGIP Multilingual Glossary”. For that purpose we propose to use the approach already applied in English-Russian and Russian-English Learners’ Concise Terminology Dictionary “Engineering Pedagogy” that has been worked out in Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI). It is intended for university educators who teach technical disciplines in English, as well as for post graduate students who are trained for pedagogical activities. The paper describes the lexicographic concept, similarities and differences of the structure and contents of the two dictionaries.

Keywords

Engineering pedagogy Terms Glossary Concise terminology dictionary 

References

  1. 1.
    Prikhodko, V.M., Polyakova, T.Y.: IGIP: International Society for Engineering Education: Past, Present, Future. Tekhpoligraftsentr Publishing, Moscow, p. 143 (2015). Приходько ВМ, Полякова ТЮ, (2015) IGIP. Международное общество по инженерной педагогике: прошлое, настоящее и будущее: монография. Техполиграфцентр, Москва, с. 143Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FSES HE training program in the field of construction, p. 15 (2014). 08.04.01, Master’s degree. ФГОС ВО по направлению подготовки (2014) 08.04.01 Строительство (Уровень магистратуры), с. 15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dictionary.com: Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com http://www.dictionary.com/browse/glossary
  4. 4.
    Sager, J.C.: Terminology and the Technical Dictionary. Niemeyer, Tübingen, p. 326 (1984). Hartmann, R.R.K. (ed.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azimov, E.G., Schukin, A.N.: Glossary of Methodological Terms, p. 472. Zlatoust Publishing, St. Petersburg (1999). Азимов ЭГ, Щукин АН, (1999) Словарь методических терминов. Златоуст, С.-Петербург, с. 472Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yartseva, V.N. (ed.): Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow, p. 684 (1990). Ярцева ВН, (Гл. ред.), (1990) Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Советская энциклопедия, Москва, с. 684Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polyakova, T.Y.: Terminology as a basis for the development of foreign language communicative competence of engineers. Bulletin of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin, pp. 31–34 (2012). Полякова ТЮ, (2012) Терминология как основа формирования профессиональной иноязычной коммуникативной компетенции инженера. Вестник ФГОУ ВПО МГАУ им. В.П.Горячкина, стр. 31–34Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pozdnyakova, S.Y.: Cognitive approach to selecting and arranging of concise terminology dictionary of technical military aircraft terminology (German language, non-language HEI). Irkutsk, p. 217 (2005). Позднякова СЮ, (2005) Когнитивный подход к отбору и организации учебного словаря-минимума узкоспециальных военно-авиационных терминов (немецкий язык, неязыковой вуз). Иркутск, с. 217Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Y. Polyakova
    • 1
  • Viacheslav M. Prikhodko
    • 1
  • Andrey N. Rementsov
    • 1
  • Elizaveta A. Bogacheva
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations