Continuous Assessment in Computing and Engineering Education for Improved Students’ Engagement and Enhanced Learning

  • James Uhomoibhi
  • Margaret Ross
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)


The aim of this paper is to discuss the approach undertaken for a number of years at two different universities, by the use of continuous assessment, to require as well as to encourage student motivation and improve learning throughout the units. The additional aim was to improve attendance that normally leads to better results for the students, which was achieved, at least partially, on the three study units considered in this paper. There is a need also to reduce the “strain” on the students as they approach the period of the majority of multiple assessments, often all at the end of the semester or the year, each of these being critical to the students passing the particular units.


Continuous assessment Student engagement Enhanced learning Motivated learning Computing and engineering education 


  1. 1.
    Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, R., Nicol, D., Ross, D., Smith, B.: Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. Higher Education Academy, UK (2004). Accessed 7 July 2017
  2. 2.
    Boud, D.: Implementing Student Self-Assessment. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, Sydney (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boud, D.: Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Stud. Contin. Educ. 22(2), 151–167 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuunila, R., Pulkkinen, M.: Effect of continuous assessment on learning outcomes on two chemical engineering courses: case study. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 40(6), 671–682 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowan, J.: Assessment for learning – giving timely and effective feedback. Exchange 4, 21–22 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rust, C.: The impact of assessment on student learning – how can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices. Act. Learn. High Educ. 3(2), 145–158 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Race, P.: A Briefing on Self, Peer and Group Assessment. LTSN Generic Centre, York (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harlen, W., Crick, R.D.: Testing and motivation for learning. Assess. Educ. 10(2), 169–207 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Higgins, R., Hartley, P., Skelton, A.: Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teach. High. Educ. 6(2), 269–274 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowntree, D.: Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? Kogan Page, London (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marton, F., Säljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 46, 115–127 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trotter, E.: Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 31(5), 505–521 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lines, D., Gammie, E.: Assessment methods report. Education Committee of the International Federation of Accountants. Accessed 7 July 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science and Information TechnologyIgbinedion UniversityOkadaNigeria
  2. 2.Faculty of Computing and EngineeringUlster UniversityNewtownabbeyNorthern Ireland, UK
  3. 3.Software Quality, School of Media Arts and TechnologySouthampton Solent UniversitySouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations