Advertisement

Professors’ Competences Through the Perspective of STEM Students

  • Sofia Antera
  • Dragana Manasova
  • Sonja Mihajlov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)

Abstract

Tertiary education institutions educate a great number of individuals of all ages every year with the aim to assist them in developing a set of skills, knowledge, competences and attitudes. The overall aim of the education process is dual: employment and contribution to society. Actors with a direct impact in this process are the professors, teachers with various roles, lecturers or heads of laboratories, supervisors or examiners.

While teachers in all levels of formal education are trained in specialised institutions and acquire formal teaching qualification, higher education professors lack such education in most cases. Consequently, the question raised is what competences a university professor should have in order to reach a quality teaching practice. In modern times, these competences are not limited to teaching, since professors perform multiple roles. Interpersonal competences, designing and implementing the learning process as well as innovation are also in demand.

This study will reflect how students in European STEM education perceive professors’ competences within the given framework, based on their university, field of study and degree. The conclusion is reached on which competences are of more importance and which should be reinforced in order to improve the quality of transmitting the knowledge in higher educational institutions.

Keywords

STEM Professor competences Student perception 

References

  1. 1.
    Postareff, L., Lyndblom-Ylanne, S., Nevgi, A.: The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teach. Teacher Educ. 23(5), 557–571 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brownell, S., Tanner, K.: Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 11, 339–346 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gougoulakis, P.: Educating scientists philosophy and practice of University Pedagogy. Academia 2017(8), 35–75 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lopez, D., Perez-Poch, A.: Detecting which teaching competences should be reinforced in an engineering lecturer training program. In: 44-th SEFI Conference, 12–15 September 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohan, A., Merle, D., Jackson, C., Lannin, J., Nair, S.: Professional skills in the engineering curriculum. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53(4), 562–571 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BEST: Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning & Class and Course Organisation. BEST Event on Education (EoE Ankara) (2015). https://issuu.com/bestorg/docs/eoe_ankara_final_report
  7. 7.
    BEST: Teach me to Teach you. BEST Event on Education (EoE Copenhagen) (2016). https://issuu.com/bestorg/docs/eoe-copenhagen
  8. 8.
    BEST: Teaching with Technology. BEST Event on Education (EoE Bratislava) (2015).https://issuu.com/bestorg/docs/baco_bratislava
  9. 9.
    Carreras Barnés, J.: El concepto de competencia y el diseño de planes de estudio a partir de perfiles competenciales. Dos cuestiones que hay que aclarar en el marco de las EEES. In El Debate sobre las competencias a la enseñanza universitaria, pp. 8–25. ICE UB, Barcelona (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreno-Murcia, J., Silveira Torregrosa, Y., Belando Pedreño, N.: Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. evaluation of teaching competencies in the university. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 4(1), 54–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., Hachfeld, A.: Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(3), 805–820 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., Stringfellow, E.: Typology of knowledge, skills and competences. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzales, J., Wagenaar, R.: Tuning educational structures in europe: Final report Phase I. University of Duesto & University of Groningen. http://www.relint.deusto.es/TUNINGProject/doc_tuning_phase1.asp. Accessed 31 July 2011
  14. 14.
    White, R.W.: Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol. Rev. 66, 297–333 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chomsky, N.: Rules and representations. Behav. Brain Sci. 3, 1–61 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shukla, S.: Teaching competency, professional commitment and job satisfaction-a study of primary school teachers. IOSR J. Res. Method Educ. (IOSRJRME) 4(3), 44–64 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    BEST: Survey Report - Professors’ Competences Through the Perspective of STEM Students (2017). https://issuu.com/bestorg/docs/stem-prof-competences-survey-report

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Antera
    • 1
  • Dragana Manasova
    • 2
  • Sonja Mihajlov
    • 3
  1. 1.Board of European Students of Technology (BEST)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Board of European Students of Technology (BEST)University Ss. Cyril and MethodiusSkopjeMacedonia
  3. 3.Board of European Students of Technology (BEST)University of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations