Training in Research on Cognitive Control Systems

  • Mykhailo PoliakovEmail author
  • Sergii Morshchavka
  • Oksana Lozovenko
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 716)


In the coming decades, a new round of scientific and technological revolution is expected in the world. A person will be surrounded by artificial intellectual systems based on knowledge — cognitive systems. The existing education system is focused on giving knowledge about previous generations of intelligent systems — IoT, CPS, and should be transformed. The required amount of knowledge can no longer be transferred to a trained specialist within the framework of existing teaching technologies. Therefore, skills of using, extracting and transforming knowledge become the basis of promising technologies of continuous self-education. To determine a direction of studying cognitive control systems, a model of a structure of such system is proposed, based on control levels. Each level of this model corresponds to procedures for transforming forms of knowledge that need to be studied by a future engineer. To favour the development of students’ self-education skills, it is suggested to sharply increase the amount of research assignments in the practice of teaching almost all technical curricula studied at universities. Examples of such tasks in physics, electrical engineering and other disciplines are given. Some of these examples are about “black box” objects; another need the application of a non-standard approach to ADC. Besides, a way of using ternary logic and logical inference to assess the quality of knowledge obtained by the cognitive control system is considered.


Cognitive control systems Models of cognitive control systems Research assignments Engineering education 



This work was supported in part by the European Commission within the program “Tempus” “DesIRE — Development of Embedded System Courses with implementation of Innovative Virtual approaches for integration of Research, Education and Production in UA, GE, AM”, Grant No. 544091-TEMPUS-1-2013-1-BE-TEMPUS-JPCR as well as “Union Internet of Things: Emerging Curriculum for Industry and Human Application ALIOT”, Grand No. 573818-EPP-1-2016-1-UK-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP.


  1. 1.
    Automation and Informatization of Scientific Research.
  2. 2.
    Berry, F.C., DiPiazza, P.S., Sauer, S.L.: The future of electrical and computer engineering education. IEEE Trans. Educ. 46(4), 467–476 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, T.Y., Poon, P.-L.: Experience with teaching black-box testing in a computer science/software engineering curriculum. IEEE Trans. Educ. 47(1), 42–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clocksin, W.: 1955-programming in Prolog: using the ISO standard. In: Clocksin, W.F., Vtllish, C.S. (eds.) 5th edn. p. cm. Includes Bibliographical References and Index. Springer (2003). 299 pGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frank, M.: Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioural competences of engineers with a high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Syst. Eng. 9(2), 91–103 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hennig, M., Mertsching, B., Hilkenmeier, F.: Situated mathematics teaching within electrical engineering courses. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 40(6), 683–701 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norhana, A., et al.: Lateral thinking through black box experiment among engineering Students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 60, 14–20 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olsson, G., Piani, D.: Cifrovye sistemy avtomatizacii i upravleniya [Digital Automation Systems and Control]. Nevsky Dialect Publ., Saint Petersburg (2001). 557 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Onderová, L.: Physics: a black box? Sci. Sch. Issue 12, 40–43 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poliakov, M.A.: Set-theoretical models of functional structures of systems of cognitive control. Syst. technol. 3(110), 16–23 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poliakov, M.: Fuzzy regulator of cooling of power oil transformer on the basis of prediction of change of disturbing factors. Electr. Eng. Electromechanics 3, 47–50 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poliakov, M., Henke, K., Wuttke, H.D.: The augmented functionality of the physical models of objects of study for remote laboratories. In: REV2017 – 14th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, 15–17 March 2017, Columbia University, New York, USA, pp. 148–157 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rowley, J.: The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J. Inf. Commun. Sci. 33(2), 163–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rugarcia, A., Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E.: The future of engineering education. Part 1. A vision for a new century. Chem. Eng. Educ. 34(1), 16–25 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwab, K.: The fourth industrial revolution: what it means and how to respond. Foreign Affairs (2015).
  16. 16.
    Shuman, L.J., et al.: The future of engineering education. In: 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, R.N., Craig, K.C., Theroux, P.: Development of a multidisciplinary core engineering experience for first-year students. In: 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mykhailo Poliakov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sergii Morshchavka
    • 1
  • Oksana Lozovenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Zaporizhzhya National Technical UniversityZaporizhzhyaUkraine

Personalised recommendations