Skip to main content

Conceptual Modelling: Common Students’ Mistakes in Visual Representation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 716))

Abstract

Knowledge based systems’ design requires the developer’s advanced analytical skills. The efficient development of those skills within university courses needs a deep understanding of main pitfalls and drawbacks, which students make during their analytical work in form of visual modeling. Thus, it was necessary to hold an analysis of 5-th year students’ learning exercises within courses of “Intelligent systems” and “Knowledge engineering” in Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University. The analysis shows that both lack of system thinking skills and methodological mistakes in course design cause the errors that are discussed in the paper.

The research was partially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant N17-07-00228).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gavrilova, T.: Knowledge engineering for non-engineers. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of IFIP 6th International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing IIP, pp. 225–234. Springer, Manchester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buzan, T., Buzan, B., Harrison, J.: The Mind Map Book: Unlock Your Creativity, Boost Your Memory, Change Your Life. Pearson BBC Active, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Minsky, M.: Frame-system theory. In: Johnson-Laird, P.N., Wason, P.C. (eds.) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, pp. 355–376. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Novak, J.D.: Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 27(10), 937–949 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kudryavtsev, D., Gavrilova, T.: From anarchy to system: a novel classification of visual knowledge codification techniques. Knowl. Process Manag. 24(1), 3–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gavrilova, T., Puuronen, S.: Ontological engineering for student research. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Second Conference on Cognitive Science, St. Petersburg, vol. 2, pp. 554–556 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gavrilova, T., Leshcheva, I., Strakhovich, E.: Gestalt principles of creating learning business ontologies for knowledge codification. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 13, 218–228 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koznov, D.V., Romanovsky, K.Y.: DocLine: a method for software product lines documentation development. Prog. Comput. Softw. 34(4), 216–224 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Koznov, D., Larchik, E., Pliskin, M., Artamonov, N.: Mind maps merging in collaborative work. Prog. Comput. Softw. 37(6), 315–321 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buzan, T., Griffiths, C., Harrison, J.: Mind Maps for Business Revolutionise your business thinking and practice (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheikhtaheri, A., Sadoughi, F., Dehaghi, Z.H.: Developing and using expert systems and neural networks in medicine: a review on benefits and challenges. J. Med. Syst. 38(9), 110 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Novak, J.D.: Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instr. Sci. 19, 29–52 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ausubel, D.P.: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kinchin, I.M., Hay, D.B., Adams, A.: How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educ. Res. 42(1), 43–57 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dyachenko, O., Zagorulko, Y.: A collaborative development of ontology-based knowledge bases. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web, pp. 219–228. Springer, September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cañas, A.J., Hill, G., Lott, J.: Support for constructing knowledge models in CmapTools. Technical report IHMC. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gavrilova, T., Kudryavtsev, D., Leshcheva, I., Pavlov, Y.: On a method of visual models classification. Bus.-Inform. J. 26(4), 32–44 (2013). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, T.K.: CAS, the book of professional standards for higher education 2003. Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kozma, R.B.: Constructing knowledge with learning tool. In: Kommers, P.A.M., Jonassen, D.H., Mayes, J.T., Ferreira, A. (eds.) Cognitive Tools for Learning. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol. 81. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mikulescky, L.: Development of Interactive Computer Programs to Help Students Transfer Basic Skills to College Level Science and Behavioral Sciences Courses. Indiana University, Bloominglon (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schlenker, D., Abegg, G.: Scoring student-generated concept maps in introductory college Chemistry. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eppler, M.J.: A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Inf. Vis. 5(3), 202–210 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldsmith, T.E., Johnson, P.J., Acton, W.H.: Assessing structural knowledge. J. Educ. Psychol. 83, 88–96 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Novak, J.D.: Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vasiliev, V., Kozlov, F., Mouromtsev, D., Stafeev, S., Parkhimovich, O.: ECOLE: an ontology-based open online course platform. In: Open Data for Education, pp. 41–66. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim Onufriev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gavrilova, T., Onufriev, V. (2018). Conceptual Modelling: Common Students’ Mistakes in Visual Representation. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. ICL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 716. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73203-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73204-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics