Advertisement

Transition Effect on Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction on Compressor Blade

  • Ryszard Szwaba
  • Piotr Doerffer
  • Piotr Kaczynski
Conference paper

Abstract

Intensive research on the laminar flow is carried out nowadays. The main objective is to keep the laminar boundary layer as long as possible for the drag or losses reduction, depending on the application. Nevertheless, in some applications, the laminar layer interaction with the shock wave may lead to a strong flow separation. The process of separation usually becomes unsteady and causes buffeting at airfoils and shock oscillations in the internal flows. Shock oscillation causes pulsation of pressure, and consequently a change of the blade load. The main objective of this research is to study the effect of transition on the flow structure of the shock wave boundary layer interaction. This paper focuses on the influence of boundary layer transition on the flow pattern in the blade passage of a compressor cascade. The main question is whether the induced transition upstream of the shock can improve the pressure unsteadiness and the flow downstream of the interaction. The results presented here concern experimental investigations and the used combination of various methods allowed gaining an insightful analysis of the application of transition control devices into a complex flow structure in a compressor cascade passage.

Keywords

Laminar boundary layer Transition Compressor cascade 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant Agreement No. 265455 (TFAST) [12].

References

  1. 1.
    Joslin, R.D.: Aircraft laminar flow control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 1–29 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Messing, R., Kloker, M.J.: Investigation of suction for laminar flow control of free-dimensional boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 117–147 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swoboda, M., Nitsche, W.: Shock boundary-layer interaction on transonic airfoils for laminar and turbulent flow. J. Aircr. 33(1), 100–108 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, B., Reyer, M., Swoboda, M.: Steady and Unsteady Numerical Investigation of Transitional Shock-Boundary-Layer-Interactions on a Fan Blade, German Aerospace Congress (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szwaba, R.: Comparison of the influence of different air-jet vortex generators on the separation region. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 15, 45–52 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szwaba, R.: Influence of air-jet vortex generator diameter on separation region. J. Therm. Sci. 22(4), 294–303 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szwaba, R., Doerffer, P.: Separation control by air-jet vortex generators on turbine blades. In: 9th European Conference on Turbomachinery—Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, vol. II, pp. 1199–1209 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomes, R.A., Niehuis, R.: Aerothermodynamics of a high-pressure turbine blade with very high loading and vortex generators. J. Turbomach. 134(011020), 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szwaba, R., Flaszynski, P., Szumski, J., Doerffer, P.: Influence of air cooling and air-jet vortex generator on flow structure in turbine passage. TASK Q. 19(2), 153–166 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dussauge, J.P., Dupont, P., Debiève, J.F.: Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 85–91 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dussauge, J.P., Piponniau, S., Debiève, J.F., Dupont, P.: A simple model for low frequency unsteadiness in shock induced separation. J. Fluid Mech. 629, 87–108 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryszard Szwaba
    • 1
  • Piotr Doerffer
    • 1
  • Piotr Kaczynski
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental Aerodynamics DepartmentInstitute of Fluid-Flow Machinery (IMP PAN)GdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations