Abstract
Twice-exceptional students are students with both a high potential for mathematical abilities and educational special needs. They are particularly at risk for neither their potential nor their disabilities being recognized. Students who work below their potential are called underachievers. This chapter discusses whether the special learning conditions of twice-exceptional students need a differentiated approach than what is usually applied for underachievement. Furthermore, by means of examples of affected students, the implications for learning processes are illustrated. The focus is put on mathematical giftedness occurring together with learning disabilities (LD), attention deficit disorders (ADD), attention deficit disorders with hyperactivity (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The terms disabilities and disorders are not always used as equivalent; however, in this article, they are. As a more general term to describe different kinds of deficits, the term weakness is used in this article.
- 2.
PriMa is an abbreviation of “Primary grade students on different ways towards mathematics.” It is a cooperation project started in 1999 by the Hamburger Behörde für Schule und Berufsbildung, the William Stern Society (Hamburg) and the University of Hamburg.
- 3.
Since 2010 we have extended the program up to Grade 7.
- 4.
PR is an abbreviation of percentile rank. It indicates the percent of cases that are at or below a score in tests.
- 5.
Assouline et al. (2012) refer to studies, which underline the importance of visual spatial skills for mathematical abilities.
- 6.
The stumbling words test measures understanding while reading. Students must identify words that are useless to various sentences. The test requires automatically reading at a high speed.
- 7.
Leon participated in the project PriMa during Grades 3–6.
- 8.
Timo did not participate in the PriMa project. Here the results of a case study are described (Nolte 2016).
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2016a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM–5). www.dsm5.org/Documents/Austism/SpectrumDisorderFactSheet.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2016.
American Psychiatric Association. (2016b). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM–5). https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder. Accessed September 25, 2016.
American Psychiatric Association. (2016c). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM–5). https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/adhd/what-is-adhd. Accessed September 25, 2016.
Asherson, P. (2013). ADHD in adults: A clinical concern. In C. B. H. Surman (Ed.), ADHD in adults. A practical guide to evaluation and management (pp. 1–17). New York: Humana Press. Springer Science+Business Media.
Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Dockery, L. (2012). Predicting the academic achievement of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1781–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1403-x.
Bachmann, M. (2008). Psychisch auffällige Kinder mit Teilleistungsstörungen. In M. Nolte (Ed.), Integrative Lerntherapie - Grundlagen und Praxis (pp. 19–24). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Barry, T. D., Lyman, R. D., & Klinger, L. G. (2002). Academic underachievement and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: The negative impact of symptom severity on school performance. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 259–283.
Baum, S. (1990). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox (ERIC Digest #E479). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED321484.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2017.
Besnoy, K. D., Swoszowski, N. C., Newman, J. L., Floyd, A., Jones, P., & Byrne, C. (2015). The advocacy experiences of parents of elementary age, twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215569275.
Betz, D., & Breuninger, H. (1982). Teufelskreis Lernstörungen. Analyse und Therapie einer schulischen Störung. München.
Brandl, M., & Nordheimer, S. (2016). Spezifika bei der Identifikation mathematischer Begabung von hörgeschädigten Schülerinnen und Schülern. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 5(4).
Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000304.
Cash, A. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553993.
Chiang, H.-M., & Lin, Y.-H. (2007). Mathematical ability of students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism: A review of literature. Autism, 11(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361307083259.
Diamond, A. (2005). Attention-deficit disorder (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder without hyperactivity): A neurobiologically and behaviorally distinct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (with hyperactivity). Development and Psychopathology, 17(2005), 807–825. https://doi.org/10.10170S0954579405050388.
Diamond, A. (2011). Biological and social influences on cognitive control processes dependent on prefrontal cortex. Progress in Brain Research, 189, 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53884-0.00032-4.
Durstewitz, D., Kelc, M., & Güntürkün, O. (1999). A Neurocomputational theory of the dopaminergic modulation of working memory functions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(7), 2807–2822.
Fielker, D. (1997). Extending mathematical ability through whole class teaching. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Fischer-Ontrup, C., & Fischer, C. (2016). Das Motivations- und Selbststeuerungstraining für begabte Underachiever: Fallbeispiel Aaron. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 5(4), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1024/2235-0977/a000151.
Foley Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575.
Foley Nicpon, M., Assouline, S. G., & Stinson, R. D. (2012). Cognitive and academic profiles of gifted students with autism or Asperger syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211433199.
Fugate, C. M., & Gentry, M. (2015). Understanding adolescent gifted girls with ADHD: Motivated and achieving. High Ability Studies, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1098522.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–148.
Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, and beyond. Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 5–19. http://iratde.org/journal/issues/112-issue-20131. Accessed July 12, 2015.
Gogolin, I. (2012). Sprachliche Bildung im Mathematikunterricht. In W. Blum, R. B., Ferri & K. Maass (Eds.), Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 157–165). Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag | Springer Fachmedien.
Gogolin, I., & Lange, I. (2011). Bildungssprache und Durchgängige Sprachbildung. In S. Fürstenau & M. Gomolla (Eds.), Migration und schulischer Wandel: Mehrsprachigkeit (pp. 107–127). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Springer.
Güntürkün, O., & Westphal, U. (2009). Lernen- Behalten - Anwenden. Vorschläge der Hirnforschung für eine Schule der Zukunft. In C. Fischer, U. Westphal, & C. Fischer-Ontrup (Eds.), Individuelle Förderung: Lernschwierigkeiten als schulische Herausforderung. (pp. 3–22). Berlin: LIT Verlag.
Hanses, P., & Rost, D. H. (1998). Das „Drama“ der hochbegabten Underachiever – „Gewöhnliche“ oder „außergewöhnliche“ Underachiever? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 12, 53–71.
Harder, B. (2009). Twice exceptional – in zweifacher Hinsicht außergewöhnlich: Hochbegabte mit Lern-, Aufmerksamkeits-. Wahrnehmungsstörungen oder Autismus. Heilpädagogik online, 9(2), 64–89.
Hassanein, E. E. A. (2014). Inclusion, disability and culture. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2008). The munich high ability test battery (MHBT): A multidimensional, multimethod approach. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 173–188.
Holling, H., Preckel, F., & Vock, M. (2004). Intelligenzdiagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). An investigation of mathematical abilities in school children. In J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirzup (Eds.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol. II). Chicago: Stanford University, University of Chicago.
Lorenz, J. H. (1998). Analyse und Behebungsmöglichkeiten von Fehlern bei schriftlichen Rechenverfahren und im Sachrechnen in den Klassen 3 und 4. In M. f. K.-J. u. S. Baden-Württemberg (Eds.), Schwierigkeiten im Mathematikunterricht in der Grundschule. Stuttgart.
Lucangeli, D., & Cabrele, S. (2006). Mathematical difficulties and ADHD. Exceptionality, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1401_5.
Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207299473.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205.
Montgomery, D. (2003a). Cildren with Asperger’s syndrome and related disorders. In D. Montgomery (Ed.), Gifted & talented children with special educational needs (pp. 155–167). London: NACE/Fulton Publication.
Montgomery, D. (Ed.). (2003b). Gifted & talented children with special educational needs. London: NACE/Fulton Publication.
Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_4.
Nolte, M. (2000). Rechenschwächen und gestörte Sprachrezeption. Beeinträchtigte Lernprozesse im Mathematikunterricht und in der Einzelbeobachtung. Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhardt.
Nolte, M. (2001). Arithmetic disabilities of children and adults—Neuropsychological approaches to mathematics teaching. Retrieved from http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/e/gdm/2001/Nolte.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2016.
Nolte, M. (2004). Language reception and dyscalculia. In A. Engström (Ed.), Democracy and participation. A challenge for special needs education in mathematics. Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Research Conference on Special Needs Education in Mathematics (Vol. 7, pp. 57–76). Örebro: Örebro University.
Nolte, M. (2012). High IQ and high mathematical talent! Results from nine years talent search in the PriMa-Project Hamburg. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 8 July–15 July, 2012, COEX, Seoul, Korea.
Nolte, M. (2013). Twice exceptional children—Mathematically gifted children in primary schools with special needs. Paper presented at the CERME 8—Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
Nolte, M. (2016). „Twice exceptional“ – Mathematisch besonders begabte Kinder mit besonderem Förderbedarf. In C. Fischer, C. Fischer-Ontrup, F. Käpnick, F. Mönks, N. Neuber, & C. Solzbacher (Eds.), Begabungsförderung: Individuelle Förderung und Inklusive Bildung. Münster: Waxmann-Verlag.
Nolte, M., & Pamperien, K. (2017). Challenging problems in a regular classroom setting and in a special foster programme. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 49(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0825-5.
Pereira, N., Knotts, J. D., & Roberts, J. L. (2015). Current status of twice-exceptional students: A look at legislation and policy in the United States. Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137463.
Preckel, F., & Baudson, T. G. (2013). Hochbegabung - Erkennen, Verstehen, Fördern. München: Verlag C.H.Beck.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302.
Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901.
Scherer, P., Beswick, K., DeBlois, L., Healy, L., & Opitz, E. M. (2016). Assistance of students with mathematical learning difficulties—How can research support practice? ZDM Mathematics Education.
Schulte-Markwort, M. (2004). Zum Stand der Forschung bezüglich ADS/ADHS im Kindes- und Jugendalter. In M. Schulte-Markwort, E. Reich-Schulze, M. Nolte, A. F. Zimpel, H. Goossens-Merkt, H. Schlüter, & K. Wicher (Eds.), Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit, Hyperaktivität, Teilleistungsstörungen (pp. 11–26). Hamburg: Feldhaus Verlag.
Schulte-Markwort, M., Reich-Schulze, E., Nolte, M., Zimpel, A. F., Goossens-Merkt, H., Schlüter, H., & Wicher, K. (2004). Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit, Hyperaktivität, Teilleistungsstörungen. Hamburg: Feldhaus.
Sheffield, L. J. (1999). Serving the needs of the mathematically promising. In L. J. Sheffield (Ed.), Developing mathematically promising students (pp. 43–55). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Silverman, L. K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553228.
Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3&4), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865.
Silverman, L. K. (2006). Twice-exceptional learners: Linda Kreger Silverman looks at the world of the gifted and learning disabled, from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=hamburg&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA368678434&asid=f3763ac5f76eb60cf7105085b113fac9. Accessed October 15, 2016.
Singer, F. M., Sheffield, L. J., Freiman, V., & Brandl, M. (2016). Research on and activities for mathematically gifted students. Berlin: Springer Nature.
Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., & Rost, D. H. (2006). Hochbegabte Underachiever als Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.20.3.213.
Von Aster M. G. (2000). Developmental cognitive neuropsychology of number processing and calculation: Varities of developmental dyscalculia. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, II/41–II/57.
Wieczerkowski, W., & Wagner, H. (1985). Diagnostik von Hochbegabung. In R. S. Jäger, R. Horn & K. Ingenkamp (Eds.), Tests und Trends 4. Jahrbuch der Pädagogischen Diagnostik (pp. 109–134). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
Young, R. L., & Rodi, M. L. (2014). Redefining autism spectrum disorder using DSM-5: The implications of the proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1927-3.
Ziegler, A., Vialle, W., & Wimmer, B. (2013). The actiotope model of giftedness: A short introduction to some central theoretical assumptions. In S. N. Phillipson, H. Stoeger, & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nolte, M. (2018). Twice-Exceptional Students: Students with Special Needs and a High Mathematical Potential. In: Singer, F. (eds) Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73155-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73156-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)