Abstract
The presented paper focuses on encouraging creativity in mathematics lessons in heterogeneous mathematics classrooms. It is an extended version of a paper presented at ICME 2016 in Hamburg. It describes teaching experiments conducted within the frame of the project M3EaL: Multiculturalism, Migration, Mathematics Education and Language (526333-LLP-1-2012-1-IT-COMENIUS-CMP), a multilateral project whose aim was development of teaching units to support immigrant pupils and pupils from different socio-cultural backgrounds (m3eal.dm.unipi.it). The paper shows that if pre-service and in-service teachers face a situation in which they cannot rely on traditional textbooks and ways of doing mathematics—in this case a culturally heterogeneous classroom—they tend to be very creative in planning their lesson and at the same time encourage their pupils’ creativity. Thus cultural heterogeneity may be perceived as advantage as it may result in breaking down stereotypes in mathematics classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arslan, Ç., & Altun, M. (2007). Learning to solve non-routine mathematical problems. Elementary Education Online, 6(1), 50–61.
Barton, B., Barwell, R. & Setati, M. (Eds.) (2007). Multilingualism in mathematics education. Special Issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2).
Barwell, R. (2015). Linguistic stratification in a multilingual mathematics classroom. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1333–1339). Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Education and ERME.
Barwell, R., Barton, B., & Setati, M. (2007). Multilingual Issues in mathematics education: Introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 113–119.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 179–191.
Cantor, G. (1867). Doctoral thesis. Berlin, Germany.
César, M., & Favilli, F. (2005). Diversity seen through teachers’ eyes: Discourses about multicultural classes. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1153–1164). Barcelona: FUNDEMI IQS—Universitat Ramon Llull.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, flow, and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Duval, R. (1993). Registre de représentations sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensé. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 5, 37–65.
Duval, R. (2000). Basic Issues for research in mathematics education. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 55–69). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics: The growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Favilli, F. (Ed.) (2015). Multiculturalism, migration, mathematics education and language: Teachers‘ needs and teaching materials. Pisa, Italy: TEP, http://m3eal.dm.unipi.it. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
Henrard, M. (2006). The irony in the derivatives discounting. Available from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3115/. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). In J. Kilpatrick, & I. Wirszup (Eds.) The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (trans: Teller, J.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kynigos, C., & Theodosopoulou, V. (2001). Synthesizing personal, interactionist and social norms perspectives to analyze student communication in a computer-based mathematical activity in the classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 63–73.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin et al. (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Sense Publishers.
Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: The role of the teacher. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(4), 427–440.
McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & Education quarterly, 26(3), 324–348.
Meany, T., & Lange, T. (2013). Learners in transition between contexts. In M. A. Clements et al. (Eds.), The third international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 27, pp. 169–202). Springer.
MIUR—Ministero dell’Istruzione, Università e Ricerca. (2012). Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo della scuola dell’infanzia e del primo ciclo d’istruzione. Roma: MIUR, http://www.indicazioninazionali.it/documenti_Indicazioni_nazionali/indicazioni_nazionali_infanzia_primo_ciclo.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr. 2017.
Moraová, H., & Novotná, J. (2016). Ornaments and tessellations—Encouraging creativity in mathematics classroom. Presented in TSG 29, ICME 13, Hamburg.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2007). Using two languages while learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Special Issue on Multilingual Mathematics Classrooms, 64(2), 121–144.
Moschkovich, J. (2012). How equity concerns lead to attention to mathematical discourse, equity in discourse for mathematics? Theories, practices and policy, 89–105.
MPI—Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione. (2007). The Italian way to intercultural education and the integration of Foreign pupils. Roma: MPI, http://m3eal.dm.unipi.it/images/doc/03.educational_policy/IT_educational_policy.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr. 2017.
MŠMT Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy. (2013). Framework education programme for primary school education in the Czech Republic. Praha: MŠMT ČR.
NCTM—National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Norén, E. (2008). Bilingual students’ mother tongue: A resource for teaching and learning mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 29–50.
Radford, L., Bardini, C., Sabena, C., Diallo, P., & Simbagoye, A. (2005). On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: A semiotic-cultural perspective on mathematical thinking. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th PME International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 113–120). Melbourne: PME.
Sibanda, L. (2017). Do the annual national assessments in mathematics unfairly assess English Language competence at the expense of mathematical competence? In M. Graven & H. Venkat (Eds.), Improving primary mathematics education, teaching and learning. Research for development in resource-constrained contexts (pp. 147–159). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Singer, F. M., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Teaching and learning cycles in a constructivist approach to instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1613–1634.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.
Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2003). The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107–121.
Tichá, M., & Hošpesová, A. (2010). Tvoření úloh jako cesta k matematické gramotnosti (Problem posing as a way to mathematical literacy, in Czech). In Jak učit matematice žáky ve věku 11 – 15 let; sborník příspěvků celostátní konference (pp. 133–145). Plzeň: Vydavatelský servis.
UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/ceecis/education_18613.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
Winsløw, C. (2003). Semiotic and discursive variables in CAS-based didactical engineering. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 271–288.
Wittmann, E. Ch. (1995). Mathematics education as a ‘Design Science’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 355–374.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the following teachers and educators who piloted the teaching units in their schools in Austria, Italy and the Czech Republic: Andreas Ulovec and Therese Tomiska (Austria), Antonella Castellini and Lucia Alfia Fazzino (Italy), Hana Moraová (Czech Republic).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moraová, H., Novotná, J., Favilli, F. (2018). Ornaments and Tessellations: Encouraging Creativity in the Mathematics Classroom. In: Singer, F. (eds) Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73155-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73156-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)