Skip to main content

Host Defences Against Brood Parasite Nestlings: Theoretical Expectations and Empirical Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Avian Brood Parasitism

Part of the book series: Fascinating Life Sciences ((FLS))

Abstract

In the past, chick discrimination was assumed to be non-existent without virtually any research invested to check the reality. Models of brood parasitism considered the benefits of chick rejection small and costs too high; consequently, the nestling stage was long ignored in studies of host–parasite coevolution. Remarkably, the majority of recent studies that addressed parasite chick biology did find evidence for host behaviours that alleviate the costs of parasitism during nestling stage. Most of the hosts that (apparently) discriminate against parasite chicks are acceptors of natural parasite eggs; this pattern is in line with the rarer enemy model. The main impetus for future work is therefore not naively assuming but empirically checking the (non)-existence of chick discrimination to show how common is chick discrimination in reality. This will allow to elucidate mechanisms of chick discrimination, both those that specifically evolved as a response to past parasitism pressure and those stemming from non-specific general host life history traits, and factors that facilitate or constrain their evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson MG, Hauber ME (2007) A recognition-free mechanism for reliable rejection of brood parasites. Trends Ecol Evol 22:283–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Moskát C, Bán M, Grim T, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009) Egg eviction imposes a recoverable cost of virulence in chicks of a brood parasite. PLoS One 4:e7725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Ranke PS, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2010) Absence of egg discrimination in a suitable cuckoo Cuculus canorus host breeding away from trees. J Avian Biol 41:501–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bán M, Moskát C, Barta Z, Hauber ME (2013) Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol 24:1014–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV (2003) Frequency of egg rejection by potential hosts of the New Zealand cuckoos. Condor 105:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton NF, Planqué R, Franks NR (2007) Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter–victim systems. Bull Math Biol 69:957–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1989) The comparative breeding behaviour of two sympatric cuckoos, Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chrysococcyx basalis and the shining bronze-cuckoo C. lucidus, in Western Australia: a new model for the evolution of egg morphology and host specificity in avian brood parasites. Ibis 131:528–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Kilner RM, Fuisz T, Davies NB (2003) Differences in the nestling begging calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Anim Behav 65:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli-Négrel D, Hauber ME, Robertson J, Sulloway FJ, Hoi H, Griggio M, Kleindorfer S (2012) Embryonic learning of vocal passwords in superb fairywrens reveals intruder cuckoo nestlings. Curr Biol 22:2155–2160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli-Négrel D, Hauber ME, Kleindorfer S (2014) Prenatal learning in an Australian songbird: habituation and individual discrimination in superb fairy-wren embryos. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20141154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli-Négrel D, Webster MS, Dowling JL, Hauber ME, Kleindorfer S (2016) Vocal imitation of mother’s calls by begging red-backed fairywren nestlings increases parental provisioning. Auk 133:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats, 1st edn. T. & A. D. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke ML (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262:131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:489–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Mársico MC, Gantchoff MG, Reboreda JC (2012) Host–parasite coevolution beyond the nestling stage? Mimicry of host fledglings by the specialist screaming cowbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3401–3408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey K, Carrizo M, Verniere L, Mahler B, Peters A (2011) Rejection of brood-parasitic shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis nestlings by the firewood-gatherer Anumbius annumbi? J Avian Biol 42:463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar D (1907) An inquiry into the parasitic habits of the Indian koel. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 17:765–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraga RM (1998) Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius). In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston AJ (1976) Brood parasitism by the pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. J Anim Ecol 45:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill BJ (1998) Behavior end ecology of the shining cuckoo, Chrysococcyx lucidus. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2002) Why is mimicry in cuckoo eggs sometimes so poor? J Avian Biol 33:302–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2005) Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc 84:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2007a) Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann Zool Fenn 44:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2007b) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2008) Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol 26:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2011) Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm? Front Zool 8:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2013) Mimicry, signalling, and co-evolution. Ethology 119:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2017) Chick discrimination versus adaptive parasitic egg acceptance: the egg dilution effect hypothesis revisited. Ornithol Sci 16:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Samaš P (2016) Growth performance of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus in cavity nesting hosts. Acta Ornithol 51:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Stokke BG (2016) In the light of introduction: importance of introduced populations for the study of brood parasite-host coevolution. In: Weis JS, Sol D (eds) Biological invasions and animal behaviour, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S73–S75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009a) Experimentally constrained virulence is costly for common cuckoo chicks. Ethology 115:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009b) The cost of virulence: an experimental study of egg eviction by brood parasitic chicks. Behav Ecol 20:1138–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Tyller Z, Samaš P (2017) Unusual diet of brood parasite nestlings and its fitness consequences. Auk 134:732–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley D, Šulc M, Brennan PLR, Hauber ME, Grim T, Honza M (2016) Dynamic egg color mimicry. Ecol Evol 6:4192–4202

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley D, Grim T, Igic B, Samaš P, López AV, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2017) Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20162592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison C (2002) Bird nests, eggs and nestlings of Britain and Europe, 1st edn. Harper, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegemann A, Voesten R (2011) Can skylarks Alauda arvensis discriminate a parasite nestling? Possible case of nestling cuckoo Cuculus canorus ejection by its host parents. Ardea 99:117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson KA, Sealy SG (1989) Responses of yellow warblers to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Anim Behav 38:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Vošlajerová K, Moskát C (2007) Eviction behaviour of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus chicks. J Avian Biol 38:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Procházka P, Šicha V, Požgayová M (2010) Nest defence in a cuckoo host: great reed warblers risk themselves equally for their own and parasitic chicks. Behaviour 147:741–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo J, Yang C, Su T, Liang W, Møller AP (2018) Russet sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Res 9:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood DR, Moskát C, Rutila J, Hauber ME (2012) A shared chemical basis of avian host–parasite egg colour mimicry. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1068–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdain FCR (1925) A study of parasitism in the cuckoos. Proc Zool Soc Lond 44:639–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2006) Function and evolution of color in young birds. In: Hill G, McGraw K (eds) Bird coloration, 1st edn. Harvard University Press, London, pp 201–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Maurer G, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM (2008) Socially acquired host-specific mimicry and the evolution of host races in Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis. Evolution 62:1689–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM (2009) Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol 20:978–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Heinsohn R, Hall ML, Peters A, Kilner RM (2011) Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2455–2463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawes MJ, Marthews TR (2003) When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model. Behav Ecol 14:757–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levréro F, Durand L, Vignal C, Blanc A, Mathevon N (2009) Begging calls support offspring individual identity and recognition by zebra finch parents. C R Biol 332:579–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG (2016) Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol 30:905–923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein G (2001) Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick–chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim Behav 61:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A (1993) Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature 362:743–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean IG, Maloney RF (1998) Brood parasitism, recognition and response: the options. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–272

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean IG, Rhodes G (1991) Enemy recognition and response in birds. Curr Ornithol 6:173–211

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean IG, Waas JR (1987) Do cuckoo chicks mimic the begging calls of their hosts? Anim Behav 35:1896–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH (2000) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy PJ (1973) Vocal mimicry of their hosts by nestlings of the great spotted cuckoo and striped crested cuckoo. Ibis 115:602–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolai J (1964) Der Brutparasitismus der Viduinae als ethologisches Problem. Z Tierpsychol 21:129–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolai J (1974) Mimicry in parasitic birds. Sci Am 231:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble DG, Davies NB, Hartley IR, McRae SB (1999) The red gape of the nestling cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is not a supernormal stimulus for three common hosts. Behaviour 136:759–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyári ÁS, Joseph L (2012) Evolution in Australasian mangrove forests: multilocus phylogenetic analysis of the gerygone warblers (Aves: Acanthizidae). PLoS One 7:e31840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (2005) The cuckoos, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB, Woods JL, Payne LL (2001) Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Anim Behav 62:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planqué R, Britton NF, Franks NR, Peletier MA (2002) The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull Math Biol 64:1045–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T (1993) Exploitation of host mechanisms for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etología 3:235–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed RA (1968) Studies of the diederik cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius in the Transvaal. Ibis 110:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldán M, Soler M, Márquez R, Soler JJ (2013) The vocal begging display of great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius nestlings in nests of its two main host species: genetic differences or developmental plasticity? Ibis 155:867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samas P, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Grim T (2014) Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism? Front Zool 11:34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Martínez MA, David S, Londoño GA, Robinson SK (2017) Brood parasitism by the enigmatic and rare pavonine cuckoo in Amazonian Peru. Auk 134:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato NJ, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010a) Egg dilution effect hypothesis: a condition under which parasitic nestling ejection behaviour will evolve. Ornithol Sci 9:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010b) Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett 6:67–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato NJ, Tanaka KD, Okahisa Y, Yamamichi M, Kuehn R, Gula R, Ueda K, Theuerkauf J (2015) Nestling polymorphism in a cuckoo-host system. Curr Biol 25:R1151–R1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz JG (2005a) Low survival of parasite chicks may result from their imperfect adaptation to hosts rather than expression of defenses against parasitism. Evolution 59:2017–2024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz JG (2005b) Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim Behav 70:839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shizuka D, Lyon BE (2010) Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks. Nature 463:223–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shizuka D, Lyon BE (2011) Hosts improve the reliability of chick recognition by delaying the hatching of brood parasitic eggs. Curr Biol 21:515–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Šicha V, Procházka P, Honza M (2007) Hopeless solicitation? Host-absent vocalization in the common cuckoo has no effect on feeding rate of reed warblers. J Ethol 25:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2002) Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging, 1st edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2008) Do hosts of interspecific brood parasites feed parasitic chicks with lower-quality prey? Anim Behav 76:1761–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2009) Co-evolutionary arms race between brood parasites and their hosts at the nestling stage. J Avian Biol 40:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, De Neve L (2012) Great spotted cuckoo nestlings but not magpie nestlings starve in experimental age-matched broods. Ethology 118:1036–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG, Møller AP (1995) Chick recognition and acceptance – a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T, De Neve L (2013a) Magpies do not desert after prolonging the parental care period: an experimental study. Behav Ecol 24:1292–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Ruiz-Castellano C, Carra LG, Ontanilla J, Martín-Galvez D (2013b) Do first-time breeding females imprint on their own eggs? Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20122518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, De Neve L, Roncalli G, Marcías-Sánchez E, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Pérez-Contreras T (2014) Great spotted cuckoo fledglings are disadvantaged by magpie host parents when reared together with magpie nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Macías-Sánchez E, Martín-Gálvez D, De Neve L (2017) Complex feeding behaviour by magpies in nests with great spotted cuckoo nestlings. J Avian Biol 48:1406–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyn P (1973) Some notes on the breeding biology of the striped cuckoo. Ostrich 44:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka KD, Ueda K (2005) Signal exploitation by parasitic young in birds: a new categorization of manipulative signals. Ornithol Sci 4:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner M, Richner H (2008) Ultraviolet reflectance of plumage for parent–offspring communication in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 19:369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorogood R, Kilner RM, Rasmussen JL (2017) Grey gerygone hosts are not egg rejecters, but shining bronze-cuckoos lay cryptic eggs. Auk 134:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokue K, Ueda K (2010) Mangrove gerygones Gerygone laevigaster eject little bronze-cuckoo Chalcites minutillus hatchlings from parasitized nests. Ibis 152:835–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Grim T (2014) Testing for correlations between behaviours in a cuckoo host: why do host defences not covary? Anim Behav 92:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Prokop P, Honza M (2012) Breeding success of a brood parasite is associated with social mating status of its host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1187–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Trnka M, Grim T (2015) Do rufous common cuckoo females indeed mimic a predator? An experimental test. Biol J Linn Soc 116:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Capek M, Honza M (2016) Chemical defence in avian brood parasites: production and function of repulsive secretions in common cuckoo chicks. J Avian Biol 47:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyller Z, Kysučan M, Grim T (2018) Post-fledging behavior of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) attended by the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs): a comprehensive approach to study the least known stage of brood parasite-host coevolution. Wilson J Ornithol 130

    Google Scholar 

  • Voipio P (1953) The hepaticus variety and the juvenile types of the cuckoo. Ornis Fenn 30:97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Kimball R (2012) Nestmate killing by obligate brood parasitic chicks: is this linked to obligate siblicidal behavior? J Ornithol 153:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo, 1st edn. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T (2013) Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol 44:216–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP (2015) Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1821–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to E. Røskaft, A. Moksnes and B. G. Stokke for their hospitality during my stay at NTNU in Trondheim in 2002 during which I conceived the rarer enemy model and to Ø. Holen for inviting me to give a seminar at the University of Oslo in October 2002 where I first presented the concept (thus, the model was developed independently from conclusions of Langmore et al. 2003). I am indebted to R. Planqué, N. F. Britton and N. R. Franks for their work on our joint manuscript (during 2003–2005) which integrated their idea of defence portfolios with my concept of rarer enemy; after being rejected six times, we decided to publish two separate papers (Grim 2006; Britton et al. 2007). For the comments on the draft, I am grateful to M. C. De Mársico and R. Planqué. The manuscript benefited from comments by D. Martín-Gálvez, R. Kilner and M. Soler. The Human Frontier Science Program (RGY69/2007 and RGY83/2012) and the Czech Science Foundation (P506/12/2404) supported my research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Grim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grim, T. (2017). Host Defences Against Brood Parasite Nestlings: Theoretical Expectations and Empirical Evidence. In: Soler, M. (eds) Avian Brood Parasitism. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73138-4_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics