Skip to main content

Final Comments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 275 Accesses

Part of the book series: Computational Approaches to Cognition and Perception ((CACP))

Abstract

We discuss three broader implications of state-trace analysis. First, we briefly outline signed difference analysis—the generalization of STA to more than one latent variable. State-trace analysis asks if the effects of one or more independent variables on two or more dependent variables are mediated by one or more than one latent variables. SDA asks if the effects are mediated by a model consisting of two, three, or potentially any number of latent variables. Second, we discuss the question of characterizing the latent variables revealed by STA or SDA. Third, we discuss the question of model complexity—where low-dimensional models are necessarily nested in higher-dimensional models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although in SDA, a two-dimensional model may be rejected in favor of a three-dimensional model and so on.

References

  • Dunn, J. C., & Anderson, L. (submitted). Signed difference analysis: Testing for structure under monotonicity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. C., & James, R. N. (2003). Signed difference analysis: Theory and application. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(4), 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1952). Is there a God? In R. G. Slater (Ed.), The collected papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11: Last philosophical testament, 1943–68 (pp. 547–548). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, R. G., Dunn, J. C., & Hayes, B. K. (2017). Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000088

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(6), 1341–1354.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dunn, J.C., Kalish, M.L. (2018). Final Comments. In: State-Trace Analysis. Computational Approaches to Cognition and Perception. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73129-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics