Skip to main content

Global vs. Local Semantics of BPMN 2.0 OR-Join

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10706))

Abstract

Nowadays, BPMN 2.0 has acquired a clear predominance for modelling business processes. However, one of its drawback is the lack of a formal semantics, that leads to different interpretations, and hence implementations, of some of its features. This, as a matter of fact, results on process implementations using such features that do not fit with designers expectations, and that are not portable from one BPMN enactment tools to another. Among the BPMN elements particular ambiguous is the semantics of the OR-Join. Several formalisations of this element have been proposed in the literature, but none of them is derived from a direct and faithful translation of the current version of BPMN standard. In this work we instead provide direct, global and local, formalisations compliant with the OR-Join semantics reported in the BPMN 2.0 standard. In particular, the local semantics is devised to more efficiently determine the OR-Join enablement. The soundness of the approach is given by demonstrating the correspondence of the local semantics with respect to the global one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pastor, O.: Model-driven development in practice: from requirements to code. In: Steffen, B., Baier, C., van den Brand, M., Eder, J., Hinchey, M., Margaria, T. (eds.) SOFSEM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10139, pp. 405–410. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51963-0_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN V 2.0) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suchenia, A., Potempa, T., Ligęza, A., Jobczyk, K., Kluza, K.: Selected approaches towards taxonomy of business process anomalies. In: Pełech-Pilichowski, T., Mach-Król, M., Olszak, C.M. (eds.) Advances in Business ICT: New Ideas from Ongoing Research. SCI, vol. 658, pp. 65–85. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47208-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M., Desel, J., Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: a vicious circle. In: EPK, pp. 71–79 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunze, M., Berger, P., Weske, M.: BPM academic initiative - fostering empirical research. In: BPM Demonstration Track, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 940, pp. 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Völzer, H.: A new semantics for the inclusive converging gateway in safe processes. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 294–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dumas, M., Grosskopf, A., Hettel, T., Wynn, M.: Semantics of standard process models with OR-Joins. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 41–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Thalheim, B., Sorensen, O., Borger, E.: On defining the behavior of OR-Joins in business process models. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 15(1), 3–32 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christiansen, D.R., Carbone, M., Hildebrandt, T.: Formal semantics and implementation of BPMN 2.0 inclusive gateways. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 146–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19589-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Prinz, T.M., Amme, W.: A complete and the most liberal semantics for converging OR gateways in sound processes. Complex Syst. Inf. Model. Q. 4, 32–49 (2015). http://dblp.org/db/journals/csimq/csimq4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gfeller, B., Völzer, H., Wilmsmann, G.: Faster Or-Join enactment for BPMN 2.0. In: Dijkman, R., Hofstetter, J., Koehler, J. (eds.) BPMN 2011. LNBIP, vol. 95, pp. 31–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wynn, M.T., et al.: Business process verification-finally a reality!. Bus. Process Manag. J. 15(1), 74–92 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alfresco Software Inc: Activiti v. 6.0. www.activiti.org (2017)

  15. Camunda services GmbH: Camunda v. 7.7.0. www.camunda.com (2017)

  16. Flowable: Flowable v. 6.1.0. www.flowable.org (2017)

  17. Red Hat: jBPM v. 7.0.0. www.jBPM.org (2017)

  18. ProcessMaker Inc.: Process maker v. 3.2. www.processmaker.com (2017)

  19. Signavio Inc: Signavio v. 11.2.0. www.signavio.com (2017)

  20. Stadust: Stadust v. 4.1.0. www.eclipse.org/stardust (2017)

  21. Sydle: Sydle. www.sydle.com (2017)

  22. Szwarcfiter, J.L., Lauer, P.E.: A search strategy for the elementary cycles of a directed graph. BIT Numer. Math. 16(2), 192–204 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1(1), 269–271 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow verification: finding control-flow errors using petri-net-based techniques. In: van der Aalst, W., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 161–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45594-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Corradini, F., Fornari, F., Muzi, C., Polini, A., Re, B., Tiezzi, F.: On avoiding erroneous synchronization in BPMN processes. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 288, pp. 106–119. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Corradini, F., Muzi, C., Re, B., Rossi, L., Tiezzi, F.: Global vs. Local Semantics of BPMN 2.0 OR-Join. Technical report, Univ. Camerino (2017). http://pros.unicam.it/documents.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Muzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Corradini, F., Muzi, C., Re, B., Rossi, L., Tiezzi, F. (2018). Global vs. Local Semantics of BPMN 2.0 OR-Join. In: Tjoa, A., Bellatreche, L., Biffl, S., van Leeuwen, J., Wiedermann, J. (eds) SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10706. Edizioni della Normale, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Edizioni della Normale, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73116-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73117-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics